Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on globa

[Likkmee]

This message brought to you by British Petroleum. Thanks for listening.

 

[Old Rocks]

UAH Global Temperature Update for January 2020: +0.56 deg. C « Roy Spencer, PhD

 

[Likkmee]

OMG ! Its .5726489 C hotter at my house than it was last wednesday ! The coffee is burning up !

 

[ReinyDays]

OMG ! Its .5726489 C hotter at my house than it was last wednesday ! The coffee is burning up !

Horsefeathers ... that's only 0.5726487 ºC hotter ... if hyperbole is all you have, then you ain't got nothin' ...

 

[Likkmee]

Hey. It matches the chart so it's all I got. If it warms up a little more my avocados will ripen a bit quicker

 

[justoffal]

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.

Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.

As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:

Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures
This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters global temperatures.

That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.” It states:

Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray (GCR)-induced cloud formation…

In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.​

So it looks like the Climate Change Cult doesn't know about clouds. Can't wait to hear how this attack on dogma is wrong simply because it's an attack on dogma.

The hell you say?


More white clouds, reflecting light and radiation back into space?!?....Who could have seen that coming?

Clearly since they are white clouds and not black clouds the whole thing must be racist.

Jo

 

[justoffal]

I've noticed in the summertime...

... it's cooler when it's cloudy.

RACIST!

JO

 

[flacaltenn]

Same shit we saw from Lindzen, and consequently falsified.

It's not shit.. But that one paper cited is also "not climate". That graph is a 20 year period.. Which makes it "weather"... Because the GW signature in a 20 year period is only about 0.26DegC and that would be hard to find.. Even El ninos have a 3 year overwhelming effect over the GW "signal" we are looking for.. Unless of course, you use the NOAA based temperature chart for the public where the El Ninos just mysteriously DISAPPEAR !!!!!

SO -- I'd be CURIOUS if anyone could extend that analysis to a 60 or 100 year period.. But I DOUBT IT.. Because outside of the satellite era, there's not enough "cloud thickness" or temporal data to do it right.

Wonder why the study ends in 2009 or so?? There's a LOT of questions. And the paper is premature..

THE OTHER paper quoted is ALSO weather -- IS published in Nature and reviewed, and LEAPS to a freaking similar conclusion.. I'd need to read it whole to find out what induced them to state that clouds DOMINATE climate. Also a bunch of monsoon data there that just doesn't really interest me...

 

[sealybobo]

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.

Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.

As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:

Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures
This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters global temperatures.

That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.” It states:

Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray (GCR)-induced cloud formation…

In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.​

So it looks like the Climate Change Cult doesn't know about clouds. Can't wait to hear how this attack on dogma is wrong simply because it's an attack on dogma.

Insane. We are destroying this planet. For thousands of other species who are endangered. This is happening in South America, the rain forests.

we are the idiots on krypton.

Natural News - Media Bias/Fact Check

A factual search reveals that Natural News has failed too many fact checks to list here. Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.​

Save your breath horsefeathers. The OP INCLUDED the links to the research.. The monsoon study linked in the OP is a valid study.. This paper with the chart has not been confirmed or picked up by others yet -- but it probably will be... It's the bias and control of publishing any science CONTRARY to the "popular wisdom" is getting in the way..

Rather than researching the source, have you ever considered taking a crack at reading the studies???

same question for you @evenflow

I bet the scientific community and the scientific consensus disagrees with you.

 

[flacaltenn]

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.

Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.

As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:

Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures
This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters global temperatures.

That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.” It states:

Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray (GCR)-induced cloud formation…

In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun, allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.​

So it looks like the Climate Change Cult doesn't know about clouds. Can't wait to hear how this attack on dogma is wrong simply because it's an attack on dogma.

Insane. We are destroying this planet. For thousands of other species who are endangered. This is happening in South America, the rain forests.

we are the idiots on krypton.

Natural News - Media Bias/Fact Check

A factual search reveals that Natural News has failed too many fact checks to list here. Overall, we rate Natural News a Questionable source based on promotion of quackery level pseudoscience and conspiracy theories, as well as extreme right wing bias. This is one of the most discredited sources on the internet.​

Save your breath horsefeathers. The OP INCLUDED the links to the research.. The monsoon study linked in the OP is a valid study.. This paper with the chart has not been confirmed or picked up by others yet -- but it probably will be... It's the bias and control of publishing any science CONTRARY to the "popular wisdom" is getting in the way..

Rather than researching the source, have you ever considered taking a crack at reading the studies???

same question for you @evenflow

I bet the scientific community and the scientific consensus disagrees with you.

What exactly was in that post that "the scientific community disagrees with me"???

We can fix most of your "important" misconceptions, but more importantly, why is this personal? Can you not discuss the issue??

 

[bluzman61]

Hey. It matches the chart so it's all I got. If it warms up a little more my avocados will ripen a bit quicker

MY avocados have been ripe for many, many years. And they get REALLY ripe if I don't wash them for a couple days!

 

[mamooth]

There's another detailed debunking here:

Non-peer-reviewed manuscript falsely claims natural cloud changes can explain global warming

Needless to say, no denier will read it. And can you blame them? They want to avoid pain, and looking at sources that disagree with their religion causes them physical pain due to the cognitive dissonance.

 

[mamooth]

Meanwhile newspapers in The UK (except in Communist Wales) are warning about the impending mini ice age:

Weather warning: Earth could be hit by MINI ICE-AGE as Sun ‘hibernates’

Cyclical.

Look it up, liberals.

Your religion has been predicting that new ice age non-stop for over 40 years now.

Yet that ice age never arrives, and it never will arrive.

Your religion gets every prediction wrong, every time, yet you still stay devoted. I suppose if you look at it one way, the purity of your religious faith is kind of touching.

 

[mamooth]

Computer models lacking repeatable, empirical verification are not evidence..

And yet all of the deniers here are so very excited about the awesome new model presented in that "paper". Can you explain the inconsistency?

Oh, I see. Models are good if they agree with your beliefs, and models are bad if they disagree. I'm glad we cleared that up.

We know how this ends, in the same way every other denier "paper" kerfluffle has ended. The world keeps on warming strongly, despite the denier protestations that it can't be possible.

 

[mamooth]

There are far more variables to climate than just how much American coal and SUV CO2 is in the atmosphere.

And you new "study" examines _one_ of them, and completely ignores every other factor.

So, by your own standard, your new study is garbage. I'm glad we settled that.

 

[flacaltenn]

There's another detailed debunking here:

Non-peer-reviewed manuscript falsely claims natural cloud changes can explain global warming

Needless to say, no denier will read it. And can you blame them? They want to avoid pain, and looking at sources that disagree with their religion causes them physical pain due to the cognitive dissonance.

I must not be a denier then, because I reached similar but less rabid and exaggerated conclusions about the unpublished paper just a few posts ago.. Just sayin'....

Maybe my "debunking" was even more fundamental and useful...

 

[flacaltenn]

And yet all of the deniers here are so very excited about the awesome new model presented in that "paper". Can you explain the inconsistency?

Probably not.. But apparently YOU cant detect the difference between modeling and just massaging empirical data...

 

[ReinyDays]

Relative humidity isn't changing ... the air just above the oceans is at 100% or quickly gaining water vapor to be 100% ... temperature has no effect on this ... simple physics ... so that's one important climate parameter that's not changing with global warming ...

What does change is absolute humidity ... the mass of water vapor in at 100% RH increases with increasing temperatures ... and as they say, what goes up must come down, thus we'll have a warmer and wetter future and rainfall rates will be increasing ...

The bad news is with such a trivial increase in temperature (2ºC over 100 years), we'll only see a trivial increase in fresh water supplies ... no where even close to the fresh water we'll need then, but it will be some extra water ... that's a benefit of global warming ... more rain ...

 

[daveman]

There are far more variables to climate than just how much American coal and SUV CO2 is in the atmosphere.

And you new "study" examines _one_ of them, and completely ignores every other factor.

So, by your own standard, your new study is garbage. I'm glad we settled that.

That's nice. Go play.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"I've looked at clouds from both sides now..."

Mods, please move to conspiracy theory section or the rubber room.