Oh my, what a bunch of ignorant ***** we have here. When they cannot debate the science, they immediatly start yelling 'socialism'. Then continue on to abortion. Which of course has zero to do with a changing climate created by the GHGs that we have put into the atmosphere.
These retards think that the environmental destruction created by mountaintop removal mining is an improvement on nature. And tobacco is good for you. That lead, mercury, and uranium are good things to put into the atmosphere.
But, they have already lost. Wind is now far cheaper as generation that even dirty coal. Solar will be, perhaps before this year is out. And as the batteries become less expensive and the energy density increases, the EV will replace the ICE auto, and then the same for trucks.
Let's take the opportunity to have an honest heart to heart here O-Rocks.
You've got about 30,000 posts on this topic and BullWinkle As both Crick and Abraham has about 12,000 almost exclusively on Global Warming.
CrickHam can't absorb any information on this topic that doesn't fit his template. PURPOSELY can't remember shit that happened on this board last week. And NOW claims he's unaware of any efforts to scare people into compliance on the AGW issue --- EVEN THO -- the Dictator in Chief of the USA is a PRIME LEADER of the AGW fear campaign.. Having to ask those type of questions is a very trollish behaviour.
So --- the way it's been going on this forum for years is
1) You guys toss up ancient or recent studies that are paid for TARGETED AGW funding and make scary innuendoes about what MIGHT HAPPEN.
2) We tell you the weaknesses in those studies and why these are not settled science or proof of anything. And we wait WILLINGLY to discuss the specifics of each and every study or piece of evidence that you present.
3) You then change the subject, dodge the use of any personal thought or intuition -- call us deniers -- and appeal to authority..
4) 6 months or a year later -- some climate scientist will recant or revise their wildly hysterical prognostications and we will post it. You (you know who you are) will forget EVERYTHING ABOUT THIS discussion and continue to the use the damaged studies as your evidence.
As an example of this -- you continue to post (about 40 times now) a historical version of the role of CO2 in atmospheric warming. I have repeatedly stated that I don't deny that CO2 is a greenhouse gas and has a limited ability to warm the planet. And I continue by telling you that YOUR THEORY --- that you are wasting 30,000 posts attempting to defend --- ADMITS that CO2 is only the trigger event for the projected effects of AGW. The scenario where the Earth commits suicide because of 2deg trigger. All because of ill-concieved GLOBAL magic multipliers that bestow SuperPowers upon CO2 as the climate control knob.
YET ---- AGAIN --- you and other warmers run directly away from those observations and continue to troll with no accumulated memory of any of the debate.
One has to reach the conclusion that the maniac strident Climate warriors that waste their time here either cannot FOLLOW the discussion, or are so enamored of the powerful personalities leading this lemming march that you don't care to actually discuss or remember any details...
It's getting real old.. And we need some new Warmer Warriors to get out of this GroundHog Day hell....