CurveLight
Rookie
- Oct 16, 2009
- 9,768
- 317
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
Oh goodness you are fucking pathetic. Do you have any fucking idea what "positive identification" means? You still have not shown that.
The reason I'm pointing to the ENTIRE sentence is because I am honest. Liars like you want to...no....HAVE TO....ignore anything that doesn't suit your agenda. It was a RECONSTRUCTION because they don't literally have the real time ID data. Also notice you just provided contradictory evidence. Naw, you're a fucking liar...you won't admit it.
Your bullshit olson thread also shows you don't give a fuck about honesty nor evidence. You ignore FBI evidence in favor of shit off an OCTA site. Grow up.
dude, this is what you said that started this entire discussion.
""Not a fact flight 77 was on radar after it dropped from radar at about 8:55 am. It is strictly assumed flight 77 is the aircraft that reappeared on radar. Even when they assumed it was 77, it was still about a 35 minute window of being missing. The problem there is turning the xponder off doesn't make a commercial jet a stealth aircraft.""
it is not strictly assumed. it was tracked the entire time. it was tracked while the transponder was on and while it was off with no break in between. that is positive identification.
you are a liar.
It was not continuously tracked with positive I'd but no matter how many times you are shown why you will ignore it cause you're pathetic. Not only did you totally fail to support your claim but you have been shown even the fucking CR admits it flew UNDETECTED for 36 minutes. First you claim FAA equipment tracked it (you have never said WHAT equipment or WHERE) then you claim it was the RADES. Can you pick a false claim and stick to it?
The problem is, like most OCTAs
, you are woefully ignorant so you google around and the first time you see a government link you think will support your bullshit you paste it and scream "Ha! Gotcha!" But as been shown, you're fucking clueless and that is why you have to keep changing what you say.