There is a mountain more evidence here than the Democrats in the House used to impeach a sitting President.
Evidence of what exactly?
Something I just realized. This email about China and "the big guy" was in May 2017, which is after Joe Biden left office.
When he was bragging about shaking down Ukraine, he was vice president.
You mean when he was achieving President Obama foreign policy objective in the Ukraine of getting rid of corrupt Russian align prosecutors? You would rather we just give them foreign aid money and not achieve our objective?
A prosecutor that was investigating the company Hunter was on the board with. Don't let the facts get in your way.
Except he wasn't. He was suppose to be investing the former Russian backed owner for crimes committed before Hunter was hired. His lack of investigating was the reason everyone in the EU, the IMF and the USA wanted him gone.
Good story, but the reason Biden wanted him gone is because he didn't want to get busted. Just think, none of this would be happening if Biden didn't brag about it.
Who turned you in to a liar? Trump??
No lie in that statement. You didn't see the video?
Yes, of course I've seen the video..... and Biden was bragging about what he was able to accomplish as VP with the Ukraine, and getting rid of their internal, corruption.... for the USA and allies best interest.
We and allies, were funding the Ukraine to get on their feet....and were tired of sending the Ukraine money, that only ended up in the hands of corrupt politicians and crooked businesses.....
Shokin, the man Joe helped get rid of, was corrupt, and not prosecuting these corrupt businesses, such as Burisma.... Shokin and two of his prosecutors, were being paid, under the table, in Diamonds, by these corrupt businesses, to keep these prosecutors from investigating and charging them, with the crimes these businesses were committing.
Viktor Shokin, their General Prosecutor was finally removed from office 4 months after Joe threatened the Ukraine President, because the Ukrainian People, had enough of Shokin's corruption.... with letting his Diamond Prosecutors who were caught red handed with their diamond payoff, go...without prosecution....
Only in Trump’s world could what Joe Biden did in Ukraine be considered corrupt
Oct. 7, 2019 at 10:15 a.m. EDT
President Trump’s smear campaign against former vice president Joe Biden — a campaign that sought to enlist Ukrainian officials by threatening to withhold security assistance vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression — is based on an Orwellian inversion of reality.
The smear perpetuates the widely refuted claim that Biden did something wrong during the Obama administration by pressing Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was regarded on both sides of the Atlantic as blatantly corrupt. The United States’ European allies and the Ukrainian anti-corruption community were already working to remove the prosecutor from office.
What’s striking about Trump and his personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, is that they seem to be arguing that a figure at the epicenter of some of Ukraine’s most notorious corruption scandals should have remained in place.
One episode in particular illustrates why so many were eager to get rid of Viktor Shokin. Midway through his tenure as prosecutor general (February 2015 to March 2016), the Ukrainian Security Service raided the homes of two of Shokin’s subordinates and found a substantial stash of diamonds, cash and other valuables, leading the Ukrainian media to dub the two men the "diamond prosecutors.”
David Sakvarelidze, the deputy prosecutor general, who looked into the case, found that “wherever it’s possible to physically pressure or scare someone or use administrative resources, they’re launching a full-frontal attack.”
The characterization angered Shokin, who promptly sacked Sakvarelidze. However, Sakvarelidze wouldn’t be silenced and went public by accusing the “diamond prosecutors” of being Shokin’s business partners....
READ THESE LINKS AS WELL, or stay ignorant...if you wish....
Mr. Shokin had been criticized for turning a blind eye to corruption, but political observers said he played an important role in balancing competing interests.
www.nytimes.com
Trump has claimed Biden forced out Ukraine's top prosecutor in order to benefit his son. Former diplomats say the prosecutor wasn't doing his job.
www.usatoday.com
