Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), was a
landmark decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States decided in 2010.
Senator
Mitch McConnell commended the decision, arguing that it represented "an important step in the direction of restoring the First Amendment rights".
[3] By contrast, former President
Barack Obama stated that the decision "gives the special interests and their lobbyists even more power in Washington".
The ruling represented a turning point on campaign finance, allowing unlimited election spending by corporations and labor unions, and setting the stage for
Speechnow.org v. FEC, which authorized the creation of "Independent Expenditure Committees", more commonly known as
Super PACs
studies by political scientists have concluded that
Citizens United worked in favor of the electoral success of
Republican candidates.
Anyone want to guess how Clarence voted?
And I'm sure his billionaire Crow wanted him to vote that way.
"The real problem with Citizens United: Campaign finance, dark money, and shadow parties"
In fact, show me one time EVER that Clarence didn't side with billionaires. He did 100% of the time. Because he's bought and paid for.