Clarence And Virginia Thomas Have An Impressively Corrupt Activist Judge Scheme Going

[Care4all]

The operative phrases are “if” and “conflict of interest.” Here the if is not met and there is no conflict of interest. It is bizzaro world to pretend there is.

But why do you think the "if" is not met?

 

[Rogue AI]

It didnt??? Why not?

His dissent was consistent to all his previous rulings.

 

[Care4all]

His dissent was consistent to all his previous rulings.

Really? I don't see that...

How do you come to that opinion?

 

[Rogue AI]

Really? I don't see that...

How do you come to that opinion?

Thomas takes the most literal view of the Constitution of all the Justices. You can always tell which side of an issue he will go. Even if he's the only one.

 

[hadit]

Heheh - I totally forgot about that!

Judge Thomas would also talk about his own “sexual prowess” in workplace conversations, Ms. Hill said. And he once mentioned a pornographic film whose star was called “Long Dong Silver,” which turned into an infamous name in American political lore.

“It would have been more comfortable to remain silent,” she said. “But when I was asked by a representative of this committee to report my experience, I felt that I had to tell the truth. I could not keep silent.”

You're relying on the word of the discredited accuser for that.

 

[hadit]

You know that Thomas was picked for the court because of his race.

Oh, THAT'S why Joe Biden opposed him.

 

[Care4all]

Thomas takes the most literal view of the Constitution of all the Justices. You can always tell which side of an issue he will go. Even if he's the only one.

He's never been a sole dissenter....thay I am aware of....

And what in the constitution would even remotely make him dissent?

 

[Rogue AI]

He's never been a sole dissenter....thay I am aware of....

And what in the constitution would even remotely make him dissent?

In this case the Constitution creates the office of the president. It does not specify the privilege between one president to next. Default goes to the office, not individuals or timelines.

 

[Care4all]

In this case the Constitution creates the office of the president. It does not specify the privilege between one president to next. Default goes to the office, not individuals or timelines.

The office of the president, gave permission for the office of the president to turn over the records.

Thomas dissented with that....???

 

[JustAGuy1]

In this case the Constitution creates the office of the president. It does not specify the privilege between one president to next. Default goes to the office, not individuals or timelines.

You're wasting your time , she is a "Dem can never be wrong and a Pub can never be right" person.

 

[Rogue AI]

The office of the president, gave permission for the office of the president to turn over the records.

Thomas dissented with that....???

The records belong to the office, they are not some tawdry bauble to be passed along.

 

[Care4all]

The records belong to the office, they are not some tawdry bauble to be passed along.

Nope. The records belong to WE THE PEOPLE, not a former President or present one.

 

[Rogue AI]

Nope. The records belong to WE THE PEOPLE, not a former President or present one.

Depending on what's in them, maybe.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Many many people do have an interest, but not all people have been pubically vocal, or have access to the president's chief of staff to direct him, or is married to a justice of the supreme court, giving them more access to one party in the cases the court may receive.

Come on, stop being so obtuse!

Of course it is a conflict of interest and justice Thomas should recuse himself.

Her interest is because she's vocal? In public?

Where's the conflict of interest?

Maybe you should post the definition you're using?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Ginny is actively involved in a case her husband may hear in the court.

Sounds like one case, not many cases.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I say Roberts is furious and might even publicly ask for Thomas resignation after the confirmation...

Who cares what Roberts says? He's not in charge.

 

[lennypartiv]

Justice Thomas knew, or should have known, that his wife was an activist in promoting the developments that eventually lead to the request for those documents. As such, he should have recused.

8-1 is not a testament to Justice Thomas independent thinking.
It is a testament to his poor judgment.

And it reflects poorly on this court. And on Justice Roberts, the Chief Justice and the administrator and enforcer of propriety.

Yes it reflects poorly on the Supreme Court. We have 8 justices who don't care that there was voter fraud in 2020.

 

[Lastamender]

Ginny is actively involved in a case her husband may hear in the court.

That is a conflict of interest for justice Thomas, which under the law, a cause for him to recuse himself.

Easy peasy!

There is a conflict of interest with Joe and China. Why doesn't that bother you?

 

[Lastamender]

No one has commented about the legality of her actions...

Her husband didn't recluse himself from a case that involved her... He was the one no vote to stop her text messages being looked at...

This deeply damages the reputation of the SC impartiality... This should be very serious, I say Roberts is furious and might even publicly ask for Thomas resignation after the confirmation... This goes to the bone of Roberts (and other justices on both sides) beliefs about the court. Roberts is trying to keep the SC non political and judicial, Thomas have massively undermined that...

You have no idea what the Thomas's talk about. Is Clarence in the text message group? You people are desperate and still covering up the fraud.

 

[hadit]

There is a conflict of interest with Joe and China. Why doesn't that bother you?

And that's where democrats typically drop the ball. They never seem to think what they do will be used against them.