Three women came forward to accuse Bill Clinton: Juanita Broaddrick, Paula Jones and Kathleen Willey. There is a public records to explore as each of the above have been investigated.
Juanita Broaddrick:
Signed an affidavit denying that anything happened and swore under oath nothing took place.
Paula Jones:
Case was fully investigated and dismissed.
Kathleen Willey:
Case was fully investigated by Ken Starr, a GOP appointed Special Prosecutor who determined she lied under oath.
Additionally there are no tapes, recordings or witnesses of Bill Clinton saying he abuses women, gropes them or assaults them.
Yes, he has cheated on his wife.
Now contrast that with the trump* history, public admissions on how he treats and objectifies women of all ages from Tic Tacs to sexist rhetoric and now dozens of women confirming Trump’s history and admissions.
Unless you have any other FACTS that state otherwise, the rightwing rapist/harassers/child molestors/groper defenders need to cut it out and face up to the toxicity on their side.
Dear
MarcATL
1. for Juanita Broaddrick, the issue has come up about whether she felt pressured to deny rape or other claims against Clinton when she signed those affidavits.
Juanita Broaddrick, the Woman Who Accused Bill Clinton of Rape, Is Back in the Spotlight
Although she was granted immunity from perjury, her testimony about being raped could not be proven either way because it was so long ago in the past with any evidence gone.
So it's a matter of he said/she said. The issue of falsifying sworn affidavits is a separate issue and has been argued both ways: as part of the culture that silences victims out of fear of political retalitation by powerful people such as the Clintons and their camp; and as part of the legal and political abuse of paying people to use for political points in media against opponents.
Given that the political manipulations can go EITHER WAY, either silencing victims or exploiting cases to push false accusations in the media,
it all boils down to whether you believe Juanita's account that she keeps saying is true, but blames the political and legal system for why it can never be pursued.
Bill Clinton 'rape' victim Juanita Broaddrick tells of lasting trauma of 1978 'attack' | Daily Mail Online
2. As for admitted problems that Bill Clinton has, Hillary Clinton blamed his problems on growing up with an abusive past since childhood:
New book says Hillary Clinton blamed husband's infidelity on abuse as a child
Only he knows how much his abusive past and consequent behavior
really manifested as sexual harassment and abuse of women by political coercion.
If Louis CK has admitted that his position of power rendered it unethical to ask consent of women who were under his stronger influence,
then this same imbalance of power applies to Clinton and Lewinsky even though she "consented" as a legally responsible and competent adult.
The fact they had a professional relationship and it was part of public service and conducted on govt property and/or time made it more improper.
If you just want to argue about the ethics concerning this established case
where Clinton did lie and deny sexual relations under oath,
that's plenty right there.
It was wrongful for govt to have to intrude on personal relations and problems,
where normally govt has no business going, and
which of course would naturally result in anyone trying to deny it to keep govt out of personal problems,
but that's further reason why Clinton should never have engaged in any such relations
in the course of govt duty and on govt grounds especially involving others in govt work.
In general, I find these cases speak to LEGAL ABUSE where the lawyers and judges all making their profession and profits off
keeping them and their cohorts in positions of power to keep controlling what gets redressed and what gets buried and neglected.
I think we would do MORE service to the public by addressing the LEGAL ABUSE of court judicial and govt power
to either exploit or censor cases of abuse. And that applies to more than just rape and sexual abuse/harassment cases.
The cases of lives or property lost to abuse of authority are more broad in scope.
I am hoping that people look beyond just the rape cases and accusations coming out of Hollywood and DC,
and get ready to address the greater far reaching problem of LEGAL ABUSE of courts, govt and access to justice and DEFENSE and political abuse of party.
