Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See…

I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.


It is essentially a secret to the general public who doesn't follow these things....
It's no secret Bernie is a socialist and that he's doing pretty well. Socialism no longer has the negative connotations it used to.
What type of socialist is he?
according to iceweasel, he is a socialist with a good reputation.
 
:eusa_shhh: We aren't suppose to worry ourselves over this. Just like Obama connections with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. Associations with certain people only counts if they are a Republican.

snip:
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 areObama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.

Don’t know who they are? Don’t worry, most people don’t — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.

In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.

Norris said that “the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of ‘a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.’

“I echo again that it’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others,” Norris continued.

all of the article here:
Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See… SPREAD THIS - Occupy Liberals


:cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo::cuckoo:
 
You prove my point. voiceofreason is clueless also.

Do you do anything other than popcorn farts?

You obviously don't understand the constitution. Are you one of those constitutional conservatives without a clue?
That far left plan is competition with the far right's plan to overload the system with military spending so that social security, medicare, medicaid, etc., can be slashed and prevent a welfare state.
Huh? What orifice did you pull that out of? Besides, funding the military is in the constitution, social programs are not.

There sure are a lot of rookie libtards infesting the forum lately, where are you guys getting your marching orders from?
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.

Isn't that the standard pitch?
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.


It is essentially a secret to the general public who doesn't follow these things....

yep, and if you bring it you will get beat down for it just like with Obama and the Rev. Wright
 
:eusa_shhh: We aren't suppose to worry ourselves over this. Just like Obama connections with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. Associations with certain people only counts if they are a Republican.

snip:
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 areObama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.

Don’t know who they are? Don’t worry, most people don’t — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.

In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.

Norris said that “the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of ‘a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.’

“I echo again that it’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others,” Norris continued.

all of the article here:
Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See… SPREAD THIS - Occupy Liberals



I really can't for the life of me take Norris seriously. Perhaps another messenger is in order, one with a smidgeon of credibility.
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.

Isn't that the standard pitch?
Never heard it before. It couldn't be standard if socialism had no chance.
 
That far left plan is competition with the far right's plan to overload the system with military spending so that social security, medicare, medicaid, etc., can be slashed and prevent a welfare state.
Huh? What orifice did you pull that out of? Besides, funding the military is in the constitution, social programs are not.

There sure are a lot of rookie libtards infesting the forum lately, where are you guys getting your marching orders from?

they hate the military until they are needed to protect their lame butts
I am a veteran of the Army, which branch did you serve in? Oh and my liberal wife is a veteran of the Army also....
Staph is just a useful idiot who has been sucking on the government tit all her life
 
:eusa_shhh: We aren't suppose to worry ourselves over this. Just like Obama connections with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. Associations with certain people only counts if they are a Republican.

snip:
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 areObama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.

Don’t know who they are? Don’t worry, most people don’t — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.

In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.

Norris said that “the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of ‘a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.’

“I echo again that it’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others,” Norris continued.

all of the article here:
Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See… SPREAD THIS - Occupy Liberals



I really can't for the life of me take Norris seriously. Perhaps another messenger is in order, one with a smidgeon of credibility.
The messenger is unimportant.
 
:eusa_shhh: We aren't suppose to worry ourselves over this. Just like Obama connections with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. Associations with certain people only counts if they are a Republican.

snip:
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 areObama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.

Don’t know who they are? Don’t worry, most people don’t — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.

In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.

Norris said that “the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of ‘a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.’

“I echo again that it’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others,” Norris continued.

all of the article here:
Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See… SPREAD THIS - Occupy Liberals



I really can't for the life of me take Norris seriously. Perhaps another messenger is in order, one with a smidgeon of credibility.
whatever, I posted more LINKS about it. so bury your head up your yahoo, who cares
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.

Isn't that the standard pitch?
Never heard it before. It couldn't be standard if socialism had no chance.

I've been hearing "the commies/socialists are coming" for over 6 decades.
 
Who? And why top post? Are you trying to start a new trend?

You prove my point. voiceofreason is clueless also.

Do you do anything other than popcorn farts?

You obviously don't understand the constitution. Are you one of those constitutional conservatives without a clue?
That far left plan is competition with the far right's plan to overload the system with military spending so that social security, medicare, medicaid, etc., can be slashed and prevent a welfare state.
Huh? What orifice did you pull that out of? Besides, funding the military is in the constitution, social programs are not.

There sure are a lot of rookie libtards infesting the forum lately, where are you guys getting your marching orders from?
 
:eusa_shhh: We aren't suppose to worry ourselves over this. Just like Obama connections with Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, etc. Associations with certain people only counts if they are a Republican.

snip:
Most people think that the two most important names in the Democratic race for the White House in 2016 areObama and Clinton. However, the two names you should be paying attention to are Cloward and Piven.

Don’t know who they are? Don’t worry, most people don’t — but conservative commentator and generally kicka** guy Chuck Norris is going to make sure they do.

In an op-ed for WND, Norris explained that the two people — Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven — were academics who came up with a plan to introduce permanent socialism in the United States.

Norris said that “the Cloward-Piven strategy is a political plan created in 1966 by two Columbia University sociologists to overload the U.S. public welfare system, the goal being to replace it with a national system of ‘a guaranteed annual income and thus an end to poverty.’

“I echo again that it’s neither a coincidence that Obama graduated from Columbia University nor that others who espoused the Cloward-Piven strategy were a group of radicals who have been a part of his life and education: Bill Ayers, Saul Alinsky, Bernardine Dohrn, George Wiley, Frank Marshall Davis, Wade Rathke and George Soros, among others,” Norris continued.

all of the article here:
Chuck Norris Reveals 1 HUGE Piece of Hillary’s Past She Did NOT Want America to See… SPREAD THIS - Occupy Liberals



I really can't for the life of me take Norris seriously. Perhaps another messenger is in order, one with a smidgeon of credibility.
whatever, I posted more LINKS about it. so bury your head up your yahoo, who cares
Where is the links to back up how liberals hate the military?
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.


It is essentially a secret to the general public who doesn't follow these things....

yep, and if you bring it you will get beat down for it just like with Obama and the Rev. Wright
Okay Staph, that is enough for the time being. Now put the bottle down, gather your scrap paper together and put your crayons back in the box. It's nap time.
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.

Isn't that the standard pitch?
Never heard it before. It couldn't be standard if socialism had no chance.

I've been hearing "the commies/socialists are coming" for over 6 decades.
Yeah but now it's "They're here. And they want your shit."
 
I don't think it's exactly a secret at this point. Who is going to be surprised? There's little difference when a socialist is running well in the Democratic nomination process and the other one can't articulate a difference. Do enough people care? That's the question. Taking over public ed was a crucial move on the leftists part and have moved us so far left it's questionable if the capitalists can defeat them.

I see this election as capitalism versus socialism. Everything else is just noise.

Isn't that the standard pitch?
Never heard it before. It couldn't be standard if socialism had no chance.

I've been hearing "the commies/socialists are coming" for over 6 decades.
Yeah but now it's "They're here. And they want your shit."
Not even the toilet wants your shit...
 
You obviously do not know what are socialism and capitalism.
You obviously are full of shit.

No, he's right. All you know to do is salivate like Pavlov's dogs when you hear the terms. You already live in a society with a blended economy, and you like it when you're on the gettin' end. You just don't like it when it's "those" people who get a slice. If you didn't want your share you'd be out in the wilderness somewhere isolated and doing everything on your own.
 
the troll showed it's ugly self. woohoo how impressive:trolls:
 

Forum List

Back
Top