Hoffstra; et al,
Arab Terrorists and Radical Islamic Operators and fundamentalist, generally follow the theme set by the Arab Convention for the Suppression of Terrorism, of April 1998. But it has a different slant.
(OBSERVATION)terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.
no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.
next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.
What part of this do you feel is incorrect?
Remember: The nationals of an occupying power, Israeli citizens, are specifically excluded from "civilian" status by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
(COMMENT)
It is not uncommon for us to hear the Article 13 Jihadist and Article 10 Feday'een to claim they can kill anyone, anytime, anywhere, in the pursuit of neutralizing the US and Israel; civilian, or not.
Remember:
Under Arab rules, this is entirely acceptable.
The Palestinians had every legal right to reject giving half of their country to foreigners.
Why do you always imply that they did something wrong?
Most Respectfully,
R
We're not talking about the West Bank. Everyone who is a citizen of Israel is a ..well....citizen... There is no occupation outside the West Bank. Once again, you make no sense.