Chronicle of Palestinian terrorism

[P F Tinmore]

Let's have some tangible proof that what you say is true. I'm right. You're dead wrong and that's a fact, Jack.

the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;

U.S. Law Definition of Terrorism

every official definition of terrorism includes that it targets civilian non-combatants.

Even when the definition of protected persons is set out in this way, it may seem rather complicated. Nevertheless, disregarding points of detail, it will be seen that there are two main classes of protected person: (1) ' enemy nationals ' within the national territory of each of the Parties to the conflict and (2) ' the whole population ' of occupied territories (excluding nationals of the Occupying Power)

</title> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/xsp/.ibmxspres/.mini/css/@Da&@Ib&2Tfxsp.css&2TfxspLTR.css.css"> <script type="text/javascript" src="/xsp/.ibmxspres/dojoroot-1.6.1/dojo/dojo.js" djConfig="locale: 'fr-ch'"></script> <script type=

 

[P F Tinmore]

Terrorist defined:

Anyone we do not like.

 

[Hossfly]

What the hell was it then? Are you on crack?

Marines are a legitimate military target.

sorry, but killing Marines ain't terrorism.

They were on a peace keeping mission. That's like saying the UN peace keepers are a legitimate target.

These Ayrab intellectual giants make up their own version of rules. Like, the Ft. Hood shooter didn't commit terrorism, he was on a Mission For Allah. The victims were "enemy combatants". Makes sense.

 

[Hossfly]

Let's have some tangible proof that what you say is true. I'm right. You're dead wrong and that's a fact, Jack.

the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;

U.S. Law Definition of Terrorism

every official definition of terrorism includes that it targets civilian non-combatants.

I understand now! That's why Obamanation won't classify the Ft. Hood shooting as "terrorism". Ol' Abdul Hassan was on a Mission From Allah and killed a gaggle of Enemy Combatant infidels that makes it a combat action.

 

[Hoffstra]

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

 

[toastman]

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

Yes, which means Hamas is a terrorist group since they have never really distinguished between combatants and civilians

 

[Hoffstra]

Yes, which means Hamas is a terrorist group since they have never really distinguished between combatants and civilians

yes, Hamas is a terrorist group.

duhh..

 

[georgephillip]

What the hell was it then? Are you on crack?

Marines are a legitimate military target.

sorry, but killing Marines ain't terrorism.

Marines at war are legitimate targets.

Marines on a peacekeeping mission are not at war and it was terrorism, Captain Knowledge.

Typical Ayrab mentality doesn't cut it.

American Exceptionalism cuts even less.
Those dead Marines were taking sides in a civil war.
Can you guess whose?

"All of this, according to Robert Fisk, served to generate ill will against the MNF among Lebanese Muslims and especially among the Shiites living in the slums of West Beirut and around the Beirut International Airport where the U.S. Marines were located.

"Lebanese Muslims were manipulated into believing the MNF, and the Americans in particular, were unfairly siding with the Maronite Christians in their attempt to dominate Lebanon.[44][45][46]

"Muslim feelings against the American presence were 'exacerbated when [counter-battery] missiles lobbed by the U.S. Sixth Fleet hit innocent by-standers in the Druze-dominated Shuf mountains.'[47]

"Colonel Timothy J. Geraghty, the commander of the U.S. 24th Marine Amphibious Unit (MAU) deployed as peacekeepers in Beirut during the incident, has said that the American and the French headquarters were targeted primarily because of 'who we were and what we represented[48] and that,
It is noteworthy that the United States provided direct naval gunfire support [which fired a total of 360 5-inch rounds between 10:04 A.M. and 3:00 PM.] -- which I strongly opposed for a week -- to the Lebanese Army at a mountain village called Suq-al-Garb on September 19 and that the French conducted an air strike on September 23 in the Bekaa Valley.

"American support removed any lingering doubts of our neutrality, and I stated to my staff at the time that we were going to pay in blood for this decision.[49]"

1983 Beirut barracks bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[Viktor]

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

Yes, which means Hamas is a terrorist group since they have never really distinguished between combatants and civilians

Note Article 13 which says they don't want peace.

The Avalon Project : Hamas Covenant 1988

 

[Hoffstra]

Note Article 13 which says they don't want peace.

The Avalon Project : Hamas Covenant 1988

Hamas controls Gaza.

big deal.

 

[Viktor]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamas

 

[RoccoR]

Hoffstra; et al,

Arab Terrorists and Radical Islamic Operators and fundamentalist, generally follow the theme set by the Arab Convention for the Suppression of Terrorism, of April 1998. But it has a different slant.

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

(OBSERVATION)

Preamble

Affirming the right of peoples to combat foreign occupation and aggression by whatever means, including armed struggle, in order to liberate their territories and secure their right to self-determination, and independence and to do so in such a manner as to preserve the territorial integrity of each Arab country, of the foregoing being in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and with the Organization's resolutions.​

2. Terrorism

Any act or threat of violence, whatever its motives or purposes, that occurs in the advancement of an individual or collective criminal agenda and seeking to sow panic among people, causing fear by harming them, or placing their lives, liberty or security in danger, or seeking to cause damage to the environment or to public or private installations or property or to occupying or seizing them, or seeking to jeopardize a national resources.​

SOURCE: THE ARAB CONVENTION

(COMMENT)

It is not uncommon for us to hear the Article 13 Jihadist and Article 10 Feday'een to claim they can kill anyone, anytime, anywhere, in the pursuit of neutralizing the US and Israel; civilian, or not.

Remember:

6. The Secretary-General has been informed by the Arab Higher Committee that is determined to persist in its rejection of the partition plan and in its refusal to recognize the resolution of the Assembly and “anything deriving therefrom”. The Subsequent communication of 6 February to the Secretary-General from the representative of the Arab Higher Committee set forth the following conclusions of the Arab Higher Committee Delegation:

g. The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition.​

“The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out – man women and child."​

SOURCE: A/AC.21/9 S/676 16 February 1948

Under Arab rules, this is entirely acceptable.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

Yes, which means Hamas is a terrorist group since they have never really distinguished between combatants and civilians

Note Article 13 which says they don't want peace.

The Avalon Project : Hamas Covenant 1988

Article 13 does not say that.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hoffstra; et al,

Arab Terrorists and Radical Islamic Operators and fundamentalist, generally follow the theme set by the Arab Convention for the Suppression of Terrorism, of April 1998. But it has a different slant.

terrorism is an act of violence upon non-combatant civilians.

no amount of Israeli legalese can change this.

next they'll tell us that kids throwing stones at Israeli soldiers in the West Bank, is also terrorism.

(OBSERVATION)

Preamble

Affirming the right of peoples to combat foreign occupation and aggression by whatever means, including armed struggle, in order to liberate their territories and secure their right to self-determination, and independence and to do so in such a manner as to preserve the territorial integrity of each Arab country, of the foregoing being in accordance with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and with the Organization's resolutions.​

2. Terrorism

Any act or threat of violence, whatever its motives or purposes, that occurs in the advancement of an individual or collective criminal agenda and seeking to sow panic among people, causing fear by harming them, or placing their lives, liberty or security in danger, or seeking to cause damage to the environment or to public or private installations or property or to occupying or seizing them, or seeking to jeopardize a national resources.​

SOURCE: THE ARAB CONVENTION

What part of this do you feel is incorrect?

Remember: The nationals of an occupying power, Israeli citizens, are specifically excluded from "civilian" status by the Fourth Geneva Convention.

(COMMENT)

It is not uncommon for us to hear the Article 13 Jihadist and Article 10 Feday'een to claim they can kill anyone, anytime, anywhere, in the pursuit of neutralizing the US and Israel; civilian, or not.

Remember:

6. The Secretary-General has been informed by the Arab Higher Committee that is determined to persist in its rejection of the partition plan and in its refusal to recognize the resolution of the Assembly and “anything deriving therefrom”. The Subsequent communication of 6 February to the Secretary-General from the representative of the Arab Higher Committee set forth the following conclusions of the Arab Higher Committee Delegation:

g. The Arabs of Palestine made a solemn declaration before the United Nations, before God and history, that they will never submit or yield to any power going to Palestine to enforce partition.​

“The only way to establish partition is first to wipe them out – man women and child."​

SOURCE: A/AC.21/9 S/676 16 February 1948

Under Arab rules, this is entirely acceptable.

The Palestinians had every legal right to reject giving half of their country to foreigners.

Why do you always imply that they did something wrong?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[docmauser1]

The Palestinians had every legal right to reject giving half of their country to foreigners.

So, who was that shakh, emir, effendi, sultan, president, prime-minister of that "country" to back the claim up?

 

[Indofred]

I'm sure it's longer than that.

Is there a purpose here?

Yes - The OP is trying to smoke Israel's attacks and invasions by making out Palestinian people are terrorists.
There were no Palestinian attacks on Israel until Israel started the wars.

 

[Indofred]

I find this really odd.
Many of the right wing, pro-Israel posters here are anti immigration into the US of A but support foreigners taking over a country.

I'll bet their shrinks are on hazard pay.

 

[Hossfly]

I find this really odd.
Many of the right wing, pro-Israel posters here are anti immigration into the US of A but support foreigners taking over a country.

I'll bet their shrinks are on hazard pay.

So what does your shrink say to you, Freddie, for converting to Islam even after you must have been aware how Islam has no tolerance for others whom are consider Infidels, and many of the followers of Islam have no problem even murdering these Infidels. Meanwhile, you are completely overlooking that at one time there was an Amnesty Program for millions of illegals, and something is being worked out now. Can you tell us of any Muslim country that is willing to make legal citizens out of the people from many different countries who are working there now. Would Indonesia be willing to accept millions of illegals into that country and then make them citizens and allowing them to practice their religious beliefs in peace? If not, why are you making a big deal of all the illegals in the U.S. who crossed our Southern border for jobs. Hmm, I wonder if the Korans and prayer rugs found by the Border Patrol means that the Muslims are also sneaking in here. Are they looking for jobs, or are they here to try and convert Americans to Islam -- or are they planning some heinous act here like 9/11?

 

[RoccoR]

P F Tinmore; et al,

Who says it was "their country?"

The Palestinians had every legal right to reject giving half of their country to foreigners.

Why do you always imply that they did something wrong?

(COMMENT)

• Who gave the Arab Palestinians a country?
• Where was this spelled-out?
• When did it happen?

And don't start with the "right to self-determination." You know that did not come about until after the League of Nation was started. The division of the Ottoman Empire and the transfer of control of the territory to the Allied Powers was before that phase was invented; before the Covenant of the League of Nations.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[toastman]

P F Tinmore; et al,

Who says it was "their country?"

The Palestinians had every legal right to reject giving half of their country to foreigners.

Why do you always imply that they did something wrong?

(COMMENT)

• Who gave the Arab Palestinians a country?
• Where was this spelled-out?
• When did it happen?

And don't start with the "right to self-determination." You know that did not come about until after the League of Nation was started. The division of the Ottoman Empire and the transfer of control of the territory to the Allied Powers was before that phase was invented; before the Covenant of the League of Nations.

Most Respectfully,
R

I would love to see these questions answered as well.