- Aug 4, 2009
- 283,087
- 150,155
- 2,615
The Veto power should be what it is- a check and balance. It should be there to veto things when the legistlature acts irresponsibly, like spending money the state doesn't have. This isn't a case where a veto was justified.
Well, it was inevitable. Christie had to do it to stay in good graces with the GOP/TP. He may well have an entirely different personal opinion on this.
.
As George Bush used to say........I am the decider
Christie has decided that he gets to make the call on whether NJ can have gay marriage or not. As governor, that is his right
But, like Bush, Christie now owns the issue. If he runs for VP, "Christie vetoed gay marriage" will be constantly brought up. If he runs for President, Christie vetoed gay marriage will be constantly brought up
Gay marriage is inevitable in this country and Chris Christie will be looked at as the George Wallace standing at the schoolhouse door of gay rights