None of that changes the fact that islam is pure evil. I'll not discuss this with you anymore until you read the info in that link I posted. until you do, you really don't understand islam. I know it's pretty long, so take your time. But please read it.
Hi
Mr.Right I read through all the chapters but not all the details which weren't necessary to get the gist of the history. You and I are talking about two totally different contexts and periods of history. Yes I agree it is wrongful to try to repeat any of the religious wars and atrocities that Mohammad led to create that empire.
Today, the Muslims who respect God's TRUE laws include the natural laws of "Golden Rule and treating others with respect humanity and peace" and respect the laws and authority of the land. So this precludes and makes ILLEGAL the entire content and context of all the abuses, oppression, warfare and political attack and control over people and religion which is either cited or referenced indirectly in that overview. All similar cases past and future are clearly illegal by human rights laws and common sense of what is the greater good of society.
None of that can be practiced in civil society without breaking laws - God's laws, natural laws, civil laws, and simple common sense and reason about how relations and society works.
I agree with you that anyone who teaches to follow ANYTHING that violates civil laws, natural laws, the faith of other people, and pure common sense and reason cannot be truth, so any belief in that cannot be true either. So if YOU and others point to this historic and political cult abuse and call this Islam then I agree with you, of course, that is completely false and for political control only.
What I am talking about when I refer to Islam is when
* Islam means submitting to God's will as a peaceful humbling and natural positive process out of respect for all people and all life, in the same spirit as Buddhism when it is peaceful and not politically abused for power. IE not any kind of political submission by force, of guilt fear or other negative motivation that is less than true natural free and right for that person and for all humanity as God's true will.
As Mustafaa Carroll stated about "no compulsion in religion":
any faith must be freely chosen and can't be forced or it it is false. it is not real if it is only because someone is forced.
* Shariah refers to all practices of the faith, including charity which one follows out of respect and free will and reverence and not for any false or political reasons. IE does not allow for abuse by govt to impose control punish or force people in violation of due process which is a natural law given by God as part of human nature.
* woman are revered with higher respect as mothers, even more than men, as taught in the Bible that mothers are honored before fathers.
The people I know who teach Islam this way are more in harmony with the Bahai, UU, Christian and humanitarians. So that is what I see as true to God's laws.
They are not under the oppressive cultural or political regimes as in countries that don't have a strong Christian or Constitutional foundation as America has.
Like the Christians and Americans who come from a free background, I will not be able to look at the OLD ways that Islam (or Christianity) was taught with wars and genocide justified as God's ordination.
Since Scriptural laws in Christianity, including understanding Christ Jesus as Restorative Justice universal to all humanity, and natural laws in Constitutionalism are divine and part of the laws and prophets given by God, then any true Muslim Jew or Christian following God consistently by conscience would not agree with any violation or abuse in conflict with any of these laws.
So if you call all this Jihadism and Mohammad's political oppression to be Islam of course I agree that is completely a political cult to abuse power for oppression.
I am happy to ask all the Muslims who believe in something else to consider changing the name of what they believe so it is never confused with this other oppression and abuse still going on today.
You and I are talking about two totally different tracks that people are on.
One is peaceful and in keeping with Christianity and Constitutionalism and working for peace through civil due process to correct the very wrongs going on in the world from people abusing religion or politics.
One is warmongering and abusing power that causes endless suffering and hell on earth.
These clearly cannot be called the same religion.
if there are too many people calling the hell bound atrocities as Islam
it would be easier to ask the law abiding peaceful Muslims to call themselves something else to distinguish themselves as not believing or committing or submitting to any such thing.
I believe we should have a constitutional convention about political beliefs.
Constitutionalism is one, Democrats have turned the party platform into a political religion,
and the issue of Jihadism shariah and Muslim beliefs is another area to distinguish which is what.
If the beliefs of Muslims is not aligned with any of what you cited about Mohammad, then
this needs to be separated and resolved.
We need to have consistent terms for which people are following which beliefs or not,
so that nobody enables religious cult abuses, and those who really practice that can be
isolated and removed from civil society and live under their own laws without imposing or endangering any other person group or nation.
first step is to agree on terms.
So if you want to call all this atrocity and oppression to be Islam
then the peaceful believers need to be called something else so there is no confusion.