Try reading some facts rather than Fredo Cuomo's hazy impressions of a complicated cover up.
CrowdStrike and the Impeachment Frenzy | The American Spectator | Politics Is Too Important To Be Taken Seriously.
You people are morons. That's why the Russian collusion hoax was nothing more than a cloud of
Adam Schiff's fart dust..and the Ukraine circus is losing any traction whatsoever and you have to get your raw meat from a two bit source like Raw Story.
From your source:
"For, when the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI learned of the hacking claim, they asked to examine the server.
But the DNC refused."
There was no server to inspect. The entire network of 140 or more computers were infected. The forensic investigation had to ...
Bears in the Midst: Intrusion into the Democratic National Committee »
From your source:
"The time stamps contained in the released computer files’ metadata establish that, at 6:45 p.m. July 5, 2016, 1,976 megabytes (not megabits) of data were downloaded from the DNC’s server. This took 87 seconds, which means the transfer rate was 22.7 megabytes per second, a speed, according to VIPS, that “is much faster than what is physically possible with a hack.” Such a speed could be accomplished only by direct connection of a portable storage device to the server."
Why the latest theory about the DNC not being hacked is probably wrong
"But, said Barger and other experts, that overlooks the possibility the files were copied multiple times before being released, something that may be more probable than not in a bureaucracy like Russian intelligence.
“A hacker might have downloaded it to one computer, then shared it by USB to an air gapped [off the internet] network for translation, then copied by a different person for analysis, then brought a new USB to an entirely different air gapped computer to determine a strategy all before it was packaged for Guccifer 2.0 to leak,” said Barger.
Every time the files were copied, depending on the method they were transmitted, there would be a new chance for the metadata to be changed.
Hultquist said the date that Forensicator believes that the files were downloaded, based on the metadata, is almost definitely not the date the files were removed from the DNC.
That date, July 5, 2016, was far later than the April dates when the DNC hackers registered “
electionleaks.com” and “DCLeaks.com.” Hulquist noted that the DNC hackers likely had stolen files by the time they began determining their strategy to post them."
The July date is also months after the DNC brought in FireEye competitor CrowdStrike to remove the hackers from their network and well after Crowdstrike first attributed the attack to Russia.
