Chris christie doubles down on treason - Slams GOP for not giving him money

[auditor0007]

[

The right wingers truly believe the reason they lost this last election is because they didn't run more people like Todd Akin and Richard Murdock. It's ******* hilarious.

They'd have won with anyone other than romney. Romney wouldn't go on the attack and nobody likes a coward.

Rick Perry? Newt Gingrich? Maybe Michelle Bachmann? How about Sarah Palin? Yea, you're right; any of them would have beat Obama.

 

[turzovka]

Another Birfer. Will the fruitloops ever cease crawling out of the woodwork?

As usual the loony libulals evade the issue and make personal attacks. Why can't they realize that by such actions, they're telling the board they know they are wrong? HAHA

Just like their liberal media counterparts, they wouldn’t dare try to explain all the incongruities so defined by experts of this latest rendition of a birth certificate. No, much easier to sit on a fence and laugh at the wingnut minority crying foul. We are “birfers” and that’s all they have to say to win the popularity contest. Reminds me of the Shroud of Turin. “It’s a fake, don’t you know? But don’t bother me with all those crazy Christian sites or scientific analyses detailing all those inexplicable attributes of that image on the cloth, the case is closed.”

Human nature has a strong aversion to being made uncomfortable.

 

[Stephanie]

[

The right wingers truly believe the reason they lost this last election is because they didn't run more people like Todd Akin and Richard Murdock. It's ******* hilarious.

They'd have won with anyone other than romney. Romney wouldn't go on the attack and nobody likes a coward.

Rick Perry? Newt Gingrich? Maybe Michelle Bachmann? How about Sarah Palin? Yea, you're right; any of them would have beat Obama.

No, according to you Obama worshippers nobody could beat the all mighty Obama..
doesn't matter enjoy what's coming at you for it

 

[JakeStarkey]

Romney fought hard, was no coward, and used very little the props of the ultra right or the libertarians. If he had, he would have lost by another 5%.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Romney fought hard, was no coward, and used very little the props of the ultra right or the libertarians. If he had, he would have lost by another 5%.

He didn't fight at all. He faced a failed incumbent and needed to point out all the awful things obozo has done. But he refused to do that. I think he was hired to be a good loser just like Kerry in 2004.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Rick Perry? Newt Gingrich? Maybe Michelle Bachmann? How about Sarah Palin? Yea, you're right; any of them would have beat Obama.

Any repub could have won if he had gone on the attack. Romney refused like the coward he is.

 

[ShootSpeeders]

A craving for notoriety coupled to damaged self-image and moral obtuseness drives these birfer creeps.

So why don't you explain why obozo's own literary agency said he was born and raised in kenya? It was not an off-hand commen, mind you. They printed the claim in their brochure for obozo!!! Please explain to this birfer creep how that could happen.

Based on our conversation in another thread I was hoping that you being stupid there was an aberration but I see that it was not and you are just stupid

HAHAHA. More name-calling which proves even you know Obozo himself told his literary agency he was born in kenya.

 

[JKVegas]

So why don't you explain why obozo's own literary agency said he was born and raised in kenya?

Funny ................ he doesn't SOUND Kenyan ...............

 

[Synthaholic]

Meanwhile....

treason?!

To these vermin?

14 Republicans Plotted to Commit Treason

n his latest book, entitle, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives", Robert Draper wrote that during a four hour, "invitation only" meeting with the Republican Party Hate-Propaganda Minister, Frank Luntz, the below listed senior Republican law makers plotted to sabotage, undermine and destroy American’s Economy.

Shouldn't accusations of a high crime be saved for crimes against country, rather than someone brave enough to act against a bunch of spoiled brats who long ago proved beyond all doubt that they're unworthy of public office?

:HYPOCRISY ALERT:

All of a sudden obama was born in Kenya isn't sounding so far fetched.

Not to be outdone, you leftards have to cook up a conspiracy of your own aye?

Why did you turn off your rep, you *****?

 

[JakeStarkey]

MR faced an incumbent who was holding a more than 46% popularity (enough for Truman and Eisenhower and Clinton in similar elections in 48 and 56 and 96), MR campaigned hard, MR certainly was hired by no one to fail, neither was JK in 2004, and I think your head does not work well.

We GOP got beat because we are carrying dead weight from the ultra right and the libertarians.

Romney fought hard, was no coward, and used very little the props of the ultra right or the libertarians. If he had, he would have lost by another 5%.

He didn't fight at all. He faced a failed incumbent and needed to point out all the awful things obozo has done. But he refused to do that. I think he was hired to be a good loser just like Kerry in 2004.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one is concerned when a wack is concerned about being called exactly what he is, in your case 'stupid'.

So why don't you explain why obozo's own literary agency said he was born and raised in kenya? It was not an off-hand commen, mind you. They printed the claim in their brochure for obozo!!! Please explain to this birfer creep how that could happen.

Based on our conversation in another thread I was hoping that you being stupid there was an aberration but I see that it was not and you are just stupid

HAHAHA. More name-calling which proves even you know Obozo himself told his literary agency he was born in kenya.

 

[JKVegas]

Rick Perry? Newt Gingrich? Maybe Michelle Bachmann? How about Sarah Palin? Yea, you're right; any of them would have beat Obama.

Any repub could have won if he had gone on the attack. Romney refused like the coward he is.

This is hilarious.

They attacked. They just didn't come up with a plan to fix the economy that didn't involve deifying the rich and castigating the poor. They didn't read the tea leaves (very ironic, BTW) and see that most Americans don't think that way. That MOST Americans have seen their wealth eroded and have seen that the "job creators" really haven't done that, despite all the tax breaks known to man. They see that all of our middle-class jobs - the good ones you DON'T need life-long debt to be able to get - have been moved off-shore by greedy corporations.

Why is Obamacare even palatable (For the record, I think it fixes nothing)? Clinton tried for health care reform, and was shot down. Know the REAL reason? Because most people were working, most companies were fat enough to give out good health insurance packages, and most people were already covered. So they didn't CARE. Now a lot of them aren't.

The GOP completely misread the feelings of most Americans. Not only did they lose the Presidency, they also lost the Senate. Because, like the Democrats in the late 60's - early 70's, they aren't seeing the change. The presidency became the stronghold of the GOP from 1968-1988. And Clinton was a DINO (Democrat In Name Only). So you can say a rather conservative approach ruled the office for 40 years.

Things have changed. Middle-class people have been screwed (or they THINK they have) and are fighting back. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. They will NOT support any platform that favors the wealthy. THEY want help. They DON'T want radical rhetoric. They want a solution. If the GOP was smart, they could tie into what will become a growing desire of reasonable accommidation. They don't get that by nominating a rich guy who's STUPID enough to say, in PUBLIC, that half of America are freeloaders. And they certainly don't get it by having their Speaker cuss out the Senate Majority leader, like him or NOT.

Romney should have won hands down. A President losing an unpopular war running a struggling economy. Handed to them on a platter. But much like the Democrats in 1972, they nominated someone too far away from what most Americans were worried about.

They blew it.

Wait until 2016. You will see a MUCH different approach from the Grand Old Party. They will toss out the Tea Baggers and the radicals. They will be much more accommidating. Guys like Todd Akin don't have a future.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I think that JKVegas is correct in that if the GOP "buys into" a populist response (1) to assist the Middle Class as well as (2) a commitment to cutting, including defense, the party can succeed. The GOP must abandon the wack wings to the ultra right.

 

[JKVegas]

I think that JKVegas is correct in that if the GOP "buys into" a populist response (1) to assist the Middle Class as well as (2) a commitment to cutting, including defense, the party can succeed. The GOP must abandon the wack wings to the ultra right.

They aren't stupid. This is exactly what they'll do.

Boehner's days are numbered as the Guardian of The Right. OK, that's not quite accurate. I just can't think of any other way to word it. He will have to move toward the center. He will have to give up his hard-line thinking. As the economy sputters along, people will continue to grow more and more frustrated. They are asking for a solution. Mor4e and more people are going to see that the ridiculously expensive education they pay for for their children will NOT get them a job they couldn't get without it. I work with two recent graduates, and they will find this out - in fact, they already HAVE.

ANYONE tying their wagon to the rich will be soundly defeated. Wait until the next gun massacre, and the mid-term elections, and watch how ANY candidate embracing the NRA gets trounced.

Most Americans want law and order, a stop to the violence, and a good job so that they can take care of themselves. Sound familiar? The "Silent Majority"? Most Americans simply don't TRUST the unshackled system of free enterprise any longer.

Whether any of this is actually TRUE or not is irrelevant. It's what people think. An election, in its stripped-down essence, is a popularity contest.

The GOP, for some insane reason, is clinging to an outdated notion. That people BELIEVE in our system as it stands. They don't any more.

 

[Stephanie]

Rick Perry? Newt Gingrich? Maybe Michelle Bachmann? How about Sarah Palin? Yea, you're right; any of them would have beat Obama.

Any repub could have won if he had gone on the attack. Romney refused like the coward he is.

This is hilarious.

They attacked. They just didn't come up with a plan to fix the economy that didn't involve deifying the rich and castigating the poor. They didn't read the tea leaves (very ironic, BTW) and see that most Americans don't think that way. That MOST Americans have seen their wealth eroded and have seen that the "job creators" really haven't done that, despite all the tax breaks known to man. They see that all of our middle-class jobs - the good ones you DON'T need life-long debt to be able to get - have been moved off-shore by greedy corporations.

Why is Obamacare even palatable (For the record, I think it fixes nothing)? Clinton tried for health care reform, and was shot down. Know the REAL reason? Because most people were working, most companies were fat enough to give out good health insurance packages, and most people were already covered. So they didn't CARE. Now a lot of them aren't.

The GOP completely misread the feelings of most Americans. Not only did they lose the Presidency, they also lost the Senate. Because, like the Democrats in the late 60's - early 70's, they aren't seeing the change. The presidency became the stronghold of the GOP from 1968-1988. And Clinton was a DINO (Democrat In Name Only). So you can say a rather conservative approach ruled the office for 40 years.

Things have changed. Middle-class people have been screwed (or they THINK they have) and are fighting back. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. They will NOT support any platform that favors the wealthy. THEY want help. They DON'T want radical rhetoric. They want a solution. If the GOP was smart, they could tie into what will become a growing desire of reasonable accommidation. They don't get that by nominating a rich guy who's STUPID enough to say, in PUBLIC, that half of America are freeloaders. And they certainly don't get it by having their Speaker cuss out the Senate Majority leader, like him or NOT.

Romney should have won hands down. A President losing an unpopular war running a struggling economy. Handed to them on a platter. But much like the Democrats in 1972, they nominated someone too far away from what most Americans were worried about.

They blew it.

Wait until 2016. You will see a MUCH different approach from the Grand Old Party. They will toss out the Tea Baggers and the radicals. They will be much more accommidating. Guys like Todd Akin don't have a future.

Omg, a long winded blowhard know it all..shakes the magic 8 ball and gets this^^
yawn yawn yawn

 

[saveliberty]

can anyone confirm this? The $9b. in hurricane aid is actually going to a federal agency. Seems they disperse the funds and are NEARING a zero balance. That means all the bills have been paid so far. Appears Christie is trying to pork barrel his disaster.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Any repub could have won if he had gone on the attack. Romney refused like the coward he is.

This is hilarious.

They attacked. They just didn't come up with a plan to fix the economy that didn't involve deifying the rich and castigating the poor. They didn't read the tea leaves (very ironic, BTW) and see that most Americans don't think that way. That MOST Americans have seen their wealth eroded and have seen that the "job creators" really haven't done that, despite all the tax breaks known to man. They see that all of our middle-class jobs - the good ones you DON'T need life-long debt to be able to get - have been moved off-shore by greedy corporations.

Why is Obamacare even palatable (For the record, I think it fixes nothing)? Clinton tried for health care reform, and was shot down. Know the REAL reason? Because most people were working, most companies were fat enough to give out good health insurance packages, and most people were already covered. So they didn't CARE. Now a lot of them aren't.

The GOP completely misread the feelings of most Americans. Not only did they lose the Presidency, they also lost the Senate. Because, like the Democrats in the late 60's - early 70's, they aren't seeing the change. The presidency became the stronghold of the GOP from 1968-1988. And Clinton was a DINO (Democrat In Name Only). So you can say a rather conservative approach ruled the office for 40 years.

Things have changed. Middle-class people have been screwed (or they THINK they have) and are fighting back. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. They will NOT support any platform that favors the wealthy. THEY want help. They DON'T want radical rhetoric. They want a solution. If the GOP was smart, they could tie into what will become a growing desire of reasonable accommidation. They don't get that by nominating a rich guy who's STUPID enough to say, in PUBLIC, that half of America are freeloaders. And they certainly don't get it by having their Speaker cuss out the Senate Majority leader, like him or NOT.

Romney should have won hands down. A President losing an unpopular war running a struggling economy. Handed to them on a platter. But much like the Democrats in 1972, they nominated someone too far away from what most Americans were worried about.

They blew it.

Wait until 2016. You will see a MUCH different approach from the Grand Old Party. They will toss out the Tea Baggers and the radicals. They will be much more accommidating. Guys like Todd Akin don't have a future.

Omg, a long winded blowhard know it all..shakes the magic 8 ball and gets this^^
yawn yawn yawn

Oh my heavens, a long winded hard head loud mouth from the ultra right pretend conservative wing who magically believes that she and her confederates are somehow mainstream.

 

[Stephanie]

This is hilarious.

They attacked. They just didn't come up with a plan to fix the economy that didn't involve deifying the rich and castigating the poor. They didn't read the tea leaves (very ironic, BTW) and see that most Americans don't think that way. That MOST Americans have seen their wealth eroded and have seen that the "job creators" really haven't done that, despite all the tax breaks known to man. They see that all of our middle-class jobs - the good ones you DON'T need life-long debt to be able to get - have been moved off-shore by greedy corporations.

Why is Obamacare even palatable (For the record, I think it fixes nothing)? Clinton tried for health care reform, and was shot down. Know the REAL reason? Because most people were working, most companies were fat enough to give out good health insurance packages, and most people were already covered. So they didn't CARE. Now a lot of them aren't.

The GOP completely misread the feelings of most Americans. Not only did they lose the Presidency, they also lost the Senate. Because, like the Democrats in the late 60's - early 70's, they aren't seeing the change. The presidency became the stronghold of the GOP from 1968-1988. And Clinton was a DINO (Democrat In Name Only). So you can say a rather conservative approach ruled the office for 40 years.

Things have changed. Middle-class people have been screwed (or they THINK they have) and are fighting back. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. They will NOT support any platform that favors the wealthy. THEY want help. They DON'T want radical rhetoric. They want a solution. If the GOP was smart, they could tie into what will become a growing desire of reasonable accommidation. They don't get that by nominating a rich guy who's STUPID enough to say, in PUBLIC, that half of America are freeloaders. And they certainly don't get it by having their Speaker cuss out the Senate Majority leader, like him or NOT.

Romney should have won hands down. A President losing an unpopular war running a struggling economy. Handed to them on a platter. But much like the Democrats in 1972, they nominated someone too far away from what most Americans were worried about.

They blew it.

Wait until 2016. You will see a MUCH different approach from the Grand Old Party. They will toss out the Tea Baggers and the radicals. They will be much more accommidating. Guys like Todd Akin don't have a future.

Omg, a long winded blowhard know it all..shakes the magic 8 ball and gets this^^
yawn yawn yawn

Oh my heavens, a long winded hard head loud mouth from the ultra right pretend conservative wing who magically believes that she and her confederates are somehow mainstream.

Did you invite your cousin over Jakie? he sounds a hell of a lot like you..

 

[JKVegas]

I've tried to explain it. If they don't want to listen, fine. Maybe they'll get it someday, like the Hippies finally did. Radicalism grows tired fast. Especially when it contradicts itself. It raises its head during crisis, like the Tea Baggers did, because a financial commentator (I wonder how much money he actually makes/made in the bond market) had a platform and grabbed a tea bag, in some sort of strange reference to our founding fathers.

I'll give you another example of a change that HASN'T happened yet, but will. When the next gun massacre happens (and it WILL), as the mid-terms arrive, any candidate embracing guns will be trounced.

They can ignore it all they like. It simply will weaken their position.

The change has been coming for quite some time. Most Americans don't believe in the good ol' USA system any longer. Because, in their minds, they've been screwed. The economic growth of both the Clinton and GWB years was all fake - fueled by extending outrageous amounts of credit to people who had no business getting it. But it had to happen - because real wage growth had stagnated. It was the only way to keep the economy going. The banks tried chicanery to cover their bets, and lost. But whom did they run to when confronted by their error? The government they allegedly despise.

"You gotta help us - we're too BIG to fail!"

So the megacorps (and by proxy, the megarich) get bailed out. America asks, "Um, where's MY bail-out?"

I have friends who lost their small business because of the downturn. That's what THEY were asking.

 

[WillowTree]

chris christie needs to double down on another ten cheeseburgers.