China, Serbia mark anniversary of 1999 U.S. bombing of Chinese Embassy

Tom Paine 1949

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2020
5,407
4,512
1,938
Diplomats from the Chinese Embassy in Serbia and Serbian government officials held a commemorative event in Belgrade, the capital of Serbia, today — the 23rd anniversary of the 1999 NATO bombing of the Chinese Embassy to the former Yugoslavia. Though the U.S. maintains this (one and only CIA-organized) bombing was “an accident,” I believe it was intentional and launched by the CIA to warn China not to interfere with NATO operations. I also suspect the Chinese were providing Serbian forces access to Chinese embassy satellite communications.

The 78-day U.S. / NATO bombing campaign in Yugoslavia flew over 38,000 combat missions, killing at least 1500 people. It took the lives of over 500 innocent refugees and civilians and three Chinese journalists, while destroying the bridges and civilian infrastructure of Belgrade. Subsequent NATO operations in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan make it clear this organization is NOT merely “defensive” as the West likes to claim.

Here are two relevant articles: The first is the famous original British Guardian report arguing the attack against the Chinese Embassy in Serbia was intentional; the second reprints a new South China Morning Post article showing the connection “official China” still makes between these earlier NATO attacks and the present bloody war in Ukraine, launched by V. Putin.

One needn’t agree with everything in these articles to grasp why China’s elites and society are both highly suspicious of NATO and especially of U.S. “forward positioning” of military bases and weapons in its immediate region.


 
Originally posted by Tom Paine
Subsequent NATO operations in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan make it clear this organization is NOT merely “defensive” as the West likes to claim.

"Defensive" military alliances are a big joke.

Military alliances do whatever their leaders tell them to do regardless of how they are labelled. Soldiers and military equipment that belong to them don't have anything similar to Asimov's Laws preventing them to be used in wars of aggression.

Of course all countries like to call their military alliances "defensive"... For the last 3 decades we had one of them surrounding a big eurasian country all the while claiming to be merely extending a "security umbrella" to the neighboring countries.

The Warsaw Pact was infinitely more "defensive" than NATO... but only because it "defended" the communist governments from their own people. :biggrin:
 
Everybody loved Clinton's war. He was killing Yugoslavian civilians while the 9-11 terrorists were in flight school in Florida.
 

Forum List

Back
Top