Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 79,650
- 58,618
- 3,565
A word to the wiseProvide evidence that these reporters are in the take.
Be careful what you wish for
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A word to the wiseProvide evidence that these reporters are in the take.
Who gives a fuck?!?!?! Let China do whatever they want. We need to return to Isolationism. Out only contact with foreigners needs to be at the business end of the ICBMs we need to have pointed at every major population center around the world.China loves the Trump supporter.
China is making moves around the world right now as USAID folds. You can be in denial but it is a fact.
Sure.Provide evidence that these reporters are in the take. You’re the one making the outlandish allegation.
You wrote that you wondered how much “loot” the Hill and the New Republic were paid to publish the article cited in the OP.
Your post shows nothing that disproves the OP. It is all in your mind.Sure.
View attachment 1076452
View attachment 1076454
I just googled "Emily Suh USAID." Don't be so gullible, McFly!
What is pathetic is that you bought into Trump’s BS that USAID provides no benefits to the US and that it is just a bastion of corruption. It is one thing to cut out the fat, it is another to gut the entire agency. Something a Trumptard would not understand.What a pathetic hill for progtards to die on.
Trump has expertly backed them into a corner of defending the status quo of large government waste and fraud.
You asked for proof that the author was connected to USAID.Your post shows nothing that disproves the OP. It is all in your mind.
True.This is not just a foreign policy concern — it has direct consequences for U.S. national security.
What I said stands. The Hill piece mentions she was an intern at USAID. That does not mean she was paid by USAID to write the piece.You asked for proof that the author was connected to USAID.
If you keep blindly posting these bought-out pseudo-journalists, you're going to keep being embarassed like this.
Where are your examples of these 'moves' that China is making around the world to fill the vacuum left by USAID not promoting transgenderim around he world anymore.
I didn't even know China was that interested in transgenderism.
You're making the claim.What I said stands. The Hill piece mentions she was an intern at USAID. That does not mean she was paid by USAID to write the piece.
What you need to do is prove her wrong.
Lie.
Stop being an enabler of Chinese hegemony, Frank.
No...The burden of refutation remains on you, Gomer.You wrote that you wondered how much “loot” the Hill and the New Republic were paid to publish the article cited in the OP.
Post a link that gives me the exact amount the Hill and the New Republic were paid by USAID to publish the articles in the OP.
Read this. it may help you understand how China is capitalizing on Trump’s actions.You're making the claim.
Where are all these moves that China is making?
Were you just making that up?
His post shows it is an opinion piece, low on fact, written by a college student, likely of limited knowledge, experience, and probably full of the Leftist indoctrination common to most USA colleges and instructors.Your post shows nothing that disproves the OP. It is all in your mind.
All I read was blah, blah blah.What is pathetic is that you bought into Trump’s BS that USAID provides no benefits to the US and that it is just a bastion of corruption. It is one thing to cut out the fat, it is another to gut the entire agency. Something a Trumptard would not understand.