- Banned
- #41
next up, speeding is a life sentence because, you know, thats actually a danger to someone's life.....right? RIGHT?
LUNACY
LUNACY
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When they started to grab the hat, others could try to intervene with the young boy in the middle of the fight. That was putting the child in danger.To me the charge of endangering the welfare of a child is the most serious offense.
Right there should be a couple of years
How was the child endangered?
I am hoping they have to pay for their own attorney and the parents would sue the women.15 years for this?
ABSURD
BEYOND STUPID
Make them pick up trash along a highway for 500 hours and move on.....jesus christ
When they started to grab the hat, others could try to intervene with the young boy in the middle of the fight. That was putting the child in danger.To me the charge of endangering the welfare of a child is the most serious offense.
Right there should be a couple of years
How was the child endangered?
They were angry and it was an incendiary moment. Seems to me could have easily been in a fight with a Trump supporter.When they started to grab the hat, others could try to intervene with the young boy in the middle of the fight. That was putting the child in danger.To me the charge of endangering the welfare of a child is the most serious offense.
Right there should be a couple of years
How was the child endangered?
"Could"?
Insufficient for charges. WHen was the child in danger? That's what the charges are...
They were angry and it was an incendiary moment. Seems to me could have easily been in a fight with a Trump supporter.When they started to grab the hat, others could try to intervene with the young boy in the middle of the fight. That was putting the child in danger.To me the charge of endangering the welfare of a child is the most serious offense.
Right there should be a couple of years
How was the child endangered?
"Could"?
Insufficient for charges. When was the child in danger? That's what the charges are...
They punched the father, whacked the mother with the cardboard sign, and hit the back of the kids head...there is something very wrong with these two---especially the blonde one. Awful pointless attack.........Might want to read up on this and watch the video. They attacked and adult.I don't see stealing a hat as a "felony hate crime". I don't think any reasonable person would. That it should carry the same characterization as, say, a Jewish kid getting the shit kicked out of him by some neo-nazi fucks is silly to me.
It's a hat.
Endangering the welfare of a child? Again, it's a hat. They took it, and they had no right to, but I don't see how taking his hat endangers him.
Offensive touching? I believe the spirit of this, when originally envisioned, had to do with inappropriate touching of a sexual nature. I don't believe there's any evidence of any such thing here.
Third degree assault? I believe there's a required element of intent, and I don't think either of these women actually wanted to hurt this kid.
Now, none of this should be construed as me believing they should walk. I don't. I think they should be punished, and I certainly wouldn't mind seeing them spend 90 days in the joint. But these charges, in my opinion, represent a classic example of over-charging an offense. If these charges are pursued as written, I think the two skanks walk.
And that would be wrong...
Delaware police arrest 2 after video appears to show MAGA hat snatched from child
Two women have been arrested in Delaware in connection with a viral video that allegedly showed the suspects ripping up Trump signs and stealing a MAGA hat near the site of Democrat Joe Biden's acceptance speech Thursday.www.foxnews.com
They were angry and it was an incendiary moment. Seems to me could have easily been in a fight with a Trump supporter.When they started to grab the hat, others could try to intervene with the young boy in the middle of the fight. That was putting the child in danger.To me the charge of endangering the welfare of a child is the most serious offense.
Right there should be a couple of years
How was the child endangered?
"Could"?
Insufficient for charges. When was the child in danger? That's what the charges are...
Watching the video, at no time did the two women who took the hat place the kid in danger. The kid approached one of the women, and she walked away.
This is classic over-charging, and that's why she won't be found guilty of it...