Chick-fil-A restaurant in CA will pay employees $17 an hour

Well now, I'm glad you asked. Chick Fil A charges higher prices than other fast food chains do. They can do that because they provide a higher quality product and eating experience. Thus, they are more profitable. I mean, how did you not know this?
The chick Fil A in my area is cheaper than a visit to other fast food places for me. Sometimes traffic will be wrapped around the restaurant going through the drive through; however, the wait time is still less than waiting in a shorter line at other fast food places. Bottom line, they have polite employees that provide quick and efficient service. The product is higher quality than most other fast food restaurants at the best price. They are the best in fast food.

I like Cane's, and they don't discriminate.

Neither does Chik Fil a.

Can Gay people become operators? No
Can non-Christian people become operators? No
:linky:

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
 
The chick Fil A in my area is cheaper than a visit to other fast food places for me. Sometimes traffic will be wrapped around the restaurant going through the drive through; however, the wait time is still less than waiting in a shorter line at other fast food places. Bottom line, they have polite employees that provide quick and efficient service. The product is higher quality than most other fast food restaurants at the best price. They are the best in fast food.

I like Cane's, and they don't discriminate.

Neither does Chik Fil a.

Can Gay people become operators? No
Can non-Christian people become operators? No
:linky:

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.
 
When they have conditions matching those this owner found himself in and he proves he can maintain profitability paying those wages.

I thought you claimed to have a great deal of business knowledge. You're not doing a great deal to prove that true.

A Chick-fil-A operator IS NOT an owner. Chick owns ALL of their restaurants.

Is corporate setting these wages, ie are all franchises paying them, or is this one owner doing it on his own?

A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?
 
Without employees, a business wouldn't have a bottom line.

And having too many employees, or paying them more than they contribute, causes the same situation.

Employees make ALL OF THE MONEY for the employer.
So what?

Employees contribute ALL OF THE MONEY.
Only if you ignore all the capital invested.
Yeah, without employees a company makes no money, so what?

And you have to ignore the risk the owner takes.

It also doesn't make any money without management.
 
I like Cane's, and they don't discriminate.

Neither does Chik Fil a.

Can Gay people become operators? No
Can non-Christian people become operators? No
:linky:

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.

If you have a published report the states other than what the video States I'd love to see it.

Why would you give somebody 10 grand for a job?
 
It's NOT the company, the company sucks, it's a franchisee. Now we know that fast food can pay a living wage.

Too bad "Jesus Free" StarBucks won't be profitable enough to pay a living wage. They're turning their places into homeless hangouts and get high stations.

And btw...it IS the company. They don't hand out franchises to just anyone. Fortunately they're not required to give franchises to Satanists or the mentally ill. That means not a single Trump hating, anti-American Leftist at this forum will ever own a Chick-Fil-A.

I think I'll have lunch there tomorrow.

WOOT !!!
 
A Chick-fil-A operator IS NOT an owner. Chick owns ALL of their restaurants.

Is corporate setting these wages, ie are all franchises paying them, or is this one owner doing it on his own?

A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
 
Is corporate setting these wages, ie are all franchises paying them, or is this one owner doing it on his own?

A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
What percentage of your revenue is spent on employee salaries and benefits?
 
Neither does Chik Fil a.

Can Gay people become operators? No
Can non-Christian people become operators? No
:linky:

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.

If you have a published report the states other than what the video States I'd love to see it.

Why would you give somebody 10 grand for a job?
Why would you pay 100 grand for a 4 year degree?
 
And having too many employees, or paying them more than they contribute, causes the same situation.

Employees make ALL OF THE MONEY for the employer.
So what?

Employees contribute ALL OF THE MONEY.
Only if you ignore all the capital invested.
Yeah, without employees a company makes no money, so what?

And you have to ignore the risk the owner takes.

It also doesn't make any money without management.
And having too many employees, or paying them more than they contribute, causes the same situation.

Employees make ALL OF THE MONEY for the employer.
So what?

Employees contribute ALL OF THE MONEY.
Only if you ignore all the capital invested.
Yeah, without employees a company makes no money, so what?

And you have to ignore the risk the owner takes.

It also doesn't make any money without management.

If you do it correctly you'll minimize any risk that you would ever incur.

Or you can hire the correct people and pay them well and you don't need management.
 
It's NOT the company, the company sucks, it's a franchisee. Now we know that fast food can pay a living wage.

Too bad "Jesus Free" StarBucks won't be profitable enough to pay a living wage. They're turning their places into homeless hangouts and get high stations.

And btw...it IS the company. They don't hand out franchises to just anyone. Fortunately they're not required to give franchises to Satanists or the mentally ill. That means not a single Trump hating, anti-American Leftist at this forum will ever own a Chick-Fil-A.

I think I'll have lunch there tomorrow.

WOOT !!!
A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
What percentage of your revenue is spent on employee salaries and benefits?

58%
 
Is corporate setting these wages, ie are all franchises paying them, or is this one owner doing it on his own?

A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.

How many fast food restaurants?

You asked how the owner could pay his employees. You answered yourself.
 
Employees make ALL OF THE MONEY for the employer.
So what?

Employees contribute ALL OF THE MONEY.
Only if you ignore all the capital invested.
Yeah, without employees a company makes no money, so what?

And you have to ignore the risk the owner takes.

It also doesn't make any money without management.
Employees make ALL OF THE MONEY for the employer.
So what?

Employees contribute ALL OF THE MONEY.
Only if you ignore all the capital invested.
Yeah, without employees a company makes no money, so what?

And you have to ignore the risk the owner takes.

It also doesn't make any money without management.

If you do it correctly you'll minimize any risk that you would ever incur.

Or you can hire the correct people and pay them well and you don't need management.

Wrong. The owner always incurs risk. And who do you think does the hiring and paying? Management does. Go into any successful business and you will find management.
 
Can Gay people become operators? No
Can non-Christian people become operators? No
:linky:

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.

If you have a published report the states other than what the video States I'd love to see it.

Why would you give somebody 10 grand for a job?
Why would you pay 100 grand for a 4 year degree?

That's fairly standard at a state college. Now you can take steps to reduce that cost, but tuition plus room and board runs about that much.
 

Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.

If you have a published report the states other than what the video States I'd love to see it.

Why would you give somebody 10 grand for a job?
Why would you pay 100 grand for a 4 year degree?

That's fairly standard at a state college. Now you can take steps to reduce that cost, but tuition plus room and board runs about that much.
I was just making the point that investing 10K (or even 20K) to be an operator of a chick fil a making 200K + per year is not a bad deal.
 
Post #214, in easy to understand video format.
That was 9 and 1/2 minutes of my life I will never get back. That video does not prove that non-christens or gays cannot be operators. That being said, It is understandable why Christians would more likely want to be operators for Chick-Fil-A.

Also, $10,000 is a good deal for "purchasing" a $200,000 + salary/year considering how much some people spend on college degrees to earn less.

If you have a published report the states other than what the video States I'd love to see it.

Why would you give somebody 10 grand for a job?
Why would you pay 100 grand for a 4 year degree?

That's fairly standard at a state college. Now you can take steps to reduce that cost, but tuition plus room and board runs about that much.
I was just making the point that investing 10K (or even 20K) to be an operator of a chick fil a making 200K + per year is not a bad deal.

That is true. I read your post incorrectly.
 
Is corporate setting these wages, ie are all franchises paying them, or is this one owner doing it on his own?

A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
ONEPERCENTER is a message board billionaire.
:bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3:
 
It's NOT the company, the company sucks, it's a franchisee. Now we know that fast food can pay a living wage.

Too bad "Jesus Free" StarBucks won't be profitable enough to pay a living wage. They're turning their places into homeless hangouts and get high stations.

And btw...it IS the company. They don't hand out franchises to just anyone. Fortunately they're not required to give franchises to Satanists or the mentally ill. That means not a single Trump hating, anti-American Leftist at this forum will ever own a Chick-Fil-A.

I think I'll have lunch there tomorrow.

WOOT !!!
That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
What percentage of your revenue is spent on employee salaries and benefits?

58%
Why not 100%? Your employees make you all your money.
 
A typical operator of a Chick nets $130k+/-/yr. How would an operator pay his/her employees?

That doesn't address the question.

1. Does the operator set the wages at his store or does corporate set them?

2. Net is not gross. There's a difference, and one would expect a business owner to know that. Nice though, that you acknowledge an owner isn't getting rich off his franchise. Kind of blows your whole argument that fast food is making huge profits out of the water.

1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
ONEPERCENTER is a message board billionaire.
:bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3::bow2::bow3:
I think he's Warren Buffett.
 
It's NOT the company, the company sucks, it's a franchisee. Now we know that fast food can pay a living wage.

Too bad "Jesus Free" StarBucks won't be profitable enough to pay a living wage. They're turning their places into homeless hangouts and get high stations.

And btw...it IS the company. They don't hand out franchises to just anyone. Fortunately they're not required to give franchises to Satanists or the mentally ill. That means not a single Trump hating, anti-American Leftist at this forum will ever own a Chick-Fil-A.

I think I'll have lunch there tomorrow.

WOOT !!!
1. In this instance it appears the operator set the wages, but more importantly, corporate pays the bill.

2. Revenue is the total amount of monies a business brings due to sales. A Chick operator is NOT an owner. Chick makes HUGE profits.
So the store doesn't generate enough to pay employees, but all the stores generate enough to pay all the employees.

IOW, this one owner is going to try paying more, and from that you extrapolate that all of fast food can afford to do it. Do you realize how ridiculous that is?

Answer this. If you're a business owner, and fast food is so profitable, why don't you own a bunch of stores?

How do you know that the store doesn't generate enough Revenue to pay its employees?

I currently own five businesses that provide service and product to the government and corporations, it's recession-proof.

I've Angel invested numerous restaurants, so I know what the profit margin is and I know the profit potential.
What percentage of your revenue is spent on employee salaries and benefits?

58%
Why not 100%? Your employees make you all your money.

Obviously, he's selfish and greedy. The company doesn't need him, so he should simply give it to the employees and leave.
 

Forum List

Back
Top