chauvin juror could cause appeal

[StormAl]

No and No to the questions above.

Chauvin exceeded legitimate and lawful force.

Everyone knows that.

 

[Meathead]

Derek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say

A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.

minnesota.cbslocal.com

man looks like appeal time.

He was obviously going to win on appeal and the state under Keith Ellison will of course call a retrial, so not much has changed.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

There is too much evidence coming out about the fake trial. There will be a retrial.

 

[The Purge]

Looks like we might get another chance to watch the Democrat Utopias Burn to the Ground!!

 

[TheParser]

1. There will be NO retrial.

2. BLM has no doubt notified the Administration that it will not tolerate a retrial. And when BLM speaks, all liberals jump to attention.

3. Besides, a retrial would result in the same decision, for the jury will again be "diverse," thus assuring a "guilty" on every charge.

4. With the COVID tragedy & the 2020 election already dividing our nation, the powers-that-be simply will not allow a retrial, which would result in unprecedented violence. After all, Nancy has already proclaimed Mr. Floyd to be our greatest martyr.

 

[StormAl]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Khmer Noir.

 

[Weatherman2020]

1. There will be NO retrial.

2. BLM has no doubt notified the Administration that it will not tolerate a retrial. And when BLM speaks, all liberals jump to attention.

3. Besides, a retrial would result in the same decision, for the jury will again be "diverse," thus assuring a "guilty" on every charge.

4. With the COVID tragedy & the 2020 election already dividing our nation, the powers-that-be simply will not allow a retrial, which would result in unprecedented violence. After all, Nancy has already proclaimed Mr. Floyd to be our greatest martyr.

Thanks to Waters telling the Jury they’ll burn, loot and murder unless they say guilty along with this juror who lied, you better hope there’s a retrial. One day soon the roles will be reversed in the courtroom.

 

[WEATHER53]

He lied and did so because he had a conviction agenda. It sounds like all the jurors but one were on board due to fears and the one dissenter just happened to live the furthest from town.

 

[Vel]

Well here we go. Derek Chauvin's attorney requests new trial, says verdict "contrary to law"

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Derek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say

A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.

minnesota.cbslocal.com

man looks like appeal time.

They're going to appeal regardless of this

 

[struth]

Derek Chauvin Juror Brandon Mitchell's Participation In D.C. March Could Help Appeal, Legal Experts Say

A picture of a juror in the Derek Chauvin trial posted on social media has some legal experts saying it could help in an appeal.

minnesota.cbslocal.com

man looks like appeal time.

wow...sounds like the libs are doing all they can to ensure that this guy gets off

putting a brownshirt blm insurrestionist on the jury is gonna backfire

 

[struth]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

 

[StormAl]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

 

[struth]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

 

[StormAl]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.

 

[struth]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.

there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.

what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??

 

[StormAl]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.

there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.

what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??

There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.

 

[struth]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.

there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.

what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??

There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.

haha sure there. the law doesn’t allow the govt to go back and bring more charges if they get a verdict over turned on a appeal.

They can only proceed on the charges that they got convictions on in the first case A retrial is ordered...not a re indictment

 

[StormAl]

A retrial may occur, and Chauvin will be convicted on all the old charges and all of the new added ones.

they can’t bring new ones related to this event.

The DAs will try.

to violate the law? wow...

It's not a violation of the Judge buys their legal argument.

there is no legal legal argument to violate double jeapardy that way.

what other charges would they bring and why didn’t they bring them already anyway??

There is no double jeopardy if the verdict is thrown out and a retrial ordered.

haha sure there. the law doesn’t allow the govt to go back and bring more charges if they get a verdict over turned on a appeal.

They can only proceed on the charges that they got convictions on in the first case A retrial is ordered...not a re indictment

study up, please, and re-read above