Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The next sentence of your copy/paste source:Wrong.
"If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it, and if I could save it by freeing all the slaves I would do it; and if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone I would also do that."
- Abraham Lincoln -
It was about states' right's.Absolutely. Yes the war was 100% about slavery. And treason. And the only way the traitor slavers could be stopped was to murder them and murder them and murder them some more, until the rest of the traitor slavers calculated that they were more likely to get the murder they deserved than to win the war.
It was about states' right's.
The war didn't start until Lincoln invaded.And they seceded because of slavery. Lincoln was commenting on saving the Union. Which was broken because of slavery.
I read perfectly well.You don’t read well, do you?
To preserve the Union, as the traitor slaver white supremacists had seceded because they were worried they could no longer own brown people forever.The war didn't start until Lincoln invaded.
He had no authority to "preserve the union," jackass. If the union wanted to split apart, that's there business.To preserve the Union, as the traitor slaver white supremacists had seceded because they were worried they could no longer own brown people forever.
Yet he did it anyway, using the United States Army. And they murdered so many slaver traitors that the slaver traitors eventually gave up their slavery and treason.He had no authority to "preserve the union," jackass.
And firing on Ft. Sumpter was just recreational fireworks?"The war didn't start until Lincoln invaded."
"He had no authority to "preserve the union," jackass. If the union wanted to split apart, that's there business."
Wrong.
Your Great, Great, Great Grandfather fought in a militia whose state was in treasonous, lawless rebellion.
Wrong.
Your Great, Great, Great Grandfather fought in a militia whose state was in treasonous, lawless rebellion.
Well first, it's "Secession".Succession wasn't illegal until 1869, dumbass
You're a fcking idiot
Well first, it's "Secession".
Second... So what? Gonna travel back in time and write the United States Army a ticket, officer? I suppose you could take it to them now.
Well first, it's "Secession".
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Get lost Ft Fuckup.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Memo to: Fort Fun Indiana:
From: New to Here Poster
Trump-fraus just hate it when their educational level is question or exposed.
It's an over-compensation-thingy with them. Quite understandable.
As such, we can be patient with them.
To be sure, their missteps do need to be pointed out, just so they can strive to improve; however, perhaps more subtly one could just insert an abbreviated sic erat scriptum in brackets (sic) after one of their frequent faux pas. With that they may feel they are being 'guided' to better language usage.....rather than 'corrected'.
In my humble opinion.
"Who are you..."
I get why you refuse to believe racism still permeates our country. You can't fix it if you can't diagnose it. You don't want to fix it.
Thank goodness that statue and the one of stonewall jackson are coming down.
Chillicothe is someone who doesn't respect history.Who are you, Chinchilla?
I've backed it all up. You have been provided proof of institutionalized racism, proof of the Southern Strategy and proof that you aren't more intelligent than black people, but you just say "nuh uh" and demand more proof.You keep saying shit like that, when you can't back up ANY of it.
To date, your primary supporting "evidence" for the Southern Strategy, a supposedly huge strategy that flipped a third of the country politically,
was Nixon eliminating a republican sub-committee and some guy assumed it was because of the Southern Strategy.
That was your star piece of "evidence".
You are the one that wants to keeep wacism alive, because as long as you have it to rile up people, especially minority voters, you can win elections.
That doing that is insanely divisive, to the point that people are literally dying in the streets, is a price you are happy to pay.
