Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University

[M14 Shooter]

They've been driven into this blind rage by the voices they trust -- including Kirk.
This was decades in the making, beginning with the day Limbaugh went national.

All of which, you believe, makes it perfectly OK to kill people you do not agree with.

 

[HikerGuy83]

They just operate as programmed. They don't have any critical thinking skills.

What an amazing statement given that you started this thread and yet you have five or six pieces of human garbage attempting to derail it.

What critical thinking have you seen from them. I'd love to have an example.

Dante shows up purposely playing on people's anger and taunting them every step of the way.

citygator says the thread is about "political killings". I don't see that in your title or in your OP. Oh, and his argument or deflection is about children being killed in schools. I had no idea children were killed in schools over politics.

Please show me where they (or YOU for that matter) have shown any critical thinking skills.

 

[Delldude]

Symbols/slogans were carved on all casings in the weapon 30-06 Transgender, anti- facist words. Deep State sent out their fitlth to act?

He used a 98 Mauser. Nazi WW2 rifle, tran and antifa crap on the shells.

Roadmap being left?

For what?

 

[pknopp]

He DID have major character flaws, but if a white person were to criticize any aspect of him, blacks would scream “raaaaacist!”

Just like MAGA does when pointing out Trump's.

 

[jc456]

Don't respond to the idiot.

He's trying to derail the thread in an effort to vent over the fact that people don't behave like he thinks they should. I've reported his posts.

This thread is about Charlie Kirk. Not about citygator's butthurt over our lack of devotion to his priorities.

yep, I told him already.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

In a recent TV chat with Megyn Kelly (sea above) he mentioned he was vilified in the Israeli press, well I found that article, here it is, from Aug 5th:

The Blogs: Dear Charlie Kirk, the Noise Got to You, Too

From the blog of Daniella Bloom at The Times of Israel

blogs.timesofisrael.com

 

[leftwinger]

No one is celebrating this moron

 

[Lisa558]

Just like MAGA does when pointing out Trump's.

MAGA yells racist?

 

[Lisa558]

In a recent TV chat with Megyn Kelly (sea above) he mentioned he was vilified in the Israeli press, well I found that article, here it is, from Aug 5th:

The Blogs: Dear Charlie Kirk, the Noise Got to You, Too

From the blog of Daniella Bloom at The Times of Israel

blogs.timesofisrael.com

^^^ this guy is sticking with “it’s the Jews’ fault.”

 

[HikerGuy83]

They've been driven into this blind rage by the voices they trust -- including Kirk.

Your choice of words is fantastic.

Saul Alinsky would give you a medal.

Your attempts at derailing the thread along with the other human garbage that stand at your side have been partially successful.

Now, you even have the OP (who is also a moderator and should know better) making stupid statements.

But, in the end, it won't wash.

Charlie Kirk was a very good man. A man who was trying to do something. And your kind of speech is what got him silenced. As I said before, you are part of the problem.

 

[jc456]

This thread is about Charlie Kirk being shot at an event where he was practicing what he preached....keeping dialogue open to avoid violence.

You need to make it about political killings because you don't see the sackcloth and ashes you think needs to happen over school shootings. Stop making stuff up.


Since when do you listen to anything or anyone except when it is convenient for you. You've also been told a lot of other things which you don't seem to listen to.


Yeah.....terrible statistic. It involved 444 people over 10 years. Sorry....can't really get to excited about that. And if I lived in parts of Chicago, I'd be ROTFLMAO.

But you keep pushing it. I realize it's about all you have.

Charlie Kirk, a man who attempted to keep the dialogue going (via open debate) was killed. He was the leader of a large organization and was very charismatic.

So people are upset. And apparently that upsets you.

Get over it.

Charlie was about conversation over violence, it's why he did what he did while knowing the risk. The demofks in here saw that as insulting. hahahahahahahahahaha, they couldn't debate a rock.

 

[The Duke]

They've been driven into this blind rage by the voices they trust -- including Kirk.

This was decades in the making, beginning with the day Limbaugh went national.

Oh yeah, it's been building up to this and he deserved it, huh, Mac1958 ?
He brought this on himself, huh? Is that the position you're taking?

 

[jc456]

^^^ this guy is sticking with “it’s the Jews’ fault.”

who cares. He's meaningless, and that's all the facts anyone needs.

 

[Lesh]

Sure. Like Trump saw people cheering 9/11

 

[Rawley]

They've been driven into this blind rage by the voices they trust -- including Kirk.

You clearly never listened to the man, so you should probably STFU.

 

[airplanemechanic]

He used a 98 Mauser. Nazi WW2 rifle, tran and antifa crap on the shells.

Roadmap being left?

For what?

Where did you see that?

 

[odanny]

He may have been starting to get a bit too loose with his words for some...

View attachment 1160723



Aside...

During a July 2025 episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show," Charlie Kirk and his guest, Tucker Carlson, engaged in a detailed discussion centered on the late financier Jeffrey Epstein and his alleged connections to Israeli intelligence. The conversation represented a notable instance of questioning the actions of a key U.S. ally on a prominent conservative platform.

The core of the discussion revolved around the theory that Epstein's sex trafficking and blackmail operations may have been conducted on behalf of a foreign intelligence agency, with Carlson specifically pointing to the possibility of Israeli involvement. Carlson articulated that it was "extremely obvious" that Epstein had "direct connections to a foreign government," and he argued that the reluctance in media and political circles to name Israel in this context was due to a climate of fear and censorship.

Both Kirk and Carlson were careful to frame their conversation as a matter of national interest and transparency, rather than an attack on Israel itself. They emphasized that asking critical questions about the potential influence of any foreign government on American soil should not be considered "hateful," "anti-Semitic," or "anti-Israel." Instead, they presented it as a fundamental right of citizens to hold their own government and foreign powers accountable.


Key points raised during their appearance included:

* Allegations of a Blackmail Scheme: Carlson put forward the idea that Epstein's activities were not merely the actions of an individual but were potentially part of a sophisticated blackmail operation designed to compromise influential American officials for the benefit of Israeli intelligence.

* Questioning Foreign Influence: Kirk echoed Carlson's concerns, stressing the need for open dialogue about the extent of foreign influence in American politics and affairs.

* The "Off-Limits" Nature of the Topic: A significant portion of the conversation was dedicated to the idea that it has become taboo to question the U.S.-Israel relationship or to suggest that Israeli intelligence could be involved in illicit activities on American soil. They argued that this unwillingness to engage in critical inquiry creates resentment and allows potentially harmful activities to go unexamined.

* High-Profile Connections: Carlson pointed to the known association between Epstein and former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak as a significant piece of circumstantial evidence that warranted further investigation.

In summary, the content of Charlie Kirk's and Tucker Carlson's discussion regarding Israel was not a broad critique of the nation's existence or general policies. Instead, it was a focused and pointed inquiry into the specific and serious allegations of Israeli intelligence potentially using Jeffrey Epstein as an asset to conduct a blackmail operation within the United States. They positioned their discussion as a necessary, albeit controversial, examination of national security and foreign influence.


4:45 PM · Sep 10, 2025
·
12K
Views





Relevant reading...

Why Charlie Kirk remains a key advocate for Israel amid criticism | The Jerusalem Post

Charlie Kirk is not the enemy. He is one of the few voices with the reach, credibility, and courage to make the case for Israel in a skeptical, cynical, and disillusioned generation.

www.jpost.com

''There’s a growing firestorm of criticism aimed at Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA following Tucker Carlson’s controversial remarks at the organization’s recent Student Action Summit (SAS).
So, why the outrage?

It stems from a misunderstanding – especially among older, more traditional segments of the pro-Israel community – about what it takes to reach young people today. The MAGA coalition is broad, fragile, and filled with ideological crosscurrents. It is true, no doubt, that some genuine antisemites are trying to hijack the narrative. But few are fighting harder to stop them than Charlie Kirk."


So I dunno.

Queue Ben Shapiro to carry out the role for a more filtered, more controlled perspective aimed at the youth? Maybe that...


Interesting anomaly, if true...

Post in thread 'Charlie Kirk Shot and Killed at Utah Valley University'

Sep 11, 2025

BREAKING

Private plane left airport five miles from shooting, one hour after shooting. Plane turned off radar, which is illegal.

Plane then returned....

Plane registration:

N888KG (2013 BOMBARDIER INC BD-100-1A10 owned by N888KG LLC) Aircraft Registration - FlightAware

N888KG (2013 BOMBARDIER INC BD-100-1A10 owned by N888KG LLC) aircraft registration information with aircraft photos, flight tracking, and maps.

www.flightaware.com

Owner of plane has turned off on-line tracking....

• Jim H - VA USA

• 

And, for good measure?...

Thread 'Assassin’s rifle has been found by ATF'

Sep 11, 2025

Apparently the authorities have located a rifle that was likely used to kill Charlie Kirk.





It also has transgenderism rhetoric on it.


Is anyone going to be surprised if the shooter is another transgender nutjob?

• theHawk
• Replies: 218
• Forum: Current Events

• 
• 
• 

Yes, uncomfortable questions and fair conjecture may certainly sting where emotion and feelings prevail. But that's what serious people do. They ask uncomfortable questions...

It's nice that some people are posting relevant information on this thread, unlike all the serial droolers who have stretched this thread to 146 pages with their entirely predictable Belch/Derp commentary.

BTW, a former Israeli PM was a guest at Epstein's Manhattan apartment.

 

[leftwinger]

Conspiracists are working hard.

You never know. Could be anything. But tranny anti-facist carved on bullets of 30-06 allegedly.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

^^^ this guy is sticking with “it’s the Jews’ fault.”

Read the article, here's what she said, now please tell me, do you agree with the writer, Daniella Bloom, an "ambassador" of JEXIT?

 

[jc456]

They've been driven into this blind rage by the voices they trust -- including Kirk.

This was decades in the making, beginning with the day Limbaugh went national.

ahh the old, if you use free speech, I don't agree with, it needs to be silence klan...