It is well known that dna evidence is not always found after a rape. Lack of dna evidence is not evidence of lack of rape.
REALLY.
So you're saying --- if some woman in Bangladesh is raped --- and your DNA does not show up on her ----- that doesn't mean you didn't do it.
Yeah you go with that one Sparkles.
Correct. DNA is not always recoverable in a rape.
Off the top of my head, at least one of the rapists was convicted based on his confession that he "only held her down".
Then the top of your head is as wrong as the bottom.[/QUOTE]
Central Park jogger case - Wikipedia
"All five
confessed to a number of the attacks committed in the park that night, and implicated one or more of the others.
[9][38] None of the five said they themselves actually raped the jogger, but each confessed to being an accomplice to the rape.
[9] All five said that they themselves had only helped restrain the jogger, or touched her, while one or more others raped her.
[38] Antron McCray said that a "Puerto Rican kid with a hoodie" had been the one who raped the jogger.
[9] While he was incarcerated in the
Rikers Island jail, Korey Wise told the older sister of a friend of his, according to her testimony, that he'd only held the jogger down.
[38]
Yusef Salaam made verbal admissions, but refused to sign a confession or make one on videotape. However, Salaam was implicated by all of the other four, and convicted at trial. Six others were charged with committing crimes in the park that night as well. "
This is where, if you had any intellectual honestly, you would admit that President Trump was right to post his ad, and that the evidence not of "racism" but of moral courage.