CDC Still Ignoring Autopsy Findings by Eminent Pathologists That COVID Vaccines Are the Cause of Most Worldwide Excess Deaths

" Towing The Partisan Line "

* Purple People Eaters *

Democrats = censorship
People who try to silence others are usually in the wrong.
The only thing more anti-American then censorship is Democrats.
I do not know of anyone who died from watching pornography , but i know of several that died from covid vaccines .

So do not forget to include for criticism the censorship by closet faggots that block internet access to adult websites through some bull shit justification that it is a public safety issue .
 
" Towing The Partisan Line "

* Purple People Eaters *


I do not know of anyone who died from watching pornography , but i know of several that died from covid vaccines .

So do not forget to include for criticism the censorship by closet faggots that block internet access to adult websites through some bull shit justification that it is a public safety issue .


Well, since only two of the seventeen states blocking access don't have Republican governors, and fourteen of the seventeen have state legislatures that are majority Republican and the remaining three are split...

One can only conclude that you are referring to Republicans... mostly.
 
"There was never any such thing as a "covid" virus. Your government developed murder shots to kill you.

That is where the money really went - to develop poison shots that would cause a variety of cancers and other deadly conditions like heart attacks, strokes and more.

The sickness was in the shots only."
 
"There was never any such thing as a "covid" virus. Your government developed murder shots to kill you.

That is where the money really went - to develop poison shots that would cause a variety of cancers and other deadly conditions like heart attacks, strokes and more.

The sickness was in the shots only."
Stupid bitch
 
" Conscription Consoling The Foolish "

* Old Folks Got The Sugar *

She is not a bitch, but denying a covid pandemic is rather stupid, yes.
None denies a gain of function pandemic that adversely affected those with diabetes ; while ghoul den rules applied , where ghouls with the gold made the goal den rules .

The national institutes of health outed many liars in 2021 ; ever wonder whether rna viruses are precursors for nematodes ?

gr1.jpg



Two principal themes emerge from these data regarding the severity of COVID-19 in type 1 diabetes. First, after adjustment for age, race, and other risk factors, the odds of a COVID-19–related hospitalization and greater illness severity for patients with type 1 diabetes are three- to fourfold higher than for patients without diabetes. This increased risk is approximately the same for patients with type 2 diabetes (Fig. 1A and C). Second, COVID-19 outcome severity in type 1 diabetes is associated with glycemic, vascular, and socioeconomic risk factors.
 
Last edited:
" Conscription Consoling The Foolish "

* Old Folks Got The Sugar *


None denies a gain of function pandemic that adversely affected those with diabetes ; while ghoul den rules applied , where ghouls with the gold made the goal den rules .

The national institutes of health outed many liars in 2021 ; ever wonder whether rna viruses are precursors for nematodes ?

gr1.jpg



Two principal themes emerge from these data regarding the severity of COVID-19 in type 1 diabetes. First, after adjustment for age, race, and other risk factors, the odds of a COVID-19–related hospitalization and greater illness severity for patients with type 1 diabetes are three- to fourfold higher than for patients without diabetes. This increased risk is approximately the same for patients with type 2 diabetes (Fig. 1A and C). Second, COVID-19 outcome severity in type 1 diabetes is associated with glycemic, vascular, and socioeconomic risk factors.
Do you deny that millions of lives and quality of life have been saved by the vax?

If you do, I advise you for the rest of our sake, please do not get vaxxed or boosted.
 
" Blanket Solution For A Specific Demographic "

* Get Rid Of Your Worms Worm *

Do you deny that millions of lives and quality of life have been saved by the vax?
Do you deny that millions of lives and quality of life were not saved because ivermectin was not accessible to the public ?

The chemotherapy patients whose immune systems were compromised , and could not receive a vaccine , were administered corticosteroids that worked .

The function of neutrophils, macrophage, and monocyte is impaired by corticosteroids.

* Not Interested So Go Fuck Yourself Ass Clown *
If you do, I advise you for the rest of our sake, please do not get vaxxed or boosted.
The last time this moniker received a vaccination was called plague I and plague II , while serving in the military many years ago , when it was required .

And , no , this moniker did not take ivermectin ; in fact , no prophylaxis was taken .

* Upright Pitcher Of Water To Drown Patients With Limited Staff And Ignorant Methods *

Whichever subgenious thought that the complicated management of intubation , in an upright posture to collect expectorant , was better than an iron lung and inclined to apply gravity for expelling expectorant , should rethink their condition .
 
Last edited:
Thanks to admitting millions of lives were saved because of the Covid vax.

Ivermectin is good for horses, but not for humans, no evidence of it at all.

Neither is bleach, UV lights, etc.

Ivermectin has been studied as a potential treatment for COVID-19, but the evidence is mixed. Some studies suggest it might have some benefits, while others do not show significant effects1. The World Health Organization (WHO) and other health authorities generally do not recommend ivermectin for treating COVID-19 due to insufficient evidence of its efficacy and safety.

spondenceThe new england journal o f medicinen engl j med 387;24 nejm.org December 15, 2022 e66(1)Ivermectin Treatment for Covid-19To the Editor: Reis et al. (May 5 issue)1 present the results of the TOGETHER platform trial, a large trial of ivermectin in outpatients with Covid-19. The relative risk of hospitalization or prolonged observation in the emergency department owing to Covid-19 (the primary outcome) in the ivermectin group as compared with the placebo group was 0.90 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.70 to 1.16), and the relative risk of death (a secondary outcome) was 0.88 (95% Bayesian credible interval, 0.49 to 1.55).1 The prespecified threshold for the clinical utility of ivermectin was a 37.5% difference, as compared with placebo, in the relative risk of a primary-outcome event, a threshold that is probably too conservative for a drug such as ivermectin. The relative risk estimates in the trial were compatible with reductions of up to 30% in the risk of hospitalization or prolonged observation and 51% in the risk of death with ivermectin.Given the wide availability and low cost of ivermectin and that the dosage used in the trial appeared to be safe, such treatment effects could be an important benefit for high-risk patients who do not have access to approved Covid-19 vaccines and costly therapies. The results of the TOGETHER trial were eagerly awaited because of their potential to inform the debate over ivermectin as treatment,2 but they were arguably nondefinitive3 regarding the two most relevant outcomes for outpatients with Covid-19.4Leonardo Furlan, Ph.D.University of São Paulo Medical SchoolSão Paulo, Brazilleonardo.furlan@fm.usp.brNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this letter was reported.1. Reis G, Silva EASM, Silva DCM, et al. Effect of early treatment with ivermectin among patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1721-31.2. Furlan L, Caramelli B. The regrettable story of the “Covid Kit” and the “Early Treatment of Covid-19” in Brazil. Lancet Reg Health Am 2021;4:100089.3. Montori VM, Kleinbart J, Newman TB, et al. Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 2. Measures of precision (confidence intervals). CMAJ 2004;171:611-5.4. World Health Organization. Therapeutics and COVID-19: living guideline. July 14, 2022 (https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-therapeutics-2022.4).DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2207995To the Editor: In the article by Reis and associates, we noticed a discrepancy regarding vaccinated participants. In the Methods section of their article, the authors stated that patients who had been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 were eligible for participation. However, the protocol, available with the full text of the article at NEJM.org, listed vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 as the fourth exclusion criterion. Furthermore, the previously published master protocol did not mention vaccination status in the selection process.1We assumed that vaccinated persons were allowed to participate in the trial. However, the authors did not indicate the number of vaccinated patients in each trial group.Public information shows that during the trial period (March 23, 2021, through August 6, 2021), the proportion of persons in the Brazilian population who were fully vaccinated increased from 2.03% to 21.07%.2 Thus, vaccination status could have been a confounder, and this information is needed to properly interpret the results of the trial. In addition, an ad hoc subgroup analysis according to vaccination status would be of interest.Jorge H. Mejía, M.D.Junta Regional de Calificación e Invalidez de Bogotá y CundinamarcaBogota, ColombiaCarlos A. Jimenez, M.D.University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterHouston, TXNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this letter was reported.1. Reis G, Silva EASM, Silva DCM, et al. A multi-center, adaptive, randomized, platform trial to evaluate the effect of repurposed medicines in outpatients with early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and high-risk for complications: the TOGETHER master trial protocol. August 5, 2021 (A multi-center, adaptive, randomized,... | Gates Open Research). preprint.2. Our World in Data. Share of people who completed the initial Covid-19 vaccination protocol (https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/share-people-fully-vaccinated-covid).DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2207995The New England Journal of Medicine is produced by NEJM Group, a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society.Downloaded from nejm.org on February 5, 2025. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.The new england journal o f medicinee66(2) n engl j med 387;24 nejm.org December 15, 2022To the Editor: Reis et al. conclude that ivermectin is ineffective for the treatment of Covid-19. However, they found the treatment to be safe, with no significant differences in the incidence of adverse events between the patients who received ivermectin and those who received placebo. Those results are confusing and must be balanced with real-world data. It is well known that uncontrolled or inappropriate use of ivermectin can lead to severe or fatal adverse drug reactions such as hypotension, ataxia, or seizures.1 Since the first mention of ivermectin as a potential treatment for Covid-19 in May 2020, a surge in adverse drug reactions to ivermectin has been reported to pharmacovigilance centers. Between 2019 and 2020, there was a 166% increase in spontaneous notifications in VigiBase, the pharmacovigilance database of the World Health Organization.2 Between May 1, 2020, and April 1, 2022, a total of 2944 adverse drug reactions associated with ivermectin were reported: 167 (5.7%) were severe, and there were 46 deaths or life-threatening conditions (1.6%) and 67 hospitalizations (2.3%). In addition to being ineffective, the off-label use of ivermectin may be harmful.Romain Barus, Ph.D.Sophie Gautier, Ph.D.Guillaume Wabont, Pharm.D.Lille University HospitalLille, Francewabont.guillaume@gmail.comNo potential conflict of interest relevant to this letter was reported.1. Temple C, Hoang R, Hendrickson RG. Toxic effects from ivermectin use associated with prevention and treatment of Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2021;385:2197-8.2. Lindquist M. VigiBase, the WHO Global ICSR Database System: basic facts. Drug Inf J 2008;42:409-19.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2207995The authors reply: Furlan suggests that a 37.5% difference in the relative risk of a primaryoutcome event was too optimistic. Adaptive trials using interim analyses are not influenced by a priori sample-size estimates. Two new large trials have also shown a lack of treatment benefit of ivermectin.1,2Mejía and Jimenez inquire about vaccination status. It would be unethical to withhold access to vaccines from participants during a pandemic. By the time our trial was completed, 6% of the patients had received at least one dose of vaccine.Barus et al. raise safety concerns. We agree that these concerns should be considered.Gilmar Reis, M.D., Ph.D.Cardresearch–Cardiologia Assistencial e de PesquisaBelo Horizonte, BrazilEdward J. Mills, Ph.D., F.R.C.P.McMaster UniversityHamilton, ON, Canadathetogethertrial@gmail.comSince publication of their article, the authors report no further potential conflict of interest.1. Bramante CT, Huling JD, Tignanelli CJ, et al. Randomized trial of metformin, ivermectin, and fluvoxamine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med 2022;387:599-610.2. Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV)-6 Study Group, Naggie S. Ivermectin for treatment of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting: a decentralized, placebo-controlled, randomized, platform clinical trial. June 12, 2022 (Ivermectin for Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate COVID-19 in the Outpatient Setting: A Decentralized, Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Platform Clinical Trial). preprint.DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2207995Correspondence Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society.The New England Journal of Medicine is produced by NEJM Group, a division of the Massachusetts Medical Society.Downloaded from nejm.org on February 5, 2025. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2022 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved
 
" Blanket Solution For A Specific Demographic "

* Get Rid Of Your Worms Worm *


Do you deny that millions of lives and quality of life were not saved because ivermectin was not accessible to the public ?

The chemotherapy patients whose immune systems were compromised , and could not receive a vaccine , were administered corticosteroids that worked .

The function of neutrophils, macrophage, and monocyte is impaired by corticosteroids.

* Not Interested So Go Fuck Yourself Ass Clown *

The last time this moniker received a vaccination was called plague I and plague II , while serving in the military many years ago , when it was required .

And , no , this moniker did not take ivermectin ; in fact , no prophylaxis was taken .

* Upright Pitcher Of Water To Drown Patients With Limited Staff And Ignorant Methods *

Whichever subgenious thought that the complicated management of intubation , in an upright posture to collect expectorant , was better than an iron lung and inclined to apply gravity for expelling expectorant , should rethink their condition .
Horse paste didn't save dick shit fuckup.
 
" Bury The Obvious By Slandering The Useful "

* Numb Skulls Duped By Bureaucrats Paid To Promote Pharmacies *

Horse paste didn't save dick shit fuckup.
Read the article and graph , or are you so deluded by the bandwagon logical fallacy of group think from partisan hacks as to be incapable of thinking for yourself ?

Ivermectin has been used to treat billions of hue mammon apes .

In 2015, the Nobel Committee for Physiology or Medicine, in its only award for treatments of infectious diseases since six decades prior, honoured the discovery of ivermectin (IVM), a multifaceted drug deployed against some of the world's most devastating tropical diseases. Since March 2020, when IVM was first used against a new global scourge, COVID-19, more than 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have tracked such inpatient and outpatient treatments. Six of seven meta-analyses of IVM treatment RCTs reporting in 2021 found notable reductions in COVID-19 fatalities, with a mean 31% relative risk of mortality vs. controls. During mass IVM treatments in Peru, excess deaths fell by a mean of 74% over 30 days in its ten states with the most extensive treatments. Reductions in deaths correlated with the extent of IVM distributions in all 25 states with p < 0.002.


gr1.jpg
 
Last edited:
Monk-Eye and most of those pro-ivermectin do not understand the graphs. The NEMJ says nothing has shown any positive effect. However, once again, vax or not is your choice.
 
" Big Pharma Goofballs Know How To Play Fools "

* Hind Sight By Others Not Duped By Ghouls With The Gold *

The NEMJ says that it has not been proven that ivermection did anything good for Covid victims.
Monk-Eye and most of those pro-ivermectin do not understand the graphs. The NEMJ says nothing has shown any positive effect. However, once again, vax or not is your choice.
NEMJ are stupid as rocks on the issue , as far as statistics indicate from regions around the world that have proved NEMJ conclusions to be little more than horse flatulence .

10. The safety, availability, and cost of ivermectin are nearly unparalleled given its low incidence of important drug interactions along with only mild and rare side effects observed in almost 40 years of use and billions of doses administered.

Currently, as of December 14, 2020, there is accumulating evidence that demonstrates both the safety and efficacy of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Large-scale epidemiologic analyses validate the findings of in vitro, animal, prophylaxis, and clinical studies. Epidemiologic data from regions of the world with widespread ivermectin use have demonstrated a temporally associated reduction in case counts, hospitalizations, and fatality rates .

Further data supporting a role of ivermectin in decreasing transmission rates can be found from South American countries where, in retrospect, large “natural experiments” seem to have occurred.

Further compounding these alarming developments
was a wave of recently published results from therapeutic randomized controlled trials conducted on medicines believed effective for COVID-19 that found a lack of impact on mortality in hospitalized patients with the use of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibody therapy.14

Paraguay – COVID-19 case counts and deaths in Alto Parana (bolded blue line) after ivermectin distribution began compared to other regions.

ajt-28-e299-g007.jpg



* Facade On Remdesivir *
 
Last edited:
Ignore the work of truly distinguished scientists but broadcast the words of Wizard of Oz Tony Fauci, who doesn't know much more than a high school biology teacher, but is very skilled at lying. That is the strategy. Every American should be sending this to all major media to answer these findings. Of all the suppressed knowledge we now have of the vaccines, this is the most suppressed.



That the COVID vaccines contributed significantly to the current wave of excess deaths in the US and in countries around the world is no longer in question, according to the findings of eminent pathologists. But th findings have been strenuously ignored, suppressed, and gaslighted in the mainstream media and by the CDC and the FDAA.

Highly respected pathologists such as the late Professor Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. and Director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg Dr. Peter Schirmacher, as well as Dr. Ryan Cole, have all determined a significant causal link between the COVID vaccines and excess deaths. Most recently, a study which was twice censored against scientific publishers’ own rules, one of the authors of which is Dr. Harvey Risch of the Yale School of Public Health, concluded that out of hundreds of autopsies of sudden post-COVID-vaccine deaths, 74% were likely due to the vaccines.

Yet the work is never even presented for debate, or for the pathologists to defend, which they are willing to do.

Following is the detailed slide presentation made by Dr. Burkhardt at the International Covid Summit at European Parliament iin May 2023.

Pathologist Dr. Arne Burkhardt,Presentation at the International Covid Summit at European Parliament May 2023 (view at Rumble)
(Presentation slides)


Dr. Burkhardt principle conclusions:

“In these 75 cases now we have 78% where we are certain that the death process was in some way influenced by the vaccinat ion…” – Professor Arne Burkhardt, MD, Professor of Pathology Universities of Hamburg, Berne and Tübingen. Final interview in May 2023 before death on May 20, 2023 (transcript)

And:

“Beyond any doubt, injection of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines places lives under threat of illness and death. ” – Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhart and Professor Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Professor Emeritus of the University of Mainz, and winner of the Aronson Prize in Microbiology and Immunology, “On COVID vaccines: why they cannot work, and irrefutable evidence of their causative role in deaths after vaccination.”

And:

“Our review reveals that actually in 77% of the 75 autopsied persons; the vaccination had an important impact on the death process.” – Professor Arne Burkhardt, presentation at European Parliament, May 3, 2023. (transcript)

Dr. Burkhardt’s work was cited in a peer-reviewed Australian paper published at the National Institute of Health (NIH) website, which called for a “suspension” in the use of not just the COVID mRNA vaccines but all mRNA vaccines, writing in the “conclusions” section:

“We… advocate for the suspension of gene-based COVID-19 vaccines and lipid-nanoparticle carrier matrices, and other vaccines based on mRNA or viral-vectorDNA technology.”

TRANSCRIPT of Dr. Burkhardt remarks at European Parliament COVIT Summit, May 2023
(Presentation slides)

“Good afternoon and I would like to thank that I have the opportunity to talk here about the results that we have achieved in the last two years by doing autopsies and bioptic examinations of histopathological specimens in Reutlingen, Germany.

Actually, it was only three months after the vaccination campaign started that the first relatives came to me, and asked me if I could re-evaluate the autopsies that were done by coroners and by other pathologists because they did not believe in natural death causes.

So, by now we have 75 autopsies that we have evaluated and all people that died in timely connection with the vaccination, and increasingly, we get a surgical and bioptical specimens and we are by 50 sub specimens now and they are increasing.

Now, of course, from the beginning when we saw the first cases we realized that there was a new therapeutic vaccine that was a new way of action on the body, so it was clear that there had to be some new disease entities that we had to discover actually, and it was a toxin, apparently not coming from the outside where you examine the contents of the stomach or the serum, but it was a toxin produced by the body itself.

So we had to look for the toxin in the tissue; in the cells, and that meant that we had to develop a method to demonstrate this by (histology?) chemistry in the tissues.

So it became very clear from the first cases that I looked at—first I was alone with this—but it developed into a scientific project because of these many new and very alarming scenes that we saw, and by now, we are about 10 scientists internationally; we are a loose group collaborating in different fields and chemists and physicists and biochemists, working together just depending on the question.

Our review reveals that actually in 77% of the 75 autopsied persons; the vaccination had an important impact on the death process.​

2of11
  • In 77% of the autopsies, the findings indicate that vaccination had an important impact on the death process
  • … all organs are affected
  • … the spike protein is in practically in all organs, mainly in the vessels
  • Image of vessel damage: (2/11)
Now, you have to know that the older the gap, the most more complicated the process of this is, but definitely in these 77%, it was a major contribution.

This is very different from the first reports on the autopsies, which many of them had been done without histology, and in the first diagnosis was there was a natural cause of death in 91%—so only in 10% the possibility of vaccination damage was discussed.

Important is in our series, in 80% these cases, were what we call now the SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome), so they dropped that at home; on the street; in the car, and the advantage for us was that there are practically no therapeutic effects that we have to look for.

So if you have people who have been artificially [ventilated/respirators], you have changes in the lung from the therapeutic methods.

So some basic effect of course is overlap between the true viral infection and the vaccination effects on the body, but this overlap is very small because, first of all there are differences in the composition, like the vaccine has adjuvents, it has contamination, and second, the entrance in the body is different because the natural infection comes through the nose, the throat, and the airways, and this is an epithelium that is immunocompetent. The immune cells are already there, waiting for the virus to enter.

Now, if you inject the vaccination into the muscle, and finally, it always gets into the vessels, and into the blood, so if you do this, this is these are both tissues that have no immunocompetence—so there’s no defence by the body, primarily.

So, it’s the endothelium that is the first a target of the vaccination and as we have endothelium in all organs except for the teeth and some other structures—all organs are affected, and actually we could demonstrate the spike protein in practically all organs—mainly in the vessels.

Heart Tissue (Pfizer/Comirnaty)​

3of11
  • Heart tissue with disintegrated muscle fibres and lymphocytic infiltration
  • Detection of spike protein in the heart tissue (3/11)
The first picture here shows you on the left side a normal a small vessel in the heart muscle and you see these spindle cells that surround the vessel like a wallpaper. They are very delicate, and in the middle in the lumen there are erythrocytes and some leukocytes.

On the right side you see a victim of the vaccination, and you see the small vessel is destroyed, the spindle cells you can still see these are the remnants of the endothelium, and the dark dots are the lymphocytes that are attacking them.

I could show practically in all organs, similar pictures, referring to the preceding presentations also in the testes, in the ovary, and other organs.

So the science and public attention has mainly paid to the acute deaths and adverse effects of the vaccination, and we focused on the long term effects.

We focused on those structures that are not renewables, so this is the heart. We already heard about the myocarditis and you see the destruction by lymphocytes, and on the right side the demonstration of the spike protein.

Brain Tissue​

4of11
  • Needle biopsy of brain tissue (4/11)
  • Damaged vessel with dense infiltration of lymphocyte and bleeding in the surrounding area
Here you can see this is a needle biopsy from the brain, and you see in the middle a vessel with the dense infiltration of lymphocytes and the necrosis and bleeding in the surrounding..... MORE...

...
.
.
.

Conclusion​

So to come to the conclusion.

There are non-regulating elements lost forever, and these are the heart muscle valves, this results in physical weakness, to handicap, and temporarily loss, and actually we had one patient who was an athlete who committed suicide because he could not participate in any competitions anymore.

Second are the nerve cells. These resulted in multiple neurological failure and death, a temporary loss of speech, heavy personality changes, and unconscious periods.

Third (and not so well known and not talked about so much until now) are the elastic lamella. Now, the elastic lamella are never replaced after puberty, so if they are lost they are lost, and what is the consequence? In arterial vessels resulting in immediate necrosis structure death and scar, and if there’s a scar, the elasticity of the order of the arteries are going down, and the blood pressure rises.

So in the skin, this results in premature aging.

I am sorry to say, since people know I have a telephone, they call me, and I will have some kind of a telephone counselling, and one of the most frequent complaints now, is that somebody calls and says, “Well my my husband looks 10 years older since he has been vaccinated,” and I think I know why: Loss of elastic lamella.

So I think these are devastating findings for the long term, because in 10 years nobody will think that maybe the blood pressure rise may have resulted from the lesions in the aorta, so I think this is really alarming, and that is why we have to go to the public. Thank you.”

Well, guess you better bring this up with the trump admin now.
 
" Big Pharma Goofballs Know How To Play Fools "

* Hind Sight By Others Not Duped By Ghouls With The Gold *



NEMJ are stupid as rocks on the issue , as far as statistics indicate from regions around the world that have proved NEMJ conclusions to be little more than horse flatulence .

10. The safety, availability, and cost of ivermectin are nearly unparalleled given its low incidence of important drug interactions along with only mild and rare side effects observed in almost 40 years of use and billions of doses administered.

Currently, as of December 14, 2020, there is accumulating evidence that demonstrates both the safety and efficacy of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. Large-scale epidemiologic analyses validate the findings of in vitro, animal, prophylaxis, and clinical studies. Epidemiologic data from regions of the world with widespread ivermectin use have demonstrated a temporally associated reduction in case counts, hospitalizations, and fatality rates .

Further data supporting a role of ivermectin in decreasing transmission rates can be found from South American countries where, in retrospect, large “natural experiments” seem to have occurred.

Further compounding these alarming developments was a wave of recently published results from therapeutic randomized controlled trials conducted on medicines believed effective for COVID-19 that found a lack of impact on mortality in hospitalized patients with the use of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, interferon, convalescent plasma, and monoclonal antibody therapy.14

Paraguay – COVID-19 case counts and deaths in Alto Parana (bolded blue line) after ivermectin distribution began compared to other regions.

ajt-28-e299-g007.jpg



* Facade On Remdesivir *
Monk-Eye is not an infectious disease scientist and has no knowledge of the NEMJ wonks.

He is gaslighting his lack of knowledge on his betters.
 
" Nobel Prized Safe Inexpensive Antiviral Anti Inflammatory Mechanisms Exposed Abroad "

* Prefers Vaccination With Inflammation To Burst Blood Vessels And Abdication To Despotism *

Monk-Eye is not an infectious disease scientist and has no knowledge of the NEMJ wonks.
He is gaslighting his lack of knowledge on his betters.
Is ignoring the successes so clearly evident from countries that did not buy into the arrogant horse shit of authoritarian ass clowns , and accusing others of ignorance for providing references to studies of proof by national institutes of health outing them , your way of absolving yourself for helping to facilitate the millions of deaths resulting from the negligence of your masters and the idiots that banter to and tow the line for them ?

Recently, evidence has emerged that the oral antiparasitic agent ivermectin exhibits numerous antiviral and anti-inflammatory mechanisms with trial results reporting significant outcome benefits.

* Due Know Fore Get *
 
Back
Top Bottom