As long as the evidence is clear and without doubt... fry the bitch
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as the evidence is clear and without doubt... fry the bitch
As long as the evidence is clear and without doubt... fry the bitch
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
I'd love to know why we feel justified in exacting stiffer sentences against mothers who kill their kids than we do against men.
Men kill their own children and the children of other people every single day. They bash them against walls, they suffocate them, they beat them to death. They rarely spend more than a couple of years (and usually not that much) in prison.
Largely because people STILL think it's the fault of the mothers, even when somebody else does the killing.
Hell, one mom drowned all five kids in the bathtub "methodically" and got hospitalization.
While her acts were criminal, she was crazy and not in control of her mental faculties. That makes a difference to most juries trying to apply the law.
As long as the evidence is clear and without doubt... fry the bitch
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
The point is, there's no such thing as 100% proof.
As long as the evidence is clear and without doubt... fry the bitch
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
The point is, there's no such thing as 100% proof.
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
The point is, there's no such thing as 100% proof.
yes there is... video, audio, or enough witnesses that they couldn't all be in on a plot
Kid murder is the way to the gas house. Doesn't matter whose kid.
Casey Anthony should be beat with a rubber hose for a few months and then hung. Susan Smith should have gotten the same. ~BH
yep. death penalty is only acceptable when there is 100% proof
The point is, there's no such thing as 100% proof.
Yeah there is. Read the link in my sig line.
The man admits he killed Lori....he just objects to dying for his crime. He 100% admits he killed her, knew exactly HOW he killed her, and took the police to her body.
Beyond that, the single largest piece of proof is....
He failed to kill the 10 year old girl that he raped and who witnessed Lori's murder. The (then) 10 year old ID'd the man the *same night* she and Lori were abducted---after escaping from him.
She again ID'd him (at 35 years of age) in 1999 at his new penalty phase trial, where she testified against him again.
I'd say that's 100% proof.
Read up....
Casey Anthony should be beat with a rubber hose for a few months and then hung. Susan Smith should have gotten the same. ~BH
I've got a better one. Chloroform the bitch, wrap her up in duct tape like she did her kid, and leave a small air hole in the mouth.
Then? Stuff her in a trunk for a couple of hours next to a bar.
It's what she did to her child.
If she survives the night? THEN beat her with rubber hoses and hang her.
Casey Anthony should be beat with a rubber hose for a few months and then hung. Susan Smith should have gotten the same. ~BH
I've got a better one. Chloroform the bitch, wrap her up in duct tape like she did her kid, and leave a small air hole in the mouth.
Then? Stuff her in a trunk for a couple of hours next to a bar.
It's what she did to her child.
If she survives the night? THEN beat her with rubber hoses and hang her.
Ok, But can she be beat with a rubber hose for a few hours prior to the Chloroform just in case she doesn't survive the night? ~BH