Capitol Police Deny David Bailey is Killer of Ashli Babbitt. What Goes On?

Rosenbaum was face down on the asphalt by the time the 4th shot was fired. That's how he got hit in the back. That's murder.
Rosenbaum got up and ran away after all four shots were fired, moron.
Why am I still waiting for you to prove this actually happened, fucking moron, and not just in your disturbed imagination?

So far, all you did was post a video in which Rosenbaum isn't in.

Here's one he is in. Looks to me like he's lying there dying, not getting up and running away.



Are you ever not a fucking moron?

Ever??? :ack-1:

I posted the video of the event, moron. Look at it.

You said Rosenbaum was the guy carrying a skateboard. That guy isn't in your video, moron. There's no evidence in that video that your description of events is accurate.

LOLOL

I never said Rosenbaum had a skateboard. I also never said the guy with the skateboard was shot 4 times. And Rosenbaum isn't in the video you posted. At all.

You're a special kind of stupid, fucking moron.
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.

Women didn't say they were disturbed by Biden touching them!

OMG you're a lying fascist sheep, that's hysterical. The Democrats just own your manhood. My God, man. Nancy just keeps your gonads in a jar on the mantle with all the others
 
Actually from his avatar, I am guessing Faun's fantasy is gay sex role play
LOL

Speaking of a lack of self awareness.

:abgg2q.jpg:

Another playground insult from the mental eight year old
Tell me more about your mental 8 year old's playground.

Actually from his avatar, I am guessing Faun's fantasy is gay sex role play


:abgg2q.jpg:

Pass. Now that's creepy, even for you
LOL

It's your post I posted.

Yeah, it wasn't, sick fuck
LOL

Keep running from your own words, kazzer.

Actually from his avatar, I am guessing Faun's fantasy is gay sex role play
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.

Women didn't say they were disturbed by Biden touching them!

OMG you're a lying fascist sheep, that's hysterical. The Democrats just own your manhood. My God, man. Nancy just keeps your gonads in a jar on the mantle with all the others
You just can't stop fantasizing about my gonads, can ya?

:ack-1:
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
Asked and answered.

For some reason, you think people should be disturbed by your hallucinations.
 
"And we're automatically trusting the Washington Post like it was carved in stone by the finger of God because why?"

Well, I don't know much about this 'God's finger' business. I ain't real Godly.

However, I do find the Washington Post an excellent newspaper (even though I get the digital edition).

But in addition to WaPo there is a whole enchilada of sources that list a searchable data base of who was arrested and why. And with some of the more egregious of these dopes, ne'er-do-wells, & knuckleheads there is a brief text describing what they threw or what they used to strike an officer.
Business Insider offers just one of these data bases. I think NPR does too.

So there is that.

And too, I'd point out to 'Fact Check.Org's excellent reportage. Here's what they had to say:



"But a wide array of lethal weapons — including a firearm — were found on protesters at the Capitol.

The Metropolitan Police Department reported its officers, while trying to clear the Capitol grounds about 7 p.m. on Jan. 6, arrested and charged a 33-year-old Maryland man with the federal offense of carrying a fully loaded 9mm semi-automatic handgun on Capitol grounds. The suspect, Christopher Michael Alberts, also was carrying a second magazine.

Social media posts claiming that protesters were not armed also do not address the issue of other weapons used by assailants at the Capitol — or the seizure of guns from supporters before and after the riot.

In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a firearm. While there are laws that specifically address firearms, weapons can include virtually any object used to threaten or cause harm.

According to a database compiled by NPR, of the people charged with violent offenses, including assault on police officers, 15 were armed with deadly or dangerous weapons during the riot at the Capitol."
------------------------------------------------


So there is that.
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
Asked and answered.

For some reason, you think people should be disturbed by your hallucinations.

Yes, I remember. Bripat asked if you were disturbed by Joe's sexual assaults and you lied and said no one complained. You're a misogynist. I guess that explains your gay avatar
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
Asked and answered.

For some reason, you think people should be disturbed by your hallucinations.

Yes, I remember. Bripat asked if you were disturbed by Joe's sexual assaults and you lied and said no one complained. You're a misogynist. I guess that explains your gay avatar
So why should anyone care about bripat's hallucinations?
 
"And we're automatically trusting the Washington Post like it was carved in stone by the finger of God because why?"

Well, I don't know much about this 'God's finger' business. I ain't real Godly.

However, I do find the Washington Post an excellent newspaper (even though I get the digital edition).

But in addition to WaPo there is a whole enchilada of sources that list a searchable data base of who was arrested and why. And with some of the more egregious of these dopes, ne'er-do-wells, & knuckleheads there is a brief text describing what they threw or what they used to strike an officer.
Business Insider offers just one of these data bases. I think NPR does too.

So there is that.

And too, I'd point out to 'Fact Check.Org's excellent reportage. Here's what they had to say:



"But a wide array of lethal weapons — including a firearm — were found on protesters at the Capitol.

The Metropolitan Police Department reported its officers, while trying to clear the Capitol grounds about 7 p.m. on Jan. 6, arrested and charged a 33-year-old Maryland man with the federal offense of carrying a fully loaded 9mm semi-automatic handgun on Capitol grounds. The suspect, Christopher Michael Alberts, also was carrying a second magazine.

Social media posts claiming that protesters were not armed also do not address the issue of other weapons used by assailants at the Capitol — or the seizure of guns from supporters before and after the riot.

In legal terms, “armed” means being in possession of any weapon, not just a firearm. While there are laws that specifically address firearms, weapons can include virtually any object used to threaten or cause harm.


According to a database compiled by NPR, of the people charged with violent offenses, including assault on police officers, 15 were armed with deadly or dangerous weapons during the riot at the Capitol."
------------------------------------------------


So there is that.

*sigh* It's a reference to the Ten Commandments, you unlettered cretin.

Please don't even bother singing me rhapsodies about what's considered an "excellent newspaper" by someone so illiterate he thinks only religious people understand references to THE seminal work of literature in the world, upon which countless other works of literature are based. I wouldn't trust you to recommend me a good toilet paper, let alone a good newspaper.
 
"It's a reference to the Ten Commandments, you unlettered cretin."
Good to know.
Not the 'cretin' dis.
But the 10 Commandments gig.

However, as I've read on this very thread: "I ain't real Godly".

As such, this finger-writing on stones seems a tad fairytale-ish.

No?
 
"I wouldn't trust you to recommend me .......... a good newspaper."
---------------------------------------------------------------


OK, I hear you Cecilie.
Far be it from me to suggest you try to read, WaPo, The New York Times, the LA Times, or the Wall Street Journal. If you don't want such recommendations, well, I won't make 'em.

Nonetheless, you post begs the question: Just what newspapers, media, talking heads, podcasts, broadcasts, would you recommend to the venue as good fare by your standards.

In short, poster Cecilie, just where do you get your news?
 
"It's a reference to the Ten Commandments, you unlettered cretin."
Good to know.
Not the 'cretin' dis.
But the 10 Commandments gig.

However, as I've read on this very thread: "I ain't real Godly".

As such, this finger-writing on stones seems a tad fairytale-ish.

No?

As opposed to what? Men becoming women just by throwing on a dress and some lipstick?
 
"Men becoming women just by throwing on a dress and some lipstick?"
----------------------------------------------------------

Cecilie, ....and I mean this sincerely......this not the thread (or the time and place) to fret about those who you feel are your competition.

So focus, girlfriend. We are talking about the January 6th Insurrection and the defensive shooting of a rioter who had violently breached an entryway despite police warning her not to and even pointing a firearm at her.

That's the subject at hand. Not your fear of some Jolene with a 5 o'clock shadow poaching your man.

IMHO
 
"I wouldn't trust you to recommend me .......... a good newspaper."
---------------------------------------------------------------


OK, I hear you Cecilie.
Far be it from me to suggest you try to read, WaPo, The New York Times, the LA Times, or the Wall Street Journal. If you don't want such recommendations, well, I won't make 'em.

Nonetheless, you post begs the question: Just what newspapers, media, talking heads, podcasts, broadcasts, would you recommend to the venue as good fare by your standards.

In short, poster Cecilie, just where do you get your news?

Yes, it SHOULD be far from you to suggest ANY reading material for me.

What you're failing to understand is the difference between my definition of "news source" and yours. To you, a news source is someone whose article you read and then run off and repeat in the belief that it's the complete, unbiased truth. To me, a news source is someone who tells me what the current stories are, and points me in the direction of the source documents so that I can research it myself.

As such, I usually find out what the current stories are from people who are honest enough to admit they have some bias, like most people do. I also hear about the current events because of regular people around me talking about them . . . and then I go research the facts.
 
"Men becoming women just by throwing on a dress and some lipstick?"
----------------------------------------------------------

Cecilie, ....and I mean this sincerely......this not the thread (or the time and place) to fret about those who you feel are your competition.

So focus, girlfriend. We are talking about the January 6th Insurrection and the defensive shooting of a rioter who had violently breached an entryway despite police warning her not to and even pointing a firearm at her.

That's the subject at hand. Not your fear of some Jolene with a 5 o'clock shadow poaching your man.

IMHO

Chill . . . and I mean this sincerely . . . this is not the thread (or the time and place) for you to come out about your fetish for trannies.

So focus, vermin. You were trying to play off your lack of education and basic literacy as being too "scientific", and when you got called on it, you tried to deflect - badly - off into an ad hominem attack.

I'm still waiting for you to say something about the thread topic other than, "My talking points make me feel all smart 'n' stuff". Whenever you're ready. The transgender porn your public school taught in place of Shakespeare really isn't interesting to anyone but you.
 
"I wouldn't trust you to recommend me .......... a good newspaper."
---------------------------------------------------------------


OK, I hear you Cecilie.
Far be it from me to suggest you try to read, WaPo, The New York Times, the LA Times, or the Wall Street Journal. If you don't want such recommendations, well, I won't make 'em.

Nonetheless, you post begs the question: Just what newspapers, media, talking heads, podcasts, broadcasts, would you recommend to the venue as good fare by your standards.

In short, poster Cecilie, just where do you get your news?

Yes, it SHOULD be far from you to suggest ANY reading material for me.

What you're failing to understand is the difference between my definition of "news source" and yours. To you, a news source is someone whose article you read and then run off and repeat in the belief that it's the complete, unbiased truth. To me, a news source is someone who tells me what the current stories are, and points me in the direction of the source documents so that I can research it myself.

As such, I usually find out what the current stories are from people who are honest enough to admit they have some bias, like most people do. I also hear about the current events because of regular people around me talking about them . . . and then I go research the facts.
LOL

Dayum, you're so embarrassed by your news sources, you won't even name one.
 
To me, a news source is someone who tells me what the current stories are, and points me in the direction of the source documents......."

That is so cool poster Cecilie.

So, those news sources that tell you 'what the current stories are'....would be, ummm, who?

You can share here, as it could be instructive to other posters who perhaps don't have the ability or resources you do.

In short, you could mentor any number of them in how to form an informed opinion.
It could be good for you.
----------------------------
Now, as to you still waiting for my poor avatar to, in your words: " to say something about the thread topic..."

Well, that's my fault if I hadn't been adequately clear on my opinion about that unfortunate misguided woman's tragic death. It was a tragedy multiplied---for her, of course, but also her family, and also the uniformed officer. Her absorption in the Big Lie of a fraudulent election led her, inexorably, to violently breach that door. And the unsurprising bullet.

I thought I was clear on that, when I posted this above:

"So focus, girlfriend. We are talking about the January 6th Insurrection and the defensive shooting of a rioter who had violently breached an entryway despite police warning her not to and even pointing a firearm at her..."

Perhaps, and I mean no disrespect, poster Cecilie, but perhaps.....I should use a larger font for you?

Just sayin' ;)
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
Asked and answered.

For some reason, you think people should be disturbed by your hallucinations.
I posted photos, not hallucinations.
 

I'm not the one who picked a gay avatar, you did

It's your fantasy. I can't help you with that.

And your fantasy is being punished for being a bad boy ...
Like I said, you cons sure do enjoy your homoerotic fantasies.

You're still the one who picked the gay sex role play avatar, not me. There's nothing wrong with being gay, relax
Yet you're the one who can't stop fantasizing about gay sex. Seems my avatar triggered you.

So if I notice you have a blue shirt on, that means I have a blue shirt on. Sure it does.

Why does being gay bother you so much? This is 2021, it's cool. Relax
If you you can't stop talking about it, it's your obsession.

You have zero self awareness. I wouldn't worry about being gay though, no one cares
I'm happy for you that you're comfortable in your own skin.

LOL, another eight year old playground response. Eight year old is the most advanced you get
Going after the underaged again? Very disturbing.
Where you disturbed by this?

iu
They weren't, why should you?
Two of them obviously were. I'm always disturbed by politicians who display obvious symptoms of being a pervert.
Nope, you say they were disturbed, they never said that.
Nope. I asked you if you were disturbed. However, you obviously approve of perverts so long as the are Democrats.
Asked and answered.

For some reason, you think people should be disturbed by your hallucinations.
I posted photos, not hallucinations.
LOL

It's your hallucinations which are trying to explain the photos.
 

Forum List

Back
Top