Capitalism is NOT Democratic: Democracy is NOT Capitalist

Capitalism has never existed without war and debt.
medium_leninimperialismprogress.jpg

Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism

So what?
 
yeah it’s the Is fault not Kim Sung
Kim would have never been in the running for president of a united Korea in 1945

People's Republic of Korea - Wikipedia

"When Soviet troops entered Pyongyang on 24 August 1945, they found a local People's Committee established there, led by veteran Christian nationalist Cho Man-sik.[6]: p.54–57 

"Unlike their American counterparts, the Soviet authorities recognized and worked with the People's Committees[7]: pp.105–107 [8]: p.227–228 

"By some accounts, Cho Man-sik was the Soviet government's first choice to lead North Korea.[9"
 
Kim would have never been in the running for president of a united Korea in 1945

People's Republic of Korea - Wikipedia

"When Soviet troops entered Pyongyang on 24 August 1945, they found a local People's Committee established there, led by veteran Christian nationalist Cho Man-sik.[6]: p.54–57 

"Unlike their American counterparts, the Soviet authorities recognized and worked with the People's Committees[7]: pp.105–107 [8]: p.227–228 

"By some accounts, Cho Man-sik was the Soviet government's first choice to lead North Korea.[9"
yeah then the Socialist made his disappear when he opposed their plans…and Kim was made president after their invasion

read the next paragraph of your link
 
Kim would have never been in the running for president of a united Korea in 1945

People's Republic of Korea - Wikipedia

"When Soviet troops entered Pyongyang on 24 August 1945, they found a local People's Committee established there, led by veteran Christian nationalist Cho Man-sik.[6]: p.54–57 

"Unlike their American counterparts, the Soviet authorities recognized and worked with the People's Committees[7]: pp.105–107 [8]: p.227–228 

"By some accounts, Cho Man-sik was the Soviet government's first choice to lead North Korea.[9"
A "people's committee" - a gang of communists, in other words.
 
Not even close, Trump.

Bill Black: Lenders’ Lies about Liar’s Loans and “Rigorous Underwriting” | naked capitalism

"The definition of liar’s loan is that the lender does not verify the borrower’s income (and more extreme liar’s loans do not verify the borrower’s job or assets).

"The CEO causes the lender to make liar’s loans for the purpose of inflating the borrower’s reported income, which makes it possible for the lender to make more and larger loans, which enriches the CEO."
How does going bankrupt enrich the CEO? Banks allowed so-called "liar" loans because the regulators wouldn't allow mergers unless a bank met their "diversity" requirements, which meant they had to have so many mortgages to black people on their books. The feds facilitated this loans by rating them as safe.
 

Forum List

Back
Top