Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Well you seemed to claim in you OP sentence that forest burning down was somehow acceptable since it is "natural."
>The flaw in the OP is that the carbon released burning wood is natural
I take issue with that.
The fact that fossil fuels are "natural" resources is inarguable, and burning them actually has tremendous benefits to humanity, unlike burning forests.
The sink grows back. Where do you think the carbon comes from?
Is that what your kitchen counter tests are showing? ...
No, that is the data from the two and only two measures of Earth atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons.... nice try...
Is that what your kitchen counter tests are showing? ... what is your data? ...
The Co2 fraud side has nothing. It failed to prove increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming.
GAME OVER
THEORY REJECTED
what experiment can we perform to demonstrate your claims?
Well, to demonstrate the "claim," we would need to measure atmospheric temps while Co2 was rising, and WE DID THAT and the result was NO WARMING until your side lost it in 2005 and FUDGED BOTH the satellite and balloon data, posted on USMB 5000 times already...
There is no need for an "experiment." THAT was the experiment. We increased atmospheric Co2 and atmospheric temps did not go up = BUSTED LYING
Can you post the results of this experiment? ... we'll want to look at the surface parameters, 1000 mb, 700 mb, 500 mb and 300 mb ... and the corrections made for El Niño and the other atmospheric oscillations ... including the solar cycle ... and who calibrated which equipment? ... and include your control data as well please ...
You've never done a scientific experiment in your entire life ... have you? ...
You'd have to sue to get the data. Nobody is disputing THE DATA showed NO WARMING. What there is a debate about is whether
"orbit wobble" justified fudging the satellites higher = laughable BS
"shade issue" may justify tweaking the balloons all a certain amount but CONSTANT the whole time, would never justify taking no warming and fudging it to warming (or cooling)
Your side is laughable fudge and fraud.
My first science experiment was dissecting a lizard in junior high...
| June 10: | 424.10 ppm |
| June 09: | 424.46 ppm |
| June 08: | 423.62 ppm |
| June 07: | 424.44 ppm |
| June 06: | 424.43 ppm |
Now this is the real pisser and a reason why we're already fucked. By adding co2 into the system we're also enhancing the natural systems that produce co2 and they're huge. If we don't stop and find ways to suck this shit out of our atmosphere we will have run away global warming.
or do you already know the results will make you look like a complete fool
The actual atmosphere is what we are measuring, not one of your old liquor bottles...
My claim is global warming
You have no warming, so no data now to analyze.
If Earth has two polar oceans and hence no ice, it warms. Atmosphere thickens. It rains all the time.
Snakes are 80 feet long, sharks are 60 feet long....
good for humans... according to you... a bottle playing MORON
Oh ... you have no data ... so your claims are religious in nature ... all bow to the great SSDD ... the Queen of Sweden will want to speak with you over this ...
So why are there fossils of such creatures from past periods?
