Can you say "martinet"?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then what was the urgent need for these ex military people to join together and post this video?

Because a criminal sits in the Oval Office, and he is clearly testing the limits of his law and of his power.

Or because cherries are red.

Doesn't matter, it's protected speech.

 

[Rogue AI]

No, there isn't. Stop making shit up.

I'm a 20 year vet, stooge. I spent more time on active duty and have more medals than our alcoholic Secretary of Defense.

Every lifer has known a clown like Hegseth.

You dipshits fucked up and ran with Bone Spur's bullshit claim of sedition and his call for the death penalty, and you don't have the integrity to admit he is wrong.

Dead wrong.

The only traitor in this picture is the one who attempted a coup.

And you think you aren't in a cult.

Wrong, there no legitimate purpose in members of Congress directly addressing the troops. Separation of powers comes to mind. If there are questions of the legality of orders given Congress can hold a hearing. This seditious stunt will backfire.

 

[Rogue AI]

Because a criminal sits in the Oval Office, and he is clearly testing the limits of his law and of his power.

Or because cherries are red.

Doesn't matter, it's protected speech.

It is not protected if the intent is to degrade good order and discipline. Try harder.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wrong, there no legitimate purpose in members of Congress directly addressing the troops.

Now congresspeople can't address the troops.

We have crossed through the armoire into Trumplandia.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, there isn't. Stop making shit up.

Hegseth cited it in his tweet.

Stop making shit up.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is not protected if the intent is to degrade good order and discipline.

It is. Sorry. You don't get to invent intent anyway, except for in your own mind.

 

[Rogue AI]

Now congresspeople can't address the troops.

We have crossed through the armoire into Trumplandia.

Not to encourage mutiny and dissent.

 

[Rogue AI]

It is. Sorry. You don't get to invent intent anyway, except for in your own mind.

I'm not inventing anything here, refer to federal laws and the UCMJ.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So let's try to make sense of the MAGA fantasy, here.

These Congresspeople are going to be found, through a crack investigation, to have conspired to harm troop morale and discipline.

That the message did not just possibly result in such a thing, but that it was their intent.

Let's all pause to consider how stupid this is. What a hilarious, ad hoc, dead end theory they have been spoonfed by paid liars scrambling to pay their rent.

 

[g5000]

Fox News weekend alcoholic anchor Pete Hegseth's colossal ignorance of our readiness and that of our enemies is astounding:

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'm not inventing anything here, refer to federal laws and the UCMJ.

Which don't show any intent on the congresspeople's part. You're incoherent.

 

[TemplarKormac]

I'm a 20 year vet, stooge. I spent more time on active duty and have more medals than our alcoholic Secretary of Defense.

So was my father.

I don't need to be a vet to know the UCMJ. So don't bother parading your service around.

My father earned a purple heart. He fought in Grenada and Iraq, was a paid mercenary for the IDF.

He educated me about military life hoping maybe I'd join. It didn't happen,
but I still have the knowledge.

Unless you and your left wing buddies can be more specific, your arguments are trash.

 

[g5000]

So was my father.

I don't need to be a vet to know the UCMJ.

You obviously know NOTHING of the UCMJ. You made shit up about it.

You're dismissed.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I'll say it again:

Nothing Kelly said is controversial. But he sure did smoke out the cult.

When you say, "Punch a Nazi!", and people show up to object... welp, you found the Nazis.

 

[Rogue AI]

Which don't show any intent on the congresspeople's part. You're incoherent.

That is not for you or I to decide. A robust investigation into the matter is clearly warranted. If laws were broken, remember the liberal mantra, 'nobody is above the law'.

 

[g5000]

That is not for you or I to decide. A robust investigation into the matter is clearly warranted. If laws were broken, remember the liberal mantra, 'nobody is above the law'.

A military member is allowed to disobey an unlawful order.

There. Investigation done.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You obviously know NOTHING of the UCMJ. You made shit up about it.

You're dismissed.

Run along then. Take your overly emotional arguments with you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That is not for you or I to decide.

Irrelevant. You're suggesting someone could prove intent. Because you haven't thought that out. Because you are cornered into doing so.

Think about the absurdity of what you suggest... that somehow there exists evidence they intended to hurt discipline or moral.

That's where you are. It's absurd.

 

[Rogue AI]

A military member is allowed to disobey an unlawful order.

There. Investigation done.

Which unlawful order are you talking about? You have none. Nor will the determination of legality be handled by videos. Some poor sap listening to these seditious scum will decide for themselves an order is unlawful, find out it isn't, and pay a steep price for it. That is all this is inviting. These scum congresscritters can and will do nothing for the poor sap that listens to their seditious nonsense. That degrades good order and discipline.

 

[TemplarKormac]

You obviously know NOTHING of the UCMJ. You made shit up about it.

You're dismissed.

Read the damn tweet. By the gods man.