Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 19,224
- 5,638
- 265
You do NOT know the law.Totally wrong.
I know the law and it absurd and impossible for Trump to be remotely guilty, and once the defense has the opportunity to explain what the actual law says, instead of what Jack Smith lied about.
There is not even a remote chance that Trump could possibly be convicted of ANY of the charges.
That the classified doc example, the law is clear that presidents ARE the arbitrary source of all classified doc authority. Presidents can and are supposed to give permanent copies of any classified docs to anyone they want, and that includes to themselves.
NARA owns nothing, and they actually are there only to serve the president and satisfy FOIA.
Neither allow NARA to take anything from an ex-president.
With the hush money, we just have to look at the John Edwards case to see that paying hush money is legal. It is instead demanding hush money that is illegal blackmail.
With Jan 6, clearly it was not an "insurrection" by any possible interpretation.
Instead, the only ACTUAL crime is to try to interfere with the election through the use of invalid prosecutions. And for that, it is Jack Smith who should be prosecuted.
You consistently make false claims about what is illegal or legal.
You just make it up as you go because you are ignorant.
Just one of many examples you have claimed it is legal to riot. There is no such law and it is never legal you ignorant lying bastard