Can Someone Point Out How The Iran Situation is Any Better Than it was in June 2025?

[Marener]

Was that before or after the "bombing?" LOL

Until you link to what Iran said, there’s nothing else to talk about.

Nothing you say has enough detail or specificity to be taken seriously.

 

[Winco]

You are a Democrat Party hack, it's pointless to explain anything to you.

So nothing.......I assume you are waiting for the 'memo' with the 'talking points'

So weak.

The chances of nuke exploding in Wash DC is now zero

What was it a year ago, before this useless WAR, when trump said we "Obliterated" their Nuclear Operations.
Doesn't this ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ mean 'no chance of return.'




Here, I'll help you out.

To obliterate means to completely destroy something so that nothing remains or to erase all signs, traces, or memories of it.

 

[martybegan]

Is this an excuse to basically do whatever you want and ignore any intelligence you want?

No, it's realizing we don't know the end situation of this yet.

You guys would have given up the Union Cause after 1st Bull Run.

 

[martybegan]

Poor Zippy, reduced again to flinging senseless insults at words on the screen.

Poor trollbitch, using tired SJW tropes when thinking they are making "points"

 

[Marener]

No, it's realizing we don't know the end situation of this yet.

You guys would have given up the Union Cause after 1st Bull Run.

So it’s all just wishful thinking.

As expected.

 

[jotathought]

As you may remember, that was when we first “obliterated” their nuke program.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/22/nx-s1-5441763/details-emerge-about-operation-midnight-hammer

As a deal has apparently been reached that will open the Strait of Hormuz but not result in any turnover of nuke material...

Can someone point out the material positive gains were made by our 100+ days of war that are markedly different than the situation we had last June?

Anyone?

Sure. As the world’s leading state sponsor of terrorism according to the U.S. and many Western governments, Iran’s influence extends far beyond its borders through a network of proxy groups and militant organizations.

A deal that curbs Iran’s nuclear ambitions, reduces its ability to threaten shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, and constrains its support for terrorist proxies has implications well beyond Iran itself. Given the importance of Hormuz to global energy markets and Iran’s longstanding role in funding, training, and arming militant groups throughout the region, any meaningful reduction in those risks is generally viewed as a benefit to global security and economic stability.

Is this something you don’t support?

 

[martybegan]

So it’s all just wishful thinking.

As expected.

Nope, wishful thinking is believing men can turn into women and vice versa.

 

[jotathought]

It was zero in June 2025 too.
They didn’t control the flow of oil in 2025
The proxies are weakened...was that really worth all the pain at the pump though?
As for their being “on their knees”....that’s just silly.

20% of the worlds oil comes through the strait of Hormuz .. today just as it did in 2025. How could you be so obtuse not to recognize this?

 

[Marener]

Nope, wishful thinking is believing men can turn into women and vice versa.

I mean, you had a chance to provide insight into why you believe what you believe and your response indicated there’s nothing there.

You can deny any intelligence you want because the Germans screwed up in 1941. That’s desperate.

 

[martybegan]

I mean, you had a chance to provide insight into why you believe what you believe and your response indicated there’s nothing there.

You can deny any intelligence you want because the Germans screwed up in 1941. That’s desperate.

years of watching global politics.

Decades of reading on history.

Being able to admit we aren't seeing all the data of the current situation.

You just have TDS and snark.

 

[Zincwarrior]

And, presumably, that will be addressed in this deal. One way or the other.

Hence why I want to see what they actually agreed to vs. what each side is saying they agreed to.

 

[Rawley]

Hence why I want to see what they actually agreed to vs. what each side is saying they agreed to.

Do you think Trump would sign any deal that would allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon?

 

[Marener]

years of watching global politics.

And how does that support your belief? It’s just hand waving.

Decades of reading on history.

Same as above. More hand waving.

Say something specific.

Being able to admit we aren't seeing all the data of the current situation.

That’s not an excuse to make up what you don’t know.

You just have TDS and snark.

I have questions that you won’t answer.

Because there are no answers.

 

[martybegan]

And how does that support your belief? It’s just hand waving.

Same as above. More hand waving.

Say something specific.

That’s not an excuse to make up what you don’t know.

I have questions that you won’t answer.

Because there are no answers.

What a steaming load of nothing.

 

[Marener]

What a steaming load of nothing.

That’s what your post left me thinking.

All I did was ask why you believe the Iranian regime is going to end soon, and your reply was “I read history and watch politics”, which is meaningless.

It’s all wishful thinking.

 

[BlindBoo]

Poor trollbitch, using tired SJW tropes when thinking they are making "points"

Sure thing Sparkles. All SJW's are taught to use the Geneva Conventions as talking points........

 

[Zincwarrior]

Do you think Trump would sign any deal that would allow Iran to obtain a nuclear weapon?

I think he might sign an MOA that opens the Straits and punts on everything else.

 

[martybegan]

Sure thing Sparkles. All SJW's are taught to use the Geneva Conventions as talking points........

Again, you only care about the Convention when you can use it against the US and Israel.

Everyone else can break the rules because you jerk off to dead Jews and dead Americans.

 

[Rawley]

I think he might sign an MOA that opens the Straits and punts on everything else.

Doubt it. He's the first President that refused to kick the can down the road. Why do you believe he would start today?

 

[Zincwarrior]

Doubt it. He's the first President that refused to kick the can down the road. Why do you believe he would start today?

He wants and needs to get out.