Can socialists in this country explain how taxing American corporations/companies more is good?

[Skull Pilot]

How the fuck can we fund the country and pay down the debt without taxes ?

Would you rather we just taxed working stiffs and let the companies off ?

Oh. All the winner countries are socialists .

Goal is not to pay down the debt. It's additional cover for moar FSA 'Free Shit Army' stuff.

Well that's another issue isn't it . But you tell me , how do we give vets free VA healthcare without taxes ?

Easy we abolish the VA use that money to set up a group insurance plan for veterans that will let them get the care they need from a doctor or hospital they choose

 

[Conservative65]

Can socialists in this country explain how taxing American corporations/companies more is good?

Because pixie dust won't eliminate the national debt.

Blame Austerity, Not Obama, For Slow Economic Recovery

​

Not spending on things for which the federal government has no delegated power will do the same. You can't spend like a drunken sailor adding almost doubling the debt in 7 1/2 years then claim the solution is to raise taxes. Stop spending.

Fact: Republicans have historically been the largest contributors to the national debt.

How much new debt has Obama created that wasn't a direct or indirect result of Bush actions and/or policies? The Bush clusterfuck didn't just end on the day Obama was sworn in as president.

That's not a fact, douche bag. You have never posted a fact in your entire forum career.

When something happened when Bush was President, they blamed it on Bush saying "it was on his watch". When something happens during Obama's presidency, they blame it on Bush. What happened to the "it was on his watch" mindset they had with Bush?

 

[Conservative65]

Can socialists in this country explain how taxing American corporations/companies more is good?

Because pixie dust won't eliminate the national debt.

Blame Austerity, Not Obama, For Slow Economic Recovery

​

Can anyone see the massive liberal irony in this post?

Why no austerity and loss of hundreds of thousands of government jobs when Reagan and Bush were trying to dig out of recession? They spent like drunken sailors. Obama has been obstructed from having the same recovery measures.

Blame Austerity, Not Obama, For Slow Economic Recovery

​

$9 trillion in new debt is austerity?

No, refusing to spend any money on the usual solutions is austerity, stupid, mindlessly obstructive GOP austerity.

You mean the usual solutions Democrats propose that don't work? Nothing stupid about not wasting money on that shit.

 

[Theowl32]

How the fuck can we fund the country and pay down the debt without taxes ?

Would you rather we just taxed working stiffs and let the companies off ?

Oh. All the winner countries are socialists .

Feel free to move to one of your socialist utopias

You have to understand something about these trust fund elitist losers. They all have money that they have not earned. IF you have money, you really do not feel the sting of socialism. Shiit, if you have money, you could probably have a good time in Somalia.

All of the left wing robots that post here have no clue about running a business, or what it means for a poor person to have opportunities. If they did, they would be sickened by the insidious regulations foisted upon the small business owner. Instead they defend regulations and fines on businesses for having the unmitigated gall to use the word "waitress" in their want adds. They would see the absurdity for fining businesses for using the wrong PREFERRED pronoun.

Instead they see "the logic" and agree it is all about "equal rights," or "safety," or "concerns for the environment."

We had to know that generations of spoiled pieces of left wing elitist shit would ruin us. We know it has happened before, therefore it is bound to happen again.

Case in point.

Do you know those two morons believe they are victims of white America?

Look at Jaden Smith trying to portray himself as some sort of angry renegade.

They are pathetic aren't they? Trust me. That is what we are dealing with in regards to every pathetic trust fund elitist left winger.

They have no fucking clue.

 

[Theowl32]

I'm still waiting for owl-boy (or -girl) to come back and read the explanation I gave him/her.

I would never read any of your bullshit.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Go ahead and explain why that is a good thing for the country.

Keep in mind folks that the American socialists are by far the dumbest people on the planet.

Let us hear why American companies should be taxed more and why that is a good thing.

Corporations are getting their hands on more and more of the value of the productivity of American workers.

Through taxation, we take some of that back.

 

[owebo]

Go ahead and explain why that is a good thing for the country.

Keep in mind folks that the American socialists are by far the dumbest people on the planet.

Let us hear why American companies should be taxed more and why that is a good thing.

Corporations are getting their hands on more and more of the value of the productivity of American workers.

Through taxation, we take some of that back.

Huh? You think confiscation of wealth from makers is good why?

 

[Mr Natural]

Huh? You think confiscation of wealth from makers is good why?

And you think confiscation of earnings from workers is better?

 

[owebo]

Huh? You think confiscation of wealth from makers is good why?

And you think confiscation of earnings from workers is better?

Not at all, but this isn't a chicken and egg thing....workers earn from makers creating wealth.....no makers, no earners....

 

[NYcarbineer]

Go ahead and explain why that is a good thing for the country.

Keep in mind folks that the American socialists are by far the dumbest people on the planet.

Let us hear why American companies should be taxed more and why that is a good thing.

Corporations are getting their hands on more and more of the value of the productivity of American workers.

Through taxation, we take some of that back.

Huh? You think confiscation of wealth from makers is good why?

American workers ARE the makers, dumbass. Learn to read.

 

[Mr Natural]

Not at all, but this isn't a chicken and egg thing....workers earn from makers creating wealth.....no makers, no earners....

It absolutely is a chicken/egg thing.

Without earners, how would Rockerfeller gotten the oil to market?

 

[owebo]

Not at all, but this isn't a chicken and egg thing....workers earn from makers creating wealth.....no makers, no earners....

It absolutely is a chicken/egg thing.

Without earners, how would Rockerfeller gotten the oil to market?

No....you're just clueless....it's ok, all the liberals are....

 

[Mr Natural]

No....you're just clueless....it's ok, all the liberals are....

You have no reply and I'm the clueless one?

Answer the question. How would Carnegie have gotten his steel to market without workers?

And do you even know who Carnegie was?

 

[bripat9643]

Can anyone see the massive liberal irony in this post?

Why no austerity and loss of hundreds of thousands of government jobs when Reagan and Bush were trying to dig out of recession? They spent like drunken sailors. Obama has been obstructed from having the same recovery measures.

Blame Austerity, Not Obama, For Slow Economic Recovery

​

$9 trillion in new debt is austerity?

No, refusing to spend any money on the usual solutions is austerity, stupid, mindlessly obstructive GOP austerity.

In other words, yes.

Thank for playing!

7-8 trillion is about what you need to spend to avert a full blown depression, STILL 300 billion for assistance for victims. Great job, GOP.

Bullsit. You avoid a depression.by keeping the government'sout of the economy. Government is the cause of almost every recession or depression.

 

[Indeependent]

Why no austerity and loss of hundreds of thousands of government jobs when Reagan and Bush were trying to dig out of recession? They spent like drunken sailors. Obama has been obstructed from having the same recovery measures.

Blame Austerity, Not Obama, For Slow Economic Recovery

​

$9 trillion in new debt is austerity?

No, refusing to spend any money on the usual solutions is austerity, stupid, mindlessly obstructive GOP austerity.

In other words, yes.

Thank for playing!

7-8 trillion is about what you need to spend to avert a full blown depression, STILL 300 billion for assistance for victims. Great job, GOP.

Bullsit. You avoid a depression.by keeping the government'sout of the economy. Government is the cause of almost every recession or depression.

Nope.

 

[bripat9643]

$9 trillion in new debt is austerity?

No, refusing to spend any money on the usual solutions is austerity, stupid, mindlessly obstructive GOP austerity.

In other words, yes.

Thank for playing!

7-8 trillion is about what you need to spend to avert a full blown depression, STILL 300 billion for assistance for victims. Great job, GOP.

Bullsit. You avoid a depression.by keeping the government'sout of the economy. Government is the cause of almost every recession or depression.

Nope.

Yep

 

[Indeependent]

No, refusing to spend any money on the usual solutions is austerity, stupid, mindlessly obstructive GOP austerity.

In other words, yes.

Thank for playing!

7-8 trillion is about what you need to spend to avert a full blown depression, STILL 300 billion for assistance for victims. Great job, GOP.

Bullsit. You avoid a depression.by keeping the government'sout of the economy. Government is the cause of almost every recession or depression.

Nope.

Yep

Yep to my nope...thank you.

 

[owebo]

No....you're just clueless....it's ok, all the liberals are....

You have no reply and I'm the clueless one?

Answer the question. How would Carnegie have gotten his steel to market without workers?

And do you even know who Carnegie was?

My reply was well over your education level, as evidenced by your posts....

 

[Mr Natural]

My reply was well over your education level, as evidenced by your posts....

Insults are the best you got, ay?

Let me explain it so even a simpleton like you can maybe understand it.

Without makers, there are no earners. Without earners, the maker ceases to exist.

Chicken/egg. Get it now?

 

[owebo]

My reply was well over your education level, as evidenced by your posts....

Insults are the best you got, ay?

Fact, insult.....whatever allows you to deal with your lack of education, I am ok with it....