Can Obama be the VP for Biden?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
51,771
51,579
3,615
Legally?

What if he is on the ticket and the ticket wins; and then Biden steps down?

I think the Dims should go for it.
 
He does need somebody younger as his VP pick. What's Wilford Brimley doing these days?
 
Obama who has gotten his oceanfront mansion after declaring the seas will rise will use his staff bequeathed from Moses and keep the encroaching waters at bay!
 
Legally?

What if he is on the ticket and the ticket wins; and then Biden steps down?

I think the Dims should go for it.

The 12th and 22nd Amendment prohibits it.

The 12th states that no person who is ineligible to run for the presidency can run for the vice presidency.

the 22nd Amendment makes Obama, Bush-43 and Bill Clinton ineligible to run for President and therefor ineligible to run for Vice President.


It's an odd combination of Amendments, that has only really applied to five people in our history, The three I mentioned above, Reagan and Eisenhower. It didn't apply to Jerry Ford since he had only served one partial term, and there was serious consideration to making him VP on Reagan's ticket.
 
The 12th and 22nd Amendment prohibits it.

The 12th states that no person who is ineligible to run for the presidency can run for the vice presidency.

the 22nd Amendment makes Obama, Bush-43 and Bill Clinton ineligible to run for President and therefor ineligible to run for Vice President.


It's an odd combination of Amendments, that has only really applied to five people in our history, The three I mentioned above, Reagan and Eisenhower. It didn't apply to Jerry Ford since he had only served one partial term, and there was serious consideration to making him VP on Reagan's ticket.

As the source to which you've linked clearly states, the matter is unresolved.

The intent would seem to be as you say, but the wording suggests differently. It prohibits one from being elected president who has already served two terms, but does not explicitly prohibit any such person from becoming President through some other path than being elected directly to that office. If the situation ever comes up, this will need to be resolved through the courts.
 
The VP has to meet eligibility requirements for being President. Obama does not qualify because he is termed out.

He's not eligible to be elected President again. The Twenty-second Amendment is clear on that point.

But due to a subtlety in the use of words, he may still be eligible to serve another term as President, if he gets into that position by some other means than being directly elected. The way that the Twenty-second Amendment is worded does not clearly prohibit a former President, who has already served two terms, from holding any other position in the line of succession to the Presidency, or from taking office as President if those above him in that line are all taken off the table.

This is something that, at some point, the courts will have to settle.
 
is there a law? couldent he do like Teddy Roosvelt and just go for a third term under the banner of a third party like TR did?

Paris_Tuileries_Garden_Facepalm_statue.jpg
 
The VP has to meet eligibility requirements for being President. Obama does not qualify because he is termed out.

He's not eligible to be elected President again. The Twenty-second Amendment is clear on that point.

But due to a subtlety in the use of words, he may still be eligible to serve another term as President, if he gets into that position by some other means than being directly elected. The way that the Twenty-second Amendment is worded does not clearly prohibit a former President, who has already served two terms, from holding any other position in the line of succession to the Presidency, or from taking office as President if those above him in that line are all taken off the table.

This is something that, at some point, the courts will have to settle.


so was it the 23rd amendment that foiled Roosvelts run? not advocating such, just tossi g it out there.
 
As the source to which you've linked clearly states, the matter is unresolved.

The intent would seem to be as you say, but the wording suggests differently. It prohibits one from being elected president who has already served two terms, but does not explicitly prohibit any such person from becoming President through some other path than being elected directly to that office. If the situation ever comes up, this will need to be resolved through the courts.

Okay, but then why would you put together a ticket that would almost immediately be challenged in the courts.

Obviously, this is a law that only currently applies to three people, none of whom probably want to engage in that mess again. We have 328 million other people in the country that this doesn't apply to.

Now, for the extra scary thought for today. WHEN (not if) Trump is defeated in November, there's nothing keeping him from running again in 2024. That should keep Republicans up at night.
 

Forum List

Back
Top