I didn't say you said created equaled saved.
Whatever your interpretation, I wish you would stop saying 2.9 as if that were something other than the upper limit of a very wide range. The figure given was 1 to 2.9 million.
I've already given you an example. The money could have been used on infrastructure. Some of the states which had the greatest need of economic stimulus also had the greatest need of planners to help them design projects and get past all the red tape. Obama could have noticed in a timely manner that the shovel ready jobs weren't ready, and he could have gotten teams out to help make them so. Instead of doing that and instead of keeping other time sensitive promises (immigration, anyone?) he was out hawking Obamacare.
What wide range are you referring to? 2.9 million jobs is the official number the CBO gave.
I think it is unfair you are being so black and white about this. Why can't you just admit that it is a good thing the stimulus created millions of jobs. Facts are what they are.
"In other words, between 1.0 million and 2.9 million people employed in June owed their jobs to the Recovery Act." That is from your link.
2.9 was the upper limit on the estimate. The lower limit was 1 million.
Three months later, the range was 0.4 million to 2.4 million jobs.
It's a fine thing that people had jobs. I maintain that jobs would have been had one way or another. The recession ended shortly after Obama took office, and not because of anything Obama did. Growth would have occurred one way or another. McCain would have had a stimulus package of some sort. Whatever plan of attack McCain took, he would have executed it better because that would have been his priority. He wouldn't have been distracted by a healthcare boondoggle. Economic recovery would have been job 1 for McCain. He wouldn't have spent a year telling America that he knows they care about jobs and he'll definitely get around to focusing on that when he gets done mucking up their insurance.