Paulie
Diamond Member
- May 19, 2007
- 40,769
- 6,387
- 1,830
Absolutely. You've never heard of disturbing the peace?
Rav it takes a hell of a lot to be shut down for that. Simply standing in a spot shouting your protests typically doesn't lead to DTP charges, or even being shut down, other than to maybe be directed to what's considered a "designated area". You have to really start getting out of hand and doing more than just raising the volume of your voice.
Therein lies the parallel. A commercial being a little louder than regular programming is not "disturbing the peace" anymore than shouting some protests in a designated area is.
There's no freedom of speech distinction here. If you are inconvenienced by protestors somewhere, I highly doubt you'd be calling your congressman and asking him to enact legislation to lower the volume of their voices. You'll simply walk away.
So why not simply change the channel or use the remote and adjust the volume?
Why don't you just admit that what you REALLY want is a way to stick it to the big businesses who are inconveniencing you?I probably watch a grand total of 40 hours of tv a year...so it matters not to me. I am merely pointing out that we are "allowed" to regulate what we own.
Maybe we need a Calm Act to keep you under control.![]()
I'm not arguing that we aren't allowed to. I'm arguing that it's a waste of time for Congress to focus on now. Their efforts are needed in important matters like figuring out how to get millions of people off unemployment and welfare and getting them working and improving the economy. Not figuring out how to help someone fall asleep in peace while their TV is on.
And "it matters not to you"?

So little so, that you've devoted a significant amount of attention to every thread on the subject.
