Legal Definition of Slander | UpCounsel 2022.
If the accusation is in public writing, it would be "Libel".
If the accusation is in public writing, it would be "Libel".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
An oath is only relevant for Perjury cases. Law enforcement agencies can trace an internet post to its origin. All they need is a warrant signed by a judge.The anonimity of message boards complicate this, as most all posters are not making their statements under oath or in connection with their real world identities.
Would they truly want to trace down some anonymous poster that said so and so was a traitor? I've seen many message boarders say ridiculous things.An oath is only relevant for Perjury cases. Law enforcement agencies can trace an internet post to its origin. All they need is a warrant signed by a judge.
It rather depends on the victim. If he or she is running for public office or being considered for an important position, they might take action. Most accusations are ignored because the accuser has no money and could not pay a judgement.Would they truly want to trace down some anonymous poster that said so and so was a traitor? I've seen many message boarders say ridiculous things.
What about calling people a fascist or semi-fascist?Legal Definition of Slander | UpCounsel 2022.
If the accusation is in public writing, it would be "Libel".
Not if it's true.Legal Definition of Slander | UpCounsel 2022.
If the accusation is in public writing, it would be "Libel".
Or wasn't serious or even possible.It rather depends on the victim. If he or she is running for public office or being considered for an important position, they might take action. Most accusations are ignored because the accuser has no money and could not pay a judgement.
Defamation is always serious when a man's reputation is harmed. The Washington Post settled such a case for several million recently. Alan Dershowitz, the law professor is suing CNN for $300 millionOr wasn't serious or even possible.
Only if you're a person of value either monetarily or in noteriety. Common folks like me can get slandered and backstabbed all the way to kingdom come and politibitches aint gonna stop a thing.Defamation is always serious when a man's reputation is harmed. The Washington Post settled such a case for several million recently. Alan Dershowitz, the law professor is suing CNN for $300 million
Only if you're a person of value either monetarily or in noteriety. Common folks like me can get slandered and backstabbed all the way to kingdom come and politibitches aint gonna stop a thing.
IGNOREThey're not into fixing problems with permanent solutions, they want an endless churning that fits into a word game thats why theyre called pipple of the o fice
I aint gonna argue. I want swift action not blah blah blah
In order to be a traitor, we must be at war with someone.Not if it's true.
EXACTLY. The Rosenbergs were executed for giving nuclear secrets to the USSR, but the charge was Espionage, not Treason.In order to be a traitor, we must be at war with someone.
What if someone gave "aid and comfort" to 5 enemy terrorist leaders during "The war on terror"? Would that not make them a traitor?Legal Definition of Slander | UpCounsel 2022.
If the accusation is in public writing, it would be "Libel".
I'm not sure. That would not be a declared war. The court would decide.What if someone gave "aid and comfort" to 5 enemy terrorist leaders during "The war on terror"? Would that not make them a traitor?