Calling all boomers

Belgrade A-Team

The Serbs were fighting the Bosnian branch of Al Qaeda. There's no such thing as an "atrocity" against that existential threat to civilization. Previously, the Serbs had stood up to the Turkish jihad, Austrian aggression, Naziism, and Stalinism.
Correct, it was Bill Clinton who with that Islamist terrorist Izetbegovic who enabled thousands of Jihadis from all over the World to fight against the Serbs in Bosnia same thing in Kosovo they were head choppers, now let me think where have i seen that recently?
 
Correct, it was Bill Clinton who with that Islamist terrorist Izetbegovic who enabled thousands of Jihadis from all over the World to fight against the Serbs in Bosnia same thing in Kosovo they were head choppers, now let me think where have i seen that recently?
Serbs were taking whole families to stadiums killing every man woman and child.

Please dont sit here and say how Serbs were wronged. Its BS
 
The legacy of Islamo-vermin invasions last long after the original invasions, hundreds of years. Can't work up any pity party for Muslims in the Balkans; their heroes the Ottomans set the standards there. They would take the first born sons of non-Muslims and send them to Turkey as children, and raise them to slaughter Christians. Good riddance; they reaped what they themselves sowed.
 
Correct, it was Bill Clinton who with that Islamist terrorist Izetbegovic who enabled thousands of Jihadis from all over the World to fight against the Serbs in Bosnia same thing in Kosovo they were head choppers, now let me think where have i seen that recently?
New Europe's Ingratitude

Brave Serbian scouts played a key role in this victory against the Religion of Cain:

BATTLE OF ZENTA, September 11, 1697


WHITES: 50,000 men, 60 cannon
NAZISLAMIS: 100,000 humanoids, 200 cannon

EUROPE'S FINEST: 429 Martyrs
MUSLIME: 30,000 dead dirtbags
 
You can't recognize lies and propaganda when you see it that's your problem, you need to check out a Bosnian Muslim called Nasser Oric if you want to see what real atrcities and war crimes look like.

Calling up the actions of one individual do not negate the actions of others.

That is like calling out the history of the Soviet Union and how they treated Poles and Jews, and going "But Hitler did it!".
 
Calling up the actions of one individual do not negate the actions of others.

That is like calling out the history of the Soviet Union and how they treated Poles and Jews, and going "But Hitler did it!".
I am just giving you the other side instead of the Serbs are like Hitler and responsible for the Balkan wars, the Serbs suffered more than any from the Nazis and their Croatian and Muslim puppets at the time.
 
I am just giving you the other side

No, you are doing what you always do. Attempting to spin things in ways that you think favor your beliefs. But most times, in a grossly inept way that does nothing but show how incredibly biased you are.

Ultimately, the problem with Yugoslavia is that it was a forced together nation, with several groups that honestly simply did not like each other. During the entire reign of Marshal Tito, he fought against that. I have actually long viewed him as one of the "Good Communists, much as I viewed Generalisimo Francisco Franco as one of the "Good Fascists". Neither one stood for that ethnic crap, and would slam people of their own ethnic group for oppressing others as much as anybody else. Be a Croat oppressing Serbians, he would come down just as hard as a Serbian oppressing Croats. The same with Franco, he saw everybody as "Spanish", and did not care if you were Castilian or Basque.

But you are typical of the "Bad Communists". You seem to support those who do oppressing, just so long as they are "your guys" doing it.
 
Ultimately, the problem with Yugoslavia is that it was a forced together nation, with several groups that honestly simply did not like each other. During the entire reign of Marshal Tito, he fought against that. I have actually long viewed him as one of the "Good Communists, much as I viewed Generalisimo Francisco Franco as one of the "Good Fascists".

Yes. Tito was the best of a bad lot, even scared Stalin enough to make him back off.

 
Tito was Croatian, which surprised me, as I had always assumed he was Hungarian or something for some reason. There was a substantial anti-Nazi underground in the Balkans and elsewhere, supplied by the Brits.

AI Overview
Learn more

During World War II, the British government, primarily under Prime Minister Winston Churchill, significantly supported Josip Broz Tito and his Yugoslav Partisan resistance movement against the Axis forces in Yugoslavia, eventually switching their backing from the initially favored Chetnik leader Draža Mihailović to Tito after recognizing the Partisans' greater effectiveness in combatting the German occupation; this shift in support was solidified at the Tehran Conference in 1943.

see also ...


Croats had the best organization and effectiveness.


The Brits armed and supported over 800,000 partisans behind German lines just in Yugoslavia, quite an impressive operational and intelligence capacity. Also in Italy, Greece, etc.
 
Back
Top Bottom