Zone1 Calling/accusing other members "groomer"

[Dogmaphobe]

You seem very angry and disappointed. I am sure there is another board where you can accuse other posters of being Pedos to your heart's content. 8Chan perhaps?

I'm angry, like any person who had been molested as a child would be watching you dishonest clowns doing everything in your power to support it.

You keep claiming I'm calling people pedos, yet I have never come as close to as direct an accusation as the malignant narcissist has done with me.

 

[BlackSand]

.

"It is not what one is called that really makes a difference ... However ... What they answer to can make all the difference in the world."

.​

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Give it up. You've decided enabling is against rules also

Grab a Merriam and look up enabling.

You tripped all all over yourself

Leave children alone

I used to think Aye was a good person.

I didn't realize she is as treacherous as she is. She has totally betrayed what she said she was going to do.

 

[Road Runner]

We should not be accusing each other of crimes punishable by law on an open forum on a message board or anywhere else.

Even with proof?

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Yet it was posted on the open board and commented about…yet Miraculously all other mods somehow missed it. Shocking.

It's always a case of rules for thee but not for me, here.

They think they are Gods and react like them, too.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I used to think Aye was a good person.

I didn't realize she is as treacherous as she is. She has totally betrayed what she said she was going to do.

Some wood hound got to her

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Iv’e been here through 3 different owners. You think your dumb ass is going to run me off? Not hardly.

Damn, it seems like he was here for all of a couple of weeks and they made him a moderator.

It certainly wasn't for his intellect.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I'm angry, like any person who had been molested as a child would be watching you dishonest clowns doing everything in your power to support it.

You keep claiming I'm calling people pedos, yet I have never come as close to as direct an accusation as the malignant narcissist has done with me.

Well...bye...

 

[BlueGin]

Damn, it seems like he was here for all of a couple of weeks and they made him a moderator.

It certainly wasn't for his intellect.

They were probably palsies off board. That’s usually how it works.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Some wood hound got to her

Malignant narcissists have powers of manipulation unlike any other.

 

[Coyote]

I havent been promoting it. I have said that it might be a useful tool in age appropriate settings.
Its aimed at teenagers and young adults. That seems fine to me.
You see this is where your witch burning persona takes over. You lack basic integrity and twist anything that is said to fit your diseased mind.
You accused me of supporting rape gangs but have never provided any evidence. you are just low grade trash.
View attachment 754222

And this is an example of what SHOULD be discussed but can’t because someone will be accused of being a pedo.

There was a start at DISCUSSION, but we all got side tracked.

Gender Queer, the book causing the most dispute, recommended ages 12-18.

Without having actually read it, going by what is on the internet it is extremely graphically illustrated (comic book style) and with a lot of explicit language.

Is this a suitable for school libraries?
For 12 yr olds? (12 to 18 is a huge age range in terms of development)
What literary or educational does it have?
How do parents feel about it?
If kids are already exposed to this sort of stuff via the internet, then does it matter?
Are there other books that tackle the issues facing non straight teens in amore thoughtful and less graphic manner that could be provided instead?

These are things that SHOULD be discussed but CAN’T be discussed attempting to do so leads to accusations of pedo and grooming that derail or inhibit any conversation.

 

[BlueGin]

And this is an example of what SHOULD be discussed but can’t because someone will be accused of being a pedo.

There was a start at DISCUSSION, but we all got side tracked.

Gender Queer, the book causing the most dispute, recommended ages 12-18.

Without having actually read it, going by what is on the internet it is extremely graphically illustrated (comic book style) and with a lot of explicit language.

Is this a suitable for school libraries?
For 12 yr olds? (12 to 18 is a huge age range in terms of development)
What literary or educational does it have?
How do parents feel about it?
If kids are already exposed to this sort of stuff via the internet, then does it matter?
Are there other books that tackle the issues facing non straight teens in amore thoughtful and less graphic manner that could be provided instead?

These are things that SHOULD be discussed but CAN’T be discussed attempting to do so leads to accusations of pedo and grooming that derail or inhibit any conversation.

And the blame for ending discussions are the mods trying to control speech.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Malignant narcissists have powers of manipulation unlike any other.

I don't give a crap who somebody thinks they are.... you go after a child,? That's a problem

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Gender Queer contains illustrations of graphic child sex that would be ILLEGAL if they were real boys and not just illustrations of boys.

 

[Road Runner]

I'm actually rather surprised that this thread is still open lol I was sure by last night it would be closed after we all started saying that this policy is bull since it's all about censorship and protection. Not about whether or not we can call people pedophiles as it's gone WAY past that point for me.

 

[Fueri]

That's not what's happening. Your not some super sleuth exposing evil doers. You're just insulting people who disagree with you.

Spare us the faux outrage over insulting people. Completely ridiculous coming from you. You have zero legs to stand when it comes to that.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

They were probably palsies off board. That’s usually how it works.

He, Aye and Coyote got together and created a little play land, the content of which to be controlled through systematic censorship.

 

[BlackSand]

And this is an example of what SHOULD be discussed but can’t because someone will be accused of being a pedo.

There was a start at DISCUSSION, but we all got side tracked.

Gender Queer, the book causing the most dispute, recommended ages 12-18.

Without having actually read it, going by what is on the internet it is extremely graphically illustrated (comic book style) and with a lot of explicit language.

Is this a suitable for school libraries?
For 12 yr olds? (12 to 18 is a huge age range in terms of development)
What literary or educational does it have?
How do parents feel about it?
If kids are already exposed to this sort of stuff via the internet, then does it matter?
Are there other books that tackle the issues facing non straight teens in amore thoughtful and less graphic manner that could be provided instead?

These are things that SHOULD be discussed but CAN’T be discussed attempting to do so leads to accusations of pedo and grooming that derail or inhibit any conversation.

.

Set the Rules ... Set the Narrative ... Tell everyone what they should be thinking ... And Bam ...
You got it made ... Turn it from a Discussion Board into an Echo Chamber ... Easy to Police anyways ...

.​

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Spare us the faux outrage over insulting people. Completely ridiculous coming from you. You have zero legs to stand when it comes to that.

He is often the very WORST behaved poster in these sorts of threads.

 

[BlueGin]

He, Aye and Coyote got together and created a little play land, the content of which to be controlled through systematic censorship.

Sounds like it.