California: State of Insurrection

Really? Trump is a convicted felon tyrant threatening public officials such as Newsom because he doesn't like the way they govern.

We know you're nothing but a fool for Trump so let's see how you like living under a deranged sociopathic tyrant who became an autocrat because of MAGA jerkoffs like you.

Now come back with your usual laughing emoji, halfwit.
I’m loving life. Sux to be such a loser Dimwinger, huh Clipper ?

:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: :banana:
 
Really? Trump is a convicted felon tyrant threatening public officials such as Newsom because he doesn't like the way they govern.

We know you're nothing but a fool for Trump so let's see how you like living under a deranged sociopathic tyrant who became an autocrat because of MAGA jerkoffs like you.

Now come back with your usual laughing emoji, halfwit.
source.gif
 
Civil Disobediance is where the Public protests against bad government actions. And trust me, The Orange Cheeto has really out did himself on this one.
This is NOT civil disobedience. What Rosa Parks did on the bus was civil disobedience.

Even still, for it to be civil disobedience, it needs to be civil.
 
When a President is tacitly allowed by Congress to misuse his powers then it's not only our Duty but our Responsibility to have civil disobedients.
Ah. So elect people to that same congress to limit the powers you think the president is abusing. Don't riot in the streets like toddlers in a daycare.
 
Like Seattle, once the Orange Cheeto is run off, LA will slowly return to peace. Your Orange Cheeto is out of control. Look for the courts to slap his silly ass down.
Seattle will likely be another hotbed of these riots. Look for Trump to bring them under heel like he has LA.
 
This is the most boring riot I've ever seen. Come on California, y'all can do better than this.
 
This is NOT civil disobedience. What Rosa Parks did on the bus was civil disobedience.

Even still, for it to be civil disobedience, it needs to be civil.

Here's the thing, Twinkie. We didn't get Civil Rights because Rosa refused to move her seat.

We got them because black people were threatening to burn the country down.

Same thing happened in 1992 and 2020. If you want to get white people off their fat compliant asses to right racial wrongs in this country, you got to threaten to burn their stuff.
 
Here's the thing, Twinkie. We didn't get Civil Rights because Rosa refused to move her seat.

We got them because black people were threatening to burn the country down.

Same thing happened in 1992 and 2020. If you want to get white people off their fat compliant asses to right racial wrongs in this country, you got to threaten to burn their stuff.
Had they rioted against Obama, who did exactly what Trump is doing, you would be saying the exact opposite. If leftists couldn't be hypocrites they'd be nothing.
 
Had they rioted against Obama, who did exactly what Trump is doing, you would be saying the exact opposite. If leftists couldn't be hypocrites they'd be nothing.

The point is, they didn't riot against Obama, because Obama didn't escalate bad situations. My opinon, he didn't do enough to prosecute racist killers like Zimmerman or Wilson (who should have gotten slapped with Federal Charges when the State fell down on the job.) But he didn't make things worse like Trump did.

Obama also didn't send in the NG to go around shooting at Teabaggers, as amusing as that would have been
 
Here's the thing, Twinkie. We didn't get Civil Rights because Rosa refused to move her seat.

We got them because black people were threatening to burn the country down.

Same thing happened in 1992 and 2020. If you want to get white people off their fat compliant asses to right racial wrongs in this country, you got to threaten to burn their stuff.
1749640285918.webp
 
Had they rioted against Obama, who did exactly what Trump is doing, you would be saying the exact opposite. If leftists couldn't be hypocrites they'd be nothing.

One problem. Obama never called out Federal Military to show force to civilians. You can't even get your own lie to work for you.
 
Nixon emancipated the slaves? Seriously, WTF?
The timeline of slavery in the USA is well documented.

First Lincoln emancipated the slaves. Then Woodrow Wilson reinstituted slavery in America in 1917-1918.

Then the biggest, most infamous, most evil, most brutal slavedriver in American history, FDR, reinstituted slavery in 1940. Slavery expired briefly in 1947 and then another Democrat, Harry Truman reinstituted slavery again in 1948.

Nixon ran on a platform of ending LBJ's war and emancipating the slaves. And he kept those campaign promises.

Mission Accomplished.

But we must still be vigilant against the Democratic party of slavery, racism and authoritarianism. Every once in a while the Democrats still dip thier rotten evil toes into the slavery pool, checking the water to see if it's safe for slavery again.

The latest example was when Charlie Rangle (good riddance) introduced a bill in 2013 to reinstitute slavery in the USA. It was rejected but the Democratic party of slavery was definitely putting out the slavery feelers again. Testing public reaction.
 
Back
Top Bottom