California: Progressive Paradise

[danielpalos]

Our Constitution is our example of where our form of socialism, starts.

Poor Daniel is someone who doesn’t understand socialism or the U.S. Constitution.

lol. says the guys who have Nothing, but fallacy and are not embarrassed, some women are more conservative.

 

[P@triot]

The Fed is not mentioned in COTUS

Bingo! Making it what? Unconstitutional!

and Congress does not command fiscal policy, it (in normal times*) requires the H. or Rep. to pass a bill, to be vetted by the Senate, and then signed by the President.

* Every year that is until Trump became President and McConnell and Ryan abdicated their duty.

That is a comical quote coming from the dillhole who celebrated the fact that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never passed a single budget during their reign of terror.

 

[P@triot]

the right wing has a problem with, consistency.

And the left wing has a problem with ethics and honesty.

lol. just right wing propaganda on Sunday, like usual for the Right Wing.

Every time someone hits you with facts, you cry “right-wing propaganda”. Yawn.

 

[Thinker101]

the right wing has a problem with, consistency.

And the left wing has a problem with ethics and honesty.

lol. just right wing propaganda on Sunday, like usual for the Right Wing.

Let me guess, everything you hear that doesn't fit the left wing agenda is propaganda....dumbass.

 

[P@triot]

lol. says the guys who have Nothing, but fallacy and are not embarrassed, some women are more conservative.

Still failing to properly capitalize letters, still capitalizing letters that shouldn’t be, still placing commas where they don’t belong.

 

[danielpalos]

The Fed is not mentioned in COTUS

Bingo! Making it what? Unconstitutional!

and Congress does not command fiscal policy, it (in normal times*) requires the H. or Rep. to pass a bill, to be vetted by the Senate, and then signed by the President.

* Every year that is until Trump became President and McConnell and Ryan abdicated their duty.

That is a comical quote coming from the dillhole who celebrated the fact that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid never passed a single budget during their reign of terror.

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

 

[danielpalos]

the right wing has a problem with, consistency.

And the left wing has a problem with ethics and honesty.

lol. just right wing propaganda on Sunday, like usual for the Right Wing.

Every time someone hits you with facts, you cry “right-wing propaganda”. Yawn.

you have no facts, but decry any declamation of that fact.

 

[P@triot]

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

You were found to be both mentally incompetent and mentally inept.

Something being “necessary” (by your idiotic standards) and/or “proper” (by your idiotic standards) are not grounds for existing at the federal level. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricted the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and also explicitly stated that anything beyond those 18 enumerated powers were reserved for the states and the people.

 

[danielpalos]

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

You were found to be both mentally incompetent and mentally inept.

Something being “necessary” (by your idiotic standards) and/or “proper” (by your idiotic standards) are not grounds for existing at the federal level. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricted the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and also explicitly stated that anything beyond those 18 enumerated powers were reserved for the states and the people.

Yes, they are; a central bank helps promote and provide for the general welfare.

 

[hanio]

California is awesome.

 

[P@triot]

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

You were found to be both mentally incompetent and mentally inept.

Something being “necessary” (by your idiotic standards) and/or “proper” (by your idiotic standards) are not grounds for existing at the federal level. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricted the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and also explicitly stated that anything beyond those 18 enumerated powers were reserved for the states and the people.

Yes, they are; a central bank helps promote and provide for the general welfare.

That’s not one of the 18 enumerated powers, snowflake. You’re a prime example nobody takes the left seriously about anything.

 

[danielpalos]

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

You were found to be both mentally incompetent and mentally inept.

Something being “necessary” (by your idiotic standards) and/or “proper” (by your idiotic standards) are not grounds for existing at the federal level. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricted the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and also explicitly stated that anything beyond those 18 enumerated powers were reserved for the states and the people.

Yes, they are; a central bank helps promote and provide for the general welfare.

That’s not one of the 18 enumerated powers, snowflake. You’re a prime example nobody takes the left seriously about anything.

providing for the general welfare is a general power; and, a central bank was found to be, necessary and proper to achieve that end.

 

[P@triot]

providing for the general welfare is a general power; and, a central bank was found to be, necessary and proper to achieve that end.

Thankfully the founders didn’t grant the federal government unlimited “general powers”. They restricted them to 18 specific powers. Both the 10th Amendment and Thomas Jefferson trump your nonsense and propaganda.

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

 

[Tax Man]

The Fed was found to be, both monetarily necessary and monetarily proper.

You were found to be both mentally incompetent and mentally inept.

Something being “necessary” (by your idiotic standards) and/or “proper” (by your idiotic standards) are not grounds for existing at the federal level. The U.S. Constitution explicitly restricted the federal government to 18 enumerated powers and also explicitly stated that anything beyond those 18 enumerated powers were reserved for the states and the people.

Yes, they are; a central bank helps promote and provide for the general welfare.

That’s not one of the 18 enumerated powers, snowflake. You’re a prime example nobody takes the left seriously about anything.

You are funny! No one takes your shit as serious information even when it is correct.

 

[danielpalos]

providing for the general welfare is a general power; and, a central bank was found to be, necessary and proper to achieve that end.

Thankfully the founders didn’t grant the federal government unlimited “general powers”. They restricted them to 18 specific powers. Both the 10th Amendment and Thomas Jefferson trump your nonsense and propaganda.

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

lol. whenever shall the right wing be able to bear, true witness to their own, republican doctrine.

 

[P@triot]

No one takes your shit as serious information even when it is correct.

Spoken like a true left-winger! We appreciate the rare moment of honesty.

 

[P@triot]

providing for the general welfare is a general power; and, a central bank was found to be, necessary and proper to achieve that end.

Thankfully the founders didn’t grant the federal government unlimited “general powers”. They restricted them to 18 specific powers. Both the 10th Amendment and Thomas Jefferson trump your nonsense and propaganda.

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

lol. whenever shall the right wing be able to bear, true witness to their own, republican doctrine.

We do. Everyday. Small, limited government. If you want to expand it - you'll have to get the votes to amend the U.S. Constitution. Good luck.

 

[danielpalos]

providing for the general welfare is a general power; and, a central bank was found to be, necessary and proper to achieve that end.

Thankfully the founders didn’t grant the federal government unlimited “general powers”. They restricted them to 18 specific powers. Both the 10th Amendment and Thomas Jefferson trump your nonsense and propaganda.

“Congress had not unlimited powers to provide for the general welfare, but were restrained to those specifically enumerated; and that, as it was never meant they should provide for that welfare but by the exercise of the enumerated powers, so it could not have been meant they should raise money for purposes which the enumeration did not place under their action” - Thomas Jefferson (June 6, 1817)

lol. whenever shall the right wing be able to bear, true witness to their own, republican doctrine.

We do. Everyday. Small, limited government. If you want to expand it - you'll have to get the votes to amend the U.S. Constitution. Good luck.

the power to provide for the general welfare is general, not major, specific, or common under our common law.

 

[P@triot]

the power to provide for the general welfare is general, not major, specific, or common under our common law.

The “power” to “provide for the general welfare” is explicitly limited to the confines of the 18 enumerated powers. If it wasn’t, the federal government could easily decide that it is in the best interest of the “general welfare” to execute all progressives, jackhole.

 

[danielpalos]

the power to provide for the general welfare is general, not major, specific, or common under our common law.

The “power” to “provide for the general welfare” is explicitly limited to the confines of the 18 enumerated powers. If it wasn’t, the federal government could easily decide that it is in the best interest of the “general welfare” to execute all progressives, jackhole.

where does it say that, in our federal Constitution?