Avorysuds
Gold Member
The Acela doesn't stop every 12 miles, only major cities
It is a very profitable run and is usually full
I did a very quick google just to see. I don't know crap about this stuff, it was purely curiosity.
I did "is Acela profitable?"
So it looks like it's not even close.
Is the Northeast Corridor really profitable? - Fred Frailey - Trains Magazine - Online Community: Forums and Blogs
But in that Washington Post story, Boardman qualifies his statement in one important respect. To cover the Northeast Corridor’s capital costs, Amtrak still needs a government subsidy, he says. That is correct. How much are capital costs, on average? For the answer to that, go back to that same link and refer to page 4 of the 2009 report titled, “Northeast Corridor State of Good Repair Spend Plan.” There, it estimates the NEC’s annual, normalized capital needs the next 15 years as $368 million for infrastructure and equipment. Last fiscal year’s NEC operating profit of $61 million covers only one-sixth of that capital need.
The Acela operates on a profit of $41 a passenger, the rest of the trains on the NEC lose money.
Amtrak Loses $32 Per Passenger - Business Insider
The NEC corridor, like most US infrastructure, has been sadly neglected. The trains are old and much rail support electronics are ancient. Rails, stations, crossings, bridges, tunnels all need work
The price of a ticket will not make up for 60 years of neglect
What I don't agree with is, that sure, if you take a single area and find it makes a profit but discount the rest of the system that runs a huge deficit then it's not really honest. If updates were done that negative 32$ number would actually be much higher, even if you got more people to use the trains.
IÂ’d love to see more trains, and like most people have thought about how could you make it work, I just never can make it and if anything I see how pointless it would be to have them.
I'd like to see trains get better but this bullet train crap just boggles the mind.