Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Remember. You're a liberal so it's assumed you're a fraud and a liar.Not a problem. Remember, I'm a liberal, so I can alwaqys back up what I say. And yes, I understand how foreign that concept is to conservatives.
Let's start with this one.
A hardline conservative set out to assassinate Nancy Pelosi, and ended up bashing her husband's head in.
Charlie Kirk joked about it and declared that the assassin-wannabee needed the help of true patriots.
That is, Charlie Kirk endorsed assassinating Democrats.
Do you agree with his position there?
Now, if you want to just imply that you endorse assassinating Democrats, without openly saying that you endorse assassinating Demcorats, do what the other Trump cultists do, and invoke some weirdass cosnpiracy about a gay lover that no one actually believes.
That was quite the sidestep. You're reduced to frantic conspiracy theories.How do you function in the real world, given the degree of your brainwashing?
Oh, that's right. Trump cultist. You're too scared to leave the echo chamber. You might meet a minority person.
so they prove they are fascist by being fascist. can't make it up.I need only to see the words, "California democrats" to expect the very worst. They never disappoint.
While it could have been an opportunity for democrats to show they're not completely and utterly beyond reasoning with, they decided instead to show they're completely and utterly beyond reasoning with.
They hurled the expected " fascist" slogan which is curious because the loathsome democrats have never identified any "fascist" element of Charlie Kirk's presentation.
For democrats, it's all about their twisted politico- religious ideology of hate, self-hate and exclusion.
![]()
California Democrat Branch Rejects GOP Invite to Charlie Kirk Vigil Because He Was 'Fascist'
The Stanislaus County, California, Democratic Party rejected an invitation to a vigil because it said Charlie Kirk was a "fascist."www.breitbart.com
The Stanislaus County, California, Democratic Party rejected an invitation from the local Republican Party to attend a vigil Friday honoring the memory of Charlie Kirk because, its leader explained, Charlie Kirk was a “fascist.”
True that, which is why all Democrats support free speech.Liberals are fans of free speech. That is the basic position for them.
look over there, where? there!So how do all you plan to unradicalize all those very violent conservative bois, given that you all spent so many years radicalizing them into killing?
The monster that you created broke free of your control. How will you get your monster back under control?
except when they never have.True that, which is why all Democrats support free speech.
banning?In contrast, the Republicans have been literally proposing laws banning any criticism of Republicans, and they've been making threats against people who tell the truth, trying to cancel anyone who dares point out that Kirk was kind of an awful person. The right is currently on a jihad against free speech.
that you will never have.As usual, moral high ground to the left here.
I notice no condemnation of Pelosi's would-be assassin, just a lot of frantic deflection.Remember. You're a liberal so it's assumed you're a fraud and a liar.
True that, which is why all Democrats support free speech.
In contrast, the Republicans have been literally proposing laws banning any criticism of Republicans, and they've been making threats against people who tell the truth, trying to cancel anyone who dares point out that Kirk was kind of an awful person. The right is currently on a jihad against free speech.
As usual, moral high ground to the left here.
Again, never a problem, because I'm a liberal.banning?![]()
reason.com
Ummm darlin' it was was Democrats who were pressuring social media to exclude conservative voices from social media site such as Facebook. There were public hearings on this. Were you still comatose when those took place?True that, which is why all Democrats support free speech.
In contrast, the Republicans have been literally proposing laws banning any criticism of Republicans, and they've been making threats against people who tell the truth, trying to cancel anyone who dares point out that Kirk was kind of an awful person. The right is currently on a jihad against free speech.
As usual, moral high ground to the left here.
That's exactly the kind of talk that radicalized the kid and got Kirk murdered. In his mind, Kirk was a progressive statist.Many modern democrats are not liberals. they are progressive statists.
his lover, I just posted it. you need the screenshot tooI notice no condemnation of Pelosi's would-be assassin, just a lot of frantic deflection.
except that hasn't happened, only republicans, and I've already posted that list as wellSo yes, we definitely put you in the "supports assassinating Democrats" column.
you need to look up that word renounce, it isn't what you think it is.Notice the pattern? The left instantly renounces any and all violence, regardless of the victim's politics, while the right is thrilled with violence against Democrats.
Again, never a problem, because I'm a liberal.
![]()
GOP rep proposes canceling people over mean posts about Charlie Kirk
Louisiana Rep. Clay Higgins, who once opposed government jawboning, now says people should be banned from social media and public life over their posts.reason.com
I understand why you didn't know about that. The cult didn't tell you, so how could you know?
So, do you support banning any speech that says mean things about Charlie Kirk?
That's exactly the kind of talk that radicalized the kid and got Kirk murdered. In his mind, Kirk was a progressive statist.
And you won't stop. You can't stop.
Ummm darlin' it was was Democrats who were pressuring social media to exclude conservative voices from social media site such as Facebook. There were public hearings on this. Were you still comatose when those took place?
"Republicans have been literally proposing laws banning any criticism of Republicans"
You really are a moron. Show us those proposed laws.
Why would I condemn Pelosi's attacker? Pelosi brought that on himself because he was a fascist.I notice no condemnation of Pelosi's would-be assassin, just a lot of frantic deflection.
So yes, we definitely put you in the "supports assassinating Democrats" column.
Notice the pattern? The left instantly renounces any and all violence, regardless of the victim's politics, while the right is thrilled with violence against Democrats.
Why would I condemn Pelosi's attacker? Pelosi brought that on himself because he was a fascist.
so never any links I know.Again, never a problem, because I'm a liberal.
accept that never has happened, it did under xiden ask zuckerbutt.![]()
GOP rep proposes canceling people over mean posts about Charlie Kirk
Louisiana Rep. Clay Higgins, who once opposed government jawboning, now says people should be banned from social media and public life over their posts.reason.com
I understand why you didn't know about that. The cult didn't tell you, so how could you know?
I don't support any banning of anything.So, do you support banning any speech that says mean things about Charlie Kirk?
dude, look at the fear in his eyes, the drink in the hand is pricelessAnd likely bisexual. In underwear is the first clue
So sad. Rather than toning things down, they are doubling down.The Stanislaus County, California, Democratic Party rejected an invitation from the local Republican Party to attend a vigil Friday honoring the memory of Charlie Kirk because, its leader explained, Charlie Kirk was a “fascist.”