You know, the truth is, I don't believe Sherrod is a racist. At least not now. Twenty four years ago, based on her own words, I'd have to say that yes, back then she was. Certainly her own description of her actions indicate a certain level of bigotry, regardless of the outcome of the farmers case. This cannot be denied. But is she a bigot today? I seriously doubt it.
Do I believe she should have been forced to resign? Not especially. Certainly not without the powers that be taking a serious look at her track record. From what I've been able to glean from news reports today, based on Sherrod's comments regarding her resignation, she was forced to resign because of fear. Fear in the administration about how it looks. According to one report, Sherrod says she was told to resign because her comments would "be on Beck tomorrow." One should never allow fear to dictate their reactions to incidents such as this. By all accounts this woman was good at her job and there have been no complaints of bias during her tenure at the USDA, and therefore no reason for Vilsack to invoke their "zero tolerance" policy.
The real issue in the story, in my opinion and apparently important to Benjamin Jealous, is the reaction of those in attendence. Members of the NAACP. An organization that recently voted to label the Tea Party as "racist." It seems as if some in attendence reacted in a positive fashion to Sherrod's tale of not using her "full force" to help a white farmer. This type of reaction can be construed in no other way than bigoted.
Do I believe the NACCP is a racist organization? No. But I also do not believe that the Tea Party is a racist organization. Are there racist in the Tea Party? Without a doubt, yes. Are there racists in the NAACP? Without a doubt, yes. But the same can be said of any group with a large membership roll. The Democrat party, the Republican party, the NAACP, the Tea Party, the YMCA, AAA, take your pick. You'll find racism and bigotry everywhere. That doesn't mean everyone in a particular group is bad...