Isn't that just selective recognition? And because subjective opinions and news reports lies then how can we trust those figures? Let's say half of those are mistakes as we are only as good as info feed us right CNN lacky? The others being word play narrative changes by opposition claiming a lie through their lie, others being misspeaks, exagerations and then actual lies selected from the Billions of possible mistakes or misspeaks or missinformation or lies that's a damn low percentage to selectively point to and then lie to us by calling them lies and making like it's a large percentage when you yourselves complain he tweets and talks to much= more chances to slip up and be counted.
In conclusion you needed to lie to report about lying, you deflected your own higher percentage lying as wrong without seeing your bigger problem and lack of admission, and then you proved your party doesn't understand simple illusions like selective recognition, exaggeration in humor,
SUBJECTIVE OPINIONS, word play new narratives used by oropagandists that cause those skewed subjective opinions and it's own deflective nature.
In other words you are revealing the party as
"MORONS".
Post failed-it was written by someone waving his baton in the front of the line of that moron parade.