Butt Hurt Liar-Whiner in Chief Trump Orders Ego Intervention From Oval Office

[saveliberty]

Obsessed with the mocking from the world about his poorly attended inauguration, the narcissist, and delusional liar trump instructed the Park Service to find ways to support his and his administration spokespeople lie about the attendance at his inauguration. The ego inspired intervention presumably will put parks employees on a wild goose chase to find evidence that will put a band-aid on his injured ego.

fox2now.com/2017/01/26/trump-called-park-service-chief-to-complain-about-inauguration-crowd-photos/

Drumplethinskin does.

Adjust your meds, you messed up bodecea really bad.

 

[Iceweasel]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

 

[BluesLegend]

So far the liberal's have stopped Trump from doing...nothing Trump ran over them with a bulldozer his first week. I hereby dub President Trump the Trumpdozer!

Edit: I forgot to say...good job Mr. President!

 

[Coyote]

I'm thinking about the actual personality stuff there - of course I oppose his policies (I am on the left after all), but that's separate from what I'm seeing of his character that is not changing now that he is in office. I find it beyond understanding in a person in that position.

Obama's personality was just as bad, his was better hidden though. Obama was less the extrovert.

I don't think so - he was professional and measured. I'm not saying he was perfect, but when he screwed up - like over the police officer incident at the beginning, he apologized and had the perfect solution - a beer summit. If it had been Trump...would have have apologized for being wrong? Would he have tried to bring both sides together? Or, would he have doubled down on insisting he everyone else was wrong? Very different personalities and styles. Bush as well, though I loathed his policies.

 

[Coyote]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

 

[Iceweasel]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Whoooosh, you really need to slow down when you read. If you even do read.

 

[Weatherman2020]

 

[Weatherman2020]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Dufus.

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

 

[Coyote]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Dufus.

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

Dufus. That study has been discredited

Here Are The Problems With The Trump Team's Voter Fraud Evidence

 

[Iceweasel]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Dufus.

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

Dufus. That study has been discredited

Here Are The Problems With The Trump Team's Voter Fraud Evidence

Yeah, that's a real problem alright. You are using a November 28, 2016 study to discredit a January 26 2017 study.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Dufus.

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

Dufus. That study has been discredited

Here Are The Problems With The Trump Team's Voter Fraud Evidence

Oh boy, NPR. What's next, Media Matters?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

It takes a few seconds to toss a little red meat to the wolves and while they are kept at bay he's moving forward with his campaign promises.

The libs claim there were no illegals votes, so OK, let's investigate. The libs claim his turnout was pathetic, so OK, let's investigate. Why worry if you're confident? Fact is you're getting played.

So it doesn't bother you at all? Is an inaugural crowd that important? Trump's claim of millions of illegals voting has been roundly debunked, on both sides of the aisle and there is no evidence to support it. We didn't see Bush insisting that he won the popular vote did we? Reagan's inaugural turn out was tiny, but did he obsess on it? It's weird and it's weird to obsess on it, and it's weird to continually insist it's truth when it's so blatently shown not to be. We have plenty of problems to deal with that are important.

Dufus.

Hillary Clinton received 800,000 votes from noncitizens, bolsters Trump argument, study finds

Dufus. That study has been discredited

Here Are The Problems With The Trump Team's Voter Fraud Evidence

November 28, 20164:16 PM ET

 

[Eaglewings]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

I agree, I am embarrassed for Trump..he needs a serious intervention soon..

 

[Weatherman2020]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

I agree, I am embarrassed for Trump..he needs a serious intervention soon..

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

I'm thinking about the actual personality stuff there - of course I oppose his policies (I am on the left after all), but that's separate from what I'm seeing of his character that is not changing now that he is in office. I find it beyond understanding in a person in that position.

Obama's personality was just as bad, his was better hidden though. Obama was less the extrovert.

I don't think so - he was professional and measured. I'm not saying he was perfect, but when he screwed up - like over the police officer incident at the beginning, he apologized and had the perfect solution - a beer summit. If it had been Trump...would have have apologized for being wrong? Would he have tried to bring both sides together? Or, would he have doubled down on insisting he everyone else was wrong? Very different personalities and styles. Bush as well, though I loathed his policies.

It wasn't a screw up. He immediately let his racism and hatred of police fly out of his yet unpolished mouth. He even blew the first shot at the beer summit - it was to be him, the other black and the falsely maligned white cop. 2 on 1, then it got changed to add in his alcoholic VP. He stayed on teleprompter pretty much ever since.

There was the Trayvon Martin if I had a son he would look just like him thing. A color blind president would never say such a thing...but a closet racist would.

 

[sartre play]

Stuck, cant move forward over & over the same sad tune. Trump won. fair, kinda fair, not fair at all. don't matter. big crowds small crowds, to many pink hats. NO conversation on policy or political choice, what's best for the nation. too many cry baby's not enough serious thought.

 

[Eaglewings]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

I agree, I am embarrassed for Trump..he needs a serious intervention soon..

View attachment 109026

 

[Coyote]

I'm thinking about the actual personality stuff there - of course I oppose his policies (I am on the left after all), but that's separate from what I'm seeing of his character that is not changing now that he is in office. I find it beyond understanding in a person in that position.

Obama's personality was just as bad, his was better hidden though. Obama was less the extrovert.

I don't think so - he was professional and measured. I'm not saying he was perfect, but when he screwed up - like over the police officer incident at the beginning, he apologized and had the perfect solution - a beer summit. If it had been Trump...would have have apologized for being wrong? Would he have tried to bring both sides together? Or, would he have doubled down on insisting he everyone else was wrong? Very different personalities and styles. Bush as well, though I loathed his policies.

It wasn't a screw up. He immediately let his racism and hatred of police fly out of his yet unpolished mouth. He even blew the first shot at the beer summit - it was to be him, the other black and the falsely maligned white cop. 2 on 1, then it got changed to add in his alcoholic VP. He stayed on teleprompter pretty much ever since.

There was the Trayvon Martin if I had a son he would look just like him thing. A color blind president would never say such a thing...but a closet racist would.

Sure it was a screw up. He did what every first time president has a tendancy to do at the beginning before they realize the consequences of words - shoot off at the mouth. He apologized, the beer summit was a success and no one complained except his critics but when it comes to them, there was nothing he could do right anyway.

So how has Trump handled similar situations? Not very well has he?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Seriously...partisanship aside...isn't anyone a little disturbed that Trump focus on such minutia? Crowd sizes? Not winning the popular vote? How much time, energy, emotion and twittering has he put into it? Is this normal? It's like he's obsessed - he can't handle any criticism or slight without going off the deep end. You can only defend it for so long before it becomes embarressing.

GW Bush's first inaugural attendence was much smaller than Clinton's first - AND Bush did not win the popular vote. The only thing that means is his mandate is a weaker, but he won the election and in the end that is the only race that counts. So did Bush get into media wars over this, did he obsess and call in the National Park Service or other government agencies to bullshit them? Or did he get on with the job?

Doesn't anybody get a little bit concerned as to how Trump's behavior might play out over the next year...two years...four years?

I agree, I am embarrassed for Trump..he needs a serious intervention soon..

View attachment 109026

Trump has you idiots in his pocket. He tweets something and you spend all your time chasing it while he has already fulfilled half of his campaign promises in 5 days.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I'm thinking about the actual personality stuff there - of course I oppose his policies (I am on the left after all), but that's separate from what I'm seeing of his character that is not changing now that he is in office. I find it beyond understanding in a person in that position.

Obama's personality was just as bad, his was better hidden though. Obama was less the extrovert.

I don't think so - he was professional and measured. I'm not saying he was perfect, but when he screwed up - like over the police officer incident at the beginning, he apologized and had the perfect solution - a beer summit. If it had been Trump...would have have apologized for being wrong? Would he have tried to bring both sides together? Or, would he have doubled down on insisting he everyone else was wrong? Very different personalities and styles. Bush as well, though I loathed his policies.

It wasn't a screw up. He immediately let his racism and hatred of police fly out of his yet unpolished mouth. He even blew the first shot at the beer summit - it was to be him, the other black and the falsely maligned white cop. 2 on 1, then it got changed to add in his alcoholic VP. He stayed on teleprompter pretty much ever since.

There was the Trayvon Martin if I had a son he would look just like him thing. A color blind president would never say such a thing...but a closet racist would.

Sure it was a screw up. He did what every first time president has a tendancy to do at the beginning before they realize the consequences of words - shoot off at the mouth. He apologized, the beer summit was a success and no one complained except his critics but when it comes to them, there was nothing he could do right anyway.

So how has Trump handled similar situations? Not very well has he?

Trump called police stupid? When?