But, Trump hates gays? Except for the gay guy he just appointed, making history...

[bodecea]

Former prostitute

The Daily Mail had to come up with several million dollars because they made that accusation and couldn't prove it. How much do you think you will have to come up with?

Oh.....I forgot
She was not a prostitute, she was a “fashion model” for an agency that offered escorts on the side.

What is your evidence for this?

What's past is prologue. Melania used to have degrees in design and architecture. Yes, I know that's an illogical way to say it, but that's the way it is.

She never had degrees. What she does have is a certain skill set that is in high demand in certain circles.

Once again proving that foreigners do the jobs that native Americans won't do.

 

[bodecea]

Trump does nothing for anyone other than Trump. All political theater.

Ahhhh, got it. So talking a good game like your stupid fake Indian arm waving skinnycuuunt is more convincing than someone actually appointing a homo to an actual position that no democrat ever did?

You stupid pathetic ape.

Name-calling....when you've got nothing substantial.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

It is funny the things left wingers have to make up to try to win elections. Trump has had no history of homophobia...but that didn't stop the democrats...they just f*****g made it up.....their democrat hacks in the press repeated it...over and over .....as did their democrat hacks in hollywood..........

Now Trump has done something that guy with the funny name....who was President before Trump....didn't do....

And how many gays did obama have in his cabinet?

You left wingers are such asshats.....

Democrats and Media attack Trump's choice of Richard Grenell for Acting Director of National Intelligence

Richard Grenell made history when President Donald Trump appointed him as the U.S. Ambassador to Germany because he was the first openly gay man to serve at such a high level in an administration.

Grenell made history again on Wednesday night when Trump picked him as his acting Director of National intelligence.

Grenell is the first openly gay person to serve on a president’s Cabinet.

How does being gay qualify him to be DNI?

I thought that status in a minority community Trumped....all experience or lack of experience...isn't that what you asshats keep telling us? So what is the big deal......you guys don't care about qualifications on a normal day, why should you start now....?

That is a whole bunch of inane equine excrement. Trump has demonstrated time and again that he does not care about qualifications, gets rid of those who are competent and who will stand up to him, and hires boot licking lackeys' instead. This is just another example of that:

Trump Sidelined Acting Spy Chief After Russian Meddling Briefing: Reports | HuffPost

President Donald Trump sidelined Joseph Maguire, the outgoing acting director of national intelligence, after learning a member of Maguire’s team had briefed House lawmakers that Russia was attempting to interfere in the 2020 elections to get Trump re-elected, according to multiple reports.

In addition:
Trump’s intel pick will blow up in his face as agencies revolt and leak the truth: Ex-CIA official

Appearing on CNN on Friday morning, former CIA case officer Phil Mudd said the selection of Ambassador Richard Grennell to be the acting Director of National Intelligence will likely blow up in the president’s face because he is not respected within the intelligence community who will seek to undercut him.

 

[martybegan]

I am criticizing you motives, and so far you haven't made me thing anything else of you but hack.

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.

Bring it, *****.

Your motives are the crux of the issue. Trump to me is simply someone who is doing what he said he would do (mostly). Trump to you is the devil, the anti-christ of your SJW replacement religion of progressivism.

If saying it made it so, you'd be the happiest Trumpkin in the patch. You're just a yammering yahoo in cyberspace who doesn't know how to defend leghumping the Chosen One except by attacking others. Does that work in your circle?

Standard pathetic progspeak from a standard pathetic SJW prog soi-boi.

Go fix your man-bun.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Oh, well, if it's just my motives, that's different.

No, it's not. You're a hysterical goof.

Whenever I give thought to my motives, my first question is, "what would Marty think?" You funny.

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.

Bring it, *****.

Your motives are the crux of the issue. Trump to me is simply someone who is doing what he said he would do (mostly). Trump to you is the devil, the anti-christ of your SJW replacement religion of progressivism.

If saying it made it so, you'd be the happiest Trumpkin in the patch. You're just a yammering yahoo in cyberspace who doesn't know how to defend leghumping the Chosen One except by attacking others. Does that work in your circle?

Standard pathetic progspeak from a standard pathetic SJW prog soi-boi.

Go fix your man-bun.

Got your meme phrases down, I see. Good. That's all you have, smallbrain.

 

[Olde Europe]

In fewer than three years, he has exceeded the 8-year records of Clinton and Obama. I'm looking to see how many of their 'acting' appointees were awaiting confirmation - as opposed to those such as Joseph Maguire or Matthew Whitaker - who Trump never nominated for their positions.

All the Acting Heads of Trump's Presidency

You know, besides denying the Senate their advise and consent power, officials working in an acting capacity also lack the stature Senate confirmation bestows, and as such they are fully dependent on Trump. Autocrats like it that way.

On the other hand, if Congress weren't populated by a bunch of useless farts, they would stand up for their powers and simply defund the positions they consider as requiring confirmation but filled with acting officials. Or, they could pass laws detailing the exact rules for appointments in an acting capacity - such as duration, emergencies, or the like. Whining at the sidelines, when, in fact, they've sidelined themselves and are unwilling to stand up to the Orange Clown, is nothing short of contemptible.

Then again, there are some 4,000 political appointments to make, and of them north of 1,200 positions require Senate confirmation. I am not at all certain, "preposterous" even begins to describe that. Having thousands of cronies appointed every four years, and more than a thousand required to put on a tutu and dance before the Senate... how is that not the Sistine Chapel of syndromes of some sort or other?

 

[joaquinmiller]

In fewer than three years, he has exceeded the 8-year records of Clinton and Obama. I'm looking to see how many of their 'acting' appointees were awaiting confirmation - as opposed to those such as Joseph Maguire or Matthew Whitaker - who Trump never nominated for their positions.

All the Acting Heads of Trump's Presidency

You know, besides denying the Senate their advise and consent power, officials working in an acting capacity also lack the stature Senate confirmation bestows, and as such they are fully dependent on Trump. Autocrats like it that way.

On the other hand, if Congress weren't populated by a bunch of useless farts, they would stand up for their powers and simply defund the positions they consider as requiring confirmation but filled with acting officials. Or, they could pass laws detailing the exact rules for appointments in an acting capacity - such as duration, emergencies, or the like. Whining at the sidelines, when, in fact, they've sidelined themselves and are unwilling to stand up to the Orange Clown, is nothing short of contemptible.

Then again, there are some 4,000 political appointments to make, and of them north of 1,200 positions require Senate confirmation. I am not at all certain, "preposterous" even begins to describe that. Having thousands of cronies appointed every four years, and more than a thousand required to put on a tutu and dance before the Senate... how is that not the Sistine Chapel of syndromes of some sort or other?

What would be the optimum number - shepherding a civilian workforce of 2,100,000? I've no idea, but we appear able to vet them, or delay them, on a whim. I don't think workload is a problem. (Nor did you imply it.) The current numbers may be the more-or-less correct ratio of politicians to implement policy, and civil servants to keep it between the ditches.

 

[martybegan]

Being snide just shows you don't want to discuss the issues at hand.

My motives aren't the issue. If it's snide to tell you that, you're way too delicate.

Bring it, *****.

Your motives are the crux of the issue. Trump to me is simply someone who is doing what he said he would do (mostly). Trump to you is the devil, the anti-christ of your SJW replacement religion of progressivism.

If saying it made it so, you'd be the happiest Trumpkin in the patch. You're just a yammering yahoo in cyberspace who doesn't know how to defend leghumping the Chosen One except by attacking others. Does that work in your circle?

Standard pathetic progspeak from a standard pathetic SJW prog soi-boi.

Go fix your man-bun.

Got your meme phrases down, I see. Good. That's all you have, smallbrain.

Better than your prog-speak bleating

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

Trump does nothing for anyone other than Trump. All political theater.

Ahhhh, got it. So talking a good game like your stupid fake Indian arm waving skinnycuuunt is more convincing than someone actually appointing a homo to an actual position that no democrat ever did?

You stupid pathetic ape.

Name-calling....when you've got nothing substantial.

Doesn't that pretty much describe the political system itself?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

What's past is prologue. Melania used to have degrees in design and architecture. Yes, I know that's an illogical way to say it, but that's the way it is.

That doesn't answer the question: What is the evidence that she worked as an escort for this agency?

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

We accept that the allegations about Melania Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them.

And pay 3 million dollars.

Melania Trump and Daily Mail Settle Her Libel Suits

 

[EvilCat Breath]

It is funny the things left wingers have to make up to try to win elections. Trump has had no history of homophobia...but that didn't stop the democrats...they just f*****g made it up.....their democrat hacks in the press repeated it...over and over .....as did their democrat hacks in hollywood..........

Now Trump has done something that guy with the funny name....who was President before Trump....didn't do....

And how many gays did obama have in his cabinet?

You left wingers are such asshats.....

Democrats and Media attack Trump's choice of Richard Grenell for Acting Director of National Intelligence

Richard Grenell made history when President Donald Trump appointed him as the U.S. Ambassador to Germany because he was the first openly gay man to serve at such a high level in an administration.

Grenell made history again on Wednesday night when Trump picked him as his acting Director of National intelligence.

Grenell is the first openly gay person to serve on a president’s Cabinet.

How does being gay qualify him to be DNI?

I thought that status in a minority community Trumped....all experience or lack of experience...isn't that what you asshats keep telling us? So what is the big deal......you guys don't care about qualifications on a normal day, why should you start now....?

That is a whole bunch of inane equine excrement. Trump has demonstrated time and again that he does not care about qualifications, gets rid of those who are competent and who will stand up to him, and hires boot licking lackeys' instead. This is just another example of that:

Trump Sidelined Acting Spy Chief After Russian Meddling Briefing: Reports | HuffPost

President Donald Trump sidelined Joseph Maguire, the outgoing acting director of national intelligence, after learning a member of Maguire’s team had briefed House lawmakers that Russia was attempting to interfere in the 2020 elections to get Trump re-elected, according to multiple reports.

In addition:
Trump’s intel pick will blow up in his face as agencies revolt and leak the truth: Ex-CIA official

Appearing on CNN on Friday morning, former CIA case officer Phil Mudd said the selection of Ambassador Richard Grennell to be the acting Director of National Intelligence will likely blow up in the president’s face because he is not respected within the intelligence community who will seek to undercut him.

Trump sidelined nobody. McGuire had to step down by March 11 by operation of law.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

That doesn't answer the question: What is the evidence that she worked as an escort for this agency?

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

My uninformed opinion is that when dealing with people who have fictitious biographies - or multiple multi-million $ fraud settlements - in their past, their words should be taken with a truckload of salt. Call me crazy.

Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with her website biography and is not a claim she made in any case. The allegation that she worked as an escort was claimed by someone else but has not been proven or verified in any way.

The burden of proof is on the person making the allegation, not Melania. That being the case, it is up to him to prove the allegation that she worked as an escort; it is not up to Melania to answer for the website controversy because of this allegation.

You say "multiple multi-million dollar settlements"; unless there's an unrelated lawsuit I don't know about, these lawsuits pertain to the same allegation: that she worked as an escort. Also, "multiple" is a bit of an exaggeration as I believe there were only two entities sued: the Daily Mail and the blogger whom the Daily Mail was citing.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

In fewer than three years, he has exceeded the 8-year records of Clinton and Obama. I'm looking to see how many of their 'acting' appointees were awaiting confirmation - as opposed to those such as Joseph Maguire or Matthew Whitaker - who Trump never nominated for their positions.

All the Acting Heads of Trump's Presidency

You know, besides denying the Senate their advise and consent power, officials working in an acting capacity also lack the stature Senate confirmation bestows, and as such they are fully dependent on Trump. Autocrats like it that way.

On the other hand, if Congress weren't populated by a bunch of useless farts, they would stand up for their powers and simply defund the positions they consider as requiring confirmation but filled with acting officials. Or, they could pass laws detailing the exact rules for appointments in an acting capacity - such as duration, emergencies, or the like. Whining at the sidelines, when, in fact, they've sidelined themselves and are unwilling to stand up to the Orange Clown, is nothing short of contemptible.

Then again, there are some 4,000 political appointments to make, and of them north of 1,200 positions require Senate confirmation. I am not at all certain, "preposterous" even begins to describe that. Having thousands of cronies appointed every four years, and more than a thousand required to put on a tutu and dance before the Senate... how is that not the Sistine Chapel of syndromes of some sort or other?

While I'm not arguing with any of the above, why is any of that a concern for concentrated capital? Does it not result in little to no representation for the unsubstantial people which was the goal of this system from day 1? (Only white male members of the aristocracy were "divinely" granted the "right" to vote)

The system will not change until enough of us change our behavior as opposed to forever hoping we'll be allowed to choose someone from the pre-selected slate of the aristocracy's egomaniacs.

Perhaps it is we the people who have sidelined ourselves via voting only to couch sit over the term of the "candidate" we voted for, and we're all unwilling to stand up to the system's Orange Clown, who is merely another contemptible charlatan symptomatic of a dysfunctional society. We have no shortage of them to follow Don up with.

Asking, pleading with the system to sort itself out for the good of the people is folly.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

My uninformed opinion is that when dealing with people who have fictitious biographies - or multiple multi-million $ fraud settlements - in their past, their words should be taken with a truckload of salt. Call me crazy.

Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with her website biography and is not a claim she made in any case. The allegation that she worked as an escort was claimed by someone else but has not been proven or verified in any way.

The burden of proof is on the person making the allegation, not Melania. That being the case, it is up to him to prove the allegation that she worked as an escort; it is not up to Melania to answer for the website controversy because of this allegation.

You say "multiple multi-million dollar settlements"; unless there's an unrelated lawsuit I don't know about, these lawsuits pertain to the same allegation: that she worked as an escort. Also, "multiple" is a bit of an exaggeration as I believe there were only two entities sued: the Daily Mail and the blogger whom the Daily Mail was citing.

Trump's shit never requires proof.

New day pard, hear it, it's true, welcome to The Reality America Show. Maybe Don's own shyte got turned on him. Who knows, who ever will?

That's the point, on to the next scandal, fast as ya can, resolve nothing.

I saw somewhere she's the nicest piece of plastic surgery work we've seen in that coveted I-fock-the-president position historically. But I've not looked into that personally so I won't state it as fact.

 

[Bo Didleysquat]

That doesn't answer the question: What is the evidence that she worked as an escort for this agency?

I have no evidence as to that. Why would I? I've never hired an escort.

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

We accept that the allegations about Melania Trump are not true and we retract and withdraw them.

And pay 3 million dollars.

Melania Trump and Daily Mail Settle Her Libel Suits

When are the Trumps not suing someone? Or being sued, it's what these people do all the time, are you that unaware?

 

[Olde Europe]

What would be the optimum number - shepherding a civilian workforce of 2,100,000? I've no idea, but we appear able to vet them, or delay them, on a whim. I don't think workload is a problem. (Nor did you imply it.) The current numbers may be the more-or-less correct ratio of politicians to implement policy, and civil servants to keep it between the ditches.

I was rather thinking of 15 department heads (secretaries) and one to three deputies each, contingent on the department's size. So 50 sounds about right, and 100 would be excessive. The rest would be civil servants who, you know, actually know their job.

 

[Olde Europe]

While I'm not arguing with any of the above, why is any of that a concern for concentrated capital? Does it not result in little to no representation for the unsubstantial people which was the goal of this system from day 1? (Only white male members of the aristocracy were "divinely" granted the "right" to vote)

The system will not change until enough of us change our behavior as opposed to forever hoping we'll be allowed to choose someone from the pre-selected slate of the aristocracy's egomaniacs.

Perhaps it is we the people who have sidelined ourselves via voting only to couch sit over the term of the "candidate" we voted for, and we're all unwilling to stand up to the system's Orange Clown, who is merely another contemptible charlatan symptomatic of a dysfunctional society. We have no shortage of them to follow Don up with.

Asking, pleading with the system to sort itself out for the good of the people is folly.

The U.S., as you correctly note, was set up as a plutocracy preventing the paupers from voting the money of the rich into their own pockets. In a way, it still is, even though the franchise has been, haltingly and reluctantly, extended to groups that previously were excluded. One way to do this is a House of Congress comprising just 435 members (the British House of Commons has 650, for a population a fifth the size of the U.S.'s) - which makes for excessively large voting districts, which means a lot of money is required to campaign even for a House seat.

That, in turn, reinforces the low number of parties realistically to choose from, as preordained by FPTP voting, which makes the whole thing easier to control - by the plutocrats. Just for starters... No, I don't know how to remedy that, other than to hope for that arc of justice to bend toward something brighter and better, perhaps, decades or centuries into the future by way of paying attention and voting for the lesser evil, consistently.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Then I'm not entirely sure what the point of your previous post was.

My point was her biography is an invention.

I didn't know about the whole website controversy but I will say that the claim she worked as an escort was not mentioned there.

It was brought up by some guy named Adam Schlecter in his book From the Whorehouse to the White House. It's little more than a long article published in book form (it's only 58 pages) by an independent publisher that no longer exists.

However, no one seems to know who this guy is and the one time somebody actually talked to him about his claims, he refused to give any details.

My uninformed opinion is that when dealing with people who have fictitious biographies - or multiple multi-million $ fraud settlements - in their past, their words should be taken with a truckload of salt. Call me crazy.

Irrelevant. This has nothing to do with her website biography and is not a claim she made in any case. The allegation that she worked as an escort was claimed by someone else but has not been proven or verified in any way.

The burden of proof is on the person making the allegation, not Melania. That being the case, it is up to him to prove the allegation that she worked as an escort; it is not up to Melania to answer for the website controversy because of this allegation.

You say "multiple multi-million dollar settlements"; unless there's an unrelated lawsuit I don't know about, these lawsuits pertain to the same allegation: that she worked as an escort. Also, "multiple" is a bit of an exaggeration as I believe there were only two entities sued: the Daily Mail and the blogger whom the Daily Mail was citing.

Trump's shit never requires proof.

New day pard, hear it, it's true, welcome to The Reality America Show. Maybe Don's own shyte got turned on him. Who knows, who ever will?

That's the point, on to the next scandal, fast as ya can, resolve nothing.

I saw somewhere she's the nicest piece of plastic surgery work we've seen in that coveted I-fock-the-president position historically. But I've not looked into that personally so I won't state it as fact.

This is not about Trump, it's about Melania.

 

[joaquinmiller]

What would be the optimum number - shepherding a civilian workforce of 2,100,000? I've no idea, but we appear able to vet them, or delay them, on a whim. I don't think workload is a problem. (Nor did you imply it.) The current numbers may be the more-or-less correct ratio of politicians to implement policy, and civil servants to keep it between the ditches.

I was rather thinking of 15 department heads (secretaries) and one to three deputies each, contingent on the department's size. So 50 sounds about right, and 100 would be excessive. The rest would be civil servants who, you know, actually know their job.

Sounds like a plan! I actually make it 756 appointments requiring Senate confirmation - including 266 at State, 210 at Justice and 52 at Defense. I assume those are primarily State Attorneys, Foreign Service Ambassador-level staff, and heads of Services and Joint Chiefs. I think those all merit more scrutiny than taking Pompeo's or Barr's words for it, e.g.

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

Trump has had no history of homophobia...

Nov. 27, 2019, 8:08 AM MST
By Julie Moreau

"The Trump administration is “undoing decades of civil and human rights progress” — especially when it comes to LGBTQ issues — according to a new report by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, an independent, bipartisan advisory agency.

In its 621-page report, “Are Civil Rights a Reality?,” the commission found that, despite the “extraordinary volume” of civil rights complaints filed in the first two years of the Trump administration, agencies charged with protecting civil rights "generally lack adequate resources to investigate and resolve discrimination allegations within their jurisdiction, leaving allegations of civil rights violations unredressed.”


With respect to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer civil rights, the report criticized several policy changes under the Trump administration that have limited the ability of federal agencies to enforce LGBTQ civil rights or redirected efforts toward other priorities.

“In addition to using the budget and other processes to undermine civil rights enforcement, the Administration has also changed course in many substantive civil rights policy areas,” Karen Narasaki, one of the commission’s eight members, stated in the report, which was released last Thursday. “An obvious example is this Administration’s rollback of efforts to combat LGBTQ discrimination.”

“The changes I’ve watched unfold since 2016 are truly unprecedented in the nearly 30 years I have worked in the nation’s Capital,” Narasaki added. “This Administration is not just shifting enforcement priorities, they are undoing decades of civil and human rights progress.”"
More ~~ Civil rights agency slams Trump admin over LGBTQ policies ~~

To claim Trump has NO HISTORY OF HOMOPHOBIA is to LIE THROUGH YOUR TEETH! Read the report summary because I know you wouldn't have the attention span or comprehension skills to read the complete 621 report you bloody lying fool... too many words with five or more letters words!!!!

I see that you didn't notice how they are deceiving you, pay attention to the quotes in this section from NBC news:

In its 621-page report, “Are Civil Rights a Reality?,” the commission found that, despite the “extraordinary volume” of civil rights complaints filed in the first two years of the Trump administration, agencies charged with protecting civil rights "generally lack adequate resources to investigate and resolve discrimination allegations within their jurisdiction, leaving allegations of civil rights violations unredressed.”

bolding mine

=====================

Here is the full section from the Executive Summary, page 18:

"As documented in this report, the extraordinary volume of complaints filed with federal civil rights agencies and findings and resolutions from these agencies underscore the reality that, today, the nation still has not reached a time when recognition of and protection for core civil rights promises is the norm for all Americans. The Commission heard compelling bipartisan testimony regarding ongoing widespread civil rights harms that underscore the need for strong federal agency enforcement of federal civil rights laws."

Note the past tense?

"....the nation still has not reached a time..."

See what they did?

This part is true, the rest above in the bold are misleading,

"generally lack adequate resources to investigate and resolve discrimination allegations within their jurisdiction, leaving allegations of civil rights violations unredressed.”

That was from the Executive Summary you didn't read (pages 15-19), where no mention of Trumps name mentioned, It has been a problem for many years, long before Trump arrived, a problem that is still not being fully addressed, as pointed out in the report. It is an ongoing problem that needs to be addressed, suggesting that Congress address some of the causes. Some of it during the Trump era, and from PREVIOUS administrations.

From the LETTER to the President you didn't read, from pages 5-6,

Excerpt:

"The Commission majority approved key findings including the following: the extraordinary volume of complaints filed with federal civil rights agencies and findings and resolutions from these agencies underscore the reality that, today, the nation still has not reached a time when recognition of and protection for core civil rights promises is the norm for all Americans. The Commission heard compelling bipartisan testimony regarding ongoing widespread civil rights harms that underscore the need for strong federal agency enforcement of federal civil rights laws. In evaluating data across 13 agencies, the Commission found agencies generally lack adequate resources to investigate and resolve discrimination allegations within their jurisdiction, leaving allegations of civil rights violations unredressed.

I see that you didn't notice how they are deceiving you, pay attention to the quotes in this section from NBC news:

Really? From my perspective, the facts portray your struggle with English reading comprehension, Comrade! Da? You see, the possibility of verbs changing tense from paragraph to paragraph written in English is simply to be expected. I had Mrs. Brennen in 7th & 8th grade English, may God Bless her soul, and I learned rather than to perish under her disapproving gaze!

ANYWAY, what the Hell is your point? The point you quote multiple different sentences then you point your finger toward the sky and proclaim, "Looky, flying verbs Boss, flying verbs."

Now the Transmittal Letter to POTUS: And just how are you assured I didn't read it when the topic I took exception to with the OP pertained to specific discrimination to which the OP poster took exception even though the evidence is overwhelming in the report. You presented the quote directly below claiming, "From the LETTER to the President you didn't read, from pages 5-6,"....

The Commission majority approved key findings including the following: the extraordinary volume of complaints filed with federal civil rights agencies and findings and resolutions from these agencies underscore the reality that, today, the nation still has not reached a time when recognition of and protection for core civil rights promises is the norm for all Americans. The Commission heard compelling bipartisan testimony regarding ongoing widespread civil rights harms that underscore the need for strong federal agency enforcement of federal civil rights laws. In evaluating data across 13 agencies, the Commission found agencies generally lack adequate resources to investigate and resolve discrimination allegations within their jurisdiction, leaving allegations of civil rights violations unredressed.

OK, what significance was that supposed to have with the price of potatoes OR my post to another you piggybacked??

BTW, when you cite a page from a mag. article, a book, a transcript, et al, use the page of the document being referenced and not the page number your computer software happens to arbitrarily present UNLESS you have the good grace to inform the reader!

Now you should write a response which is comprehensible with a beginning, a middle and an end which flows sans fits and starts and bends! Or not and follow your tribe!