Redfish
Diamond Member
passed by republicans after the dems tried to fillibuster it., fool.
Bush worst president in 100 years.
- Thread starter Dr Grump
- Start date
passed by republicans after the dems tried to fillibuster it., fool.
Peach
Gold Member
- Jan 10, 2009
- 20,864
- 2,732
- 245
I hope you are well and rested today Kosh; and Buchanan, a Democrat, gets worst in US history, thus far. LBJ was an SOB but did pass the civil rights act. I would take Eisenhower over any since, myself. Or Truman.
Last edited:
Dr Grump
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #263
So, about twice as smart as you, and a dozen times smarter than Obama, then....
He's still smarter than you. So is the last shit my Dingo took, so it isn't praise of Dubya.
More drivel from a person with an IQ of an amoeba. You really shouldn't get involved in threads that are waaayyyy above your ability to comprehend. Now, go back to your cot...
Anybody who puts the words "Dubya" and "smarter" in the same sentence shows about as much intelligence as a lobotomised chimp....
PoliticalTorch
VIP Member
Dad2three
Gold Member
Why, because your links say something different than mine?
My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours?
So Bush was in charge then, and Obuma has been in charge since 2008 and the democraps haven't learned shit!....Obama Administration Pushing Banks to Offer Sub-prime Mortgages againÂ… And When It Implodes AgainÂ….
http://pamelageller.com/2011/05/oba...tgages-again-and-when-it-implodes-again.html/
Weird you give an OPINION piece with a bunch of unrelated CRAP blaming the Dems (who had ZERO power as regulator of F/F, THAT WAS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, DUBYA) AND IT WASN'T A CRISIS CREATED BY F/F (THOUGH DUBYA HOSED THEM BY HIS POLICIES)
Let me know IF 'subprimes' Obama is pushing come ANYWHERE near what happened in the WORLD WIDE BANKSTER CREDIT BUBBLE. Grow up and grow a brain!
No, the GSEs Did Not Cause the Financial Meltdown (but thats just according to the data)
1. Private markets caused the shady mortgage boom: The first thing to point out is that the both the subprime mortgage boom and the subsequent crash are very much concentrated in the private market, especially the private label securitization channel (PLS) market. The Government-Sponsored Entities (GSEs, or Fannie and Freddie) were not behind them. The fly-by-night lending boom, slicing and dicing mortgage bonds, derivatives and CDOs, and all the other shadiness of the mortgage market in the 2000s were Wall Street creations, and they drove all those risky mortgages.
Here’s some data to back that up: “More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions… Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.”
2. The governmentÂ’s affordability mission didnÂ’t cause the crisis:
4. Conservatives sang a different tune before the crash: Conservative think tanks spent the 2000s saying the exact opposite of what they are saying now
MY FAV, THE INFO YOUR LINK GOT HIS 'DATA' FROM (PETER WALLISON/ED PINTO/AEI TALKING POINTS)
AEI'S Peter Wallison in 2004: “In recent years, study after study has shown that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are failing to do even as much as banks and S&Ls in providing financing for affordable housing, including minority and low income housing.”
Hey Mayor Bloomberg! No, the GSEs Did Not Cause the Financial Meltdown (but thats just according to the data) | The Big Picture
HE'S THE ONLY DISSENTING MEMBER OF THE FCIC's CONCLUSIONS THAT GOV'T POLICY DIDN'T CAUSE THE BANKSTER MELTDOWN. 3 GOPers said he was full of it
Dad2three
Gold Member
You meant passed by a greater number of Dems when the SOUTHERNERS of both parties tried to filibuster it? You know today's GOP base?
Dad2three
Gold Member
Got it, besides pointing at the gay guy - 'barney did it' or the black (Muslim, Kenyan, Socialists, Marxist) guy you can't actually refute a damn thing posited!
Dad2three
Gold Member
"08/21/2013"
lol
Oct. 22, 2013
The Myth That Obamacare Is Destroying Full-Time Jobs Just Got Debunked
According to the BLS household survey, part-time jobs fell 594,000 in September while full-time workers were up 691,000.
DUBYA= MINUS 673,000+ PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS
OBAMA 10+ MILLION SINCE HITTING BUSH'S BOTTOM MARCH 2010
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Dad2three
Gold Member
Barack Obama bests Bill Clinton's private sector job creation record
June marks 52 straight months of private sector job growth, the longest ever on record, beating out Bill Clinton's record of 51 continuous months of private sector job growth from February 1996 to April 2000. The economy has added more than 200,000 jobs for five months in a row now, the longest such streak since 1999. In the first half of this year alone the economy has added 1.4 million jobs, another accomplishment not seen since 1999.
Barack Obama bests Bill Clinton's private sector job creation record ? The People's View
The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America—in 5 Graphs
The second thing we should expect to see from Part-Time America is a growing number of part-time jobs since Obama came into office and started passing laws. Here's a graph showing the number of people working part-time for economic reasons since March 2010, the month Obamacare was passed.
MORE
The Spectacular Myth of Obama's Part-Time America?in 5 Graphs - Derek Thompson - The Atlantic
Oh my the far left posters will believe any thing a far left blog site posts...
Got it you can't refute FACTS
Bureau of Labor Statistics Data
Dad2three
Gold Member
Why, because your links say something different than mine?
My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours?
So Bush was in charge then, and Obuma has been in charge since 2008 and the democraps haven't learned shit!....Obama Administration Pushing Banks to Offer Sub-prime Mortgages againÂ… And When It Implodes AgainÂ….
http://pamelageller.com/2011/05/oba...tgages-again-and-when-it-implodes-again.html/
Libss have been running congress for eight years now and all we hears is....
Boooooosssssshhhhhhh
8 Years huh? Oh you mean 2 under Bush AFTER he ran it into the ground? What could they do then? ONE bill that changed Dubya/GOP policy pre 2009?
The Myth of Democratic Super Majority.
The Truth is that the Democrats only had a filibuster-proof majority for 24 working days during that period (2009-2010). Here are the details:
Democrats only had a veto proof majority for 24 working days | Fact Left
Dad2three
Gold Member
How much did Dubya's tax cuts cost per job?
Stimulus (40% tax cuts wasted BECAUSE the GOP refused otherwise, and 20% aid to states.local)
IT WAS DESIGNED FOR ONE PURPOSE, KEEP US OUT OF ANOTHER GOP GREAT DEPRESSION
Economists agree: Stimulus created nearly 3 million jobs
It's no surprise that the administration would proclaim its own policies a success. But its verdict is backed by economists at Goldman Sachs, IHS Global Insight, JPMorgan Chase and Macroeconomic Advisers, who say the stimulus boosted gross domestic product by 2.1% to 2.7%.
Economists agree: Stimulus created nearly 3 million jobs - USATODAY.com
CBO Director Demolishes GOP's Stimulus Myth
Under questioning from skeptical Republicans, the director of the nonpartisan (and widely respected) Congressional Budget Office was emphatic about the value of the 2009 stimulus. And, he said, the vast majority of economists agree.
In a survey conducted by the University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 80 percent of economic experts agreed that, because of the stimulus, the U.S. unemployment rate was lower at the end of 2010 than it would have been otherwise.
"Only 4 percent disagreed or strongly disagreed," CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf told the House Budget Committee. "That," he added, "is a distinct minority."
CBO Director Demolishes GOP's Stimulus Myth
Dad2three
Gold Member
Why, because your links say something different than mine?
My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours?
So Bush was in charge then, and Obuma has been in charge since 2008 and the democraps haven't learned shit!....Obama Administration Pushing Banks to Offer Sub-prime Mortgages againÂ… And When It Implodes AgainÂ….
http://pamelageller.com/2011/05/oba...tgages-again-and-when-it-implodes-again.html/
" My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours? "
PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE IT DOES THAT?
Your link to the hate lady, is about REDLINING, NOT SUBPRIME LOANS. Know the difference? lol
An official government report was produced in April 2011 by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) and Ranking Member Tom Coburn (R-OK), titled Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse. The “Levin-Coburn Report,” a 639-page document, including 2,849 footnotes unanimously and unambiguously concluded that “the [2008] crisis was not a natural disaster, but the result of high risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, the credit rating agencies, and the market itself to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.”
This myth got traction in January 2011, when after conducting over five hundred interviews and holding twelve days of hearings, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) failed to produce a unified report. The 545-page book the panel did publish, titled The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report: Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States, had three sections. The first part was a lengthy majority report endorsed by the six Democratic appointees. This was followed by two much shorter dissents. Reading the three parts together, it is clear that all ten commissioners agreed that the collapse of the U.S. housing bubble was the proximate cause of the crisis.
In addition, there was substantial consensus among nine of the commissioners. For these nine—including three of the four Republican appointees—the centerpiece of the consensus was that poor risk management at U.S. financial institutions was a chief contributor to the crisis. For example, all nine agreed that risk management failures at financial institutions led to insufficient capital and a reliance on short-term borrowing.
Toxic bankers, captive regulators: Everything you think about the housing market is wrong - Salon.com
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #273
Why, because your links say something different than mine?
My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours?
So Bush was in charge then, and Obuma has been in charge since 2008 and the democraps haven't learned shit!....Obama Administration Pushing Banks to Offer Sub-prime Mortgages againÂ… And When It Implodes AgainÂ….
http://pamelageller.com/2011/05/oba...tgages-again-and-when-it-implodes-again.html/
Weird you give an OPINION piece with a bunch of unrelated CRAP blaming the Dems (who had ZERO power as regulator of F/F, THAT WAS THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH, DUBYA) AND IT WASN'T A CRISIS CREATED BY F/F (THOUGH DUBYA HOSED THEM BY HIS POLICIES)
Let me know IF 'subprimes' Obama is pushing come ANYWHERE near what happened in the WORLD WIDE BANKSTER CREDIT BUBBLE. Grow up and grow a brain!
No, the GSEs Did Not Cause the Financial Meltdown (but thats just according to the data)
1. Private markets caused the shady mortgage boom: The first thing to point out is that the both the subprime mortgage boom and the subsequent crash are very much concentrated in the private market, especially the private label securitization channel (PLS) market. The Government-Sponsored Entities (GSEs, or Fannie and Freddie) were not behind them. The fly-by-night lending boom, slicing and dicing mortgage bonds, derivatives and CDOs, and all the other shadiness of the mortgage market in the 2000s were Wall Street creations, and they drove all those risky mortgages.
Here’s some data to back that up: “More than 84 percent of the subprime mortgages in 2006 were issued by private lending institutions… Private firms made nearly 83 percent of the subprime loans to low- and moderate-income borrowers that year.”
2. The governmentÂ’s affordability mission didnÂ’t cause the crisis:
4. Conservatives sang a different tune before the crash: Conservative think tanks spent the 2000s saying the exact opposite of what they are saying now
MY FAV, THE INFO YOUR LINK GOT HIS 'DATA' FROM (PETER WALLISON/ED PINTO/AEI TALKING POINTS)
AEI'S Peter Wallison in 2004: “In recent years, study after study has shown that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are failing to do even as much as banks and S&Ls in providing financing for affordable housing, including minority and low income housing.”
Hey Mayor Bloomberg! No, the GSEs Did Not Cause the Financial Meltdown (but thats just according to the data) | The Big Picture
HE'S THE ONLY DISSENTING MEMBER OF THE FCIC's CONCLUSIONS THAT GOV'T POLICY DIDN'T CAUSE THE BANKSTER MELTDOWN. 3 GOPers said he was full of it
Oh Please! You are getting redundant, and boring with your bullshit!
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314]How The Democrats Caused The Financial Crisis: Starring Bill Clinton's HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo And Barack Obama; With Special Guest Appearances By Bill Clinton And Jimmy Carter - YouTube[/ame]
deltex1
Gold Member
The current Newsmax.com poll is 80/20 against Obabble.
Vigilante
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #275
Why, because your links say something different than mine?
My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours?
So Bush was in charge then, and Obuma has been in charge since 2008 and the democraps haven't learned shit!....Obama Administration Pushing Banks to Offer Sub-prime Mortgages againÂ… And When It Implodes AgainÂ….
http://pamelageller.com/2011/05/oba...tgages-again-and-when-it-implodes-again.html/
" My links show the subprime crisis started much earlier, and I should believe yours? "
PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE IT DOES THAT?
Your link to the hate lady, is about REDLINING, NOT SUBPRIME LOANS. Know the difference? lol
An official government report was produced in April 2011 by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Chairman Carl Levin (D-MI) and Ranking Member Tom Coburn (R-OK), titled Wall Street and the Financial Crisis: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse. The “Levin-Coburn Report,” a 639-page document, including 2,849 footnotes unanimously and unambiguously concluded that “the [2008] crisis was not a natural disaster, but the result of high risk, complex financial products; undisclosed conflicts of interest; and the failure of regulators, the credit rating agencies, and the market itself to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.”
This myth got traction in January 2011, when after conducting over five hundred interviews and holding twelve days of hearings, the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC) failed to produce a unified report. The 545-page book the panel did publish, titled The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report: Final Report of the National Commission on the Causes of the Financial and Economic Crisis in the United States, had three sections. The first part was a lengthy majority report endorsed by the six Democratic appointees. This was followed by two much shorter dissents. Reading the three parts together, it is clear that all ten commissioners agreed that the collapse of the U.S. housing bubble was the proximate cause of the crisis.
In addition, there was substantial consensus among nine of the commissioners. For these nine—including three of the four Republican appointees—the centerpiece of the consensus was that poor risk management at U.S. financial institutions was a chief contributor to the crisis. For example, all nine agreed that risk management failures at financial institutions led to insufficient capital and a reliance on short-term borrowing.
Toxic bankers, captive regulators: Everything you think about the housing market is wrong - Salon.com
A 2011 Senate panel headed by DEMOCRAT LEVIN who had previously covered up the involvement of Dodd and Frank in their Fannie Mae affair and the head of it Franklin Raines!
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
-
BREAKING: Protesters in Cuba attack Communist Party office in rare riot over blackouts
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 1
