Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't have to, it is my OPINION. You have stated , unless your now denying it, that Bush lied by stating no doubt about WMD's and you have used as your supposed proof the fact that AFTER the fact none were found. You have ignored every Democrat, ever foreign Government and every Intelligence report prior to the invasion, including the SANCTIONS of the UN, that prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that just about every SANE person believed with no doubt that Iraq had WMD's. And when ask for proof you resort to " it's my opinion". Guess what? Since you do not have to prove an opinion, something you have been quick to point out when YOU get caught in an obvious lie, I do not have to prove my opinion.
Again JUST for you, in MY OPINION, every time you claim Bush lied using your none proof anfd your OPINION, I believe that means your stating there were was no doubt there were no wmd's in Iraq prior to the invasion. Since it was COMMON accepted knowledge he had them and since the NIE clearly states all Intell agencies of the US believed he had them ( with NO DOUBT) and you keep claiming otherwise, that is MY OPINION.
Or are you now going to say you have never called Bush a liar? Never said he "mislead" the American people, and that you believe so because you claim he said " no doubt" and meant it as a personal claim?
you said I made a claim. that is the issue here. I made no such claim. Just like I never attacked Bush's military service in 1999. YOu say shit about me and it is not correct. You said:
"Remind me how Bush lied because he was certain WMD's existed and your not a liar by claiming you were certain they did NOT exist BEFORE we invaded?"
I never claimed I was certain of any such thing. YOU misspoke. You said I claimed something that I have not claimed. YOU are a liar. That's a fact.
If you can base your entire opinion that Bush lied on 3 words he spoke and what you claim those three words mean, Then my opinion of what you mean from volumes of words on this board is a lot easier to understand.
you said I made a claim. I made no such claim. that's a fact. I have never even intimated that I was CERTAIN that WMD's did not exist prior to the invasion. never. YOu lied and I called you on it, and just like the other times, you will wiggle around and tap dance and run away from being a man and just admitting that you made a statement that was not true.... you're a liar and a chickenshit little coward who has no balls and no integrity. that has been proven over and over again.
And I base my opinion of our president on a myriad of speeches made by him and his team from the summer of 2002 until the beginning of the war....not merely three words.
Wrong again. Ever time you start in with claiming that Bush lied and that the NIE did not say what it says you make the claim.
As for the President he based what he said on Intelligence reports from our and foreign agencies. And they ALL agreed, Saddam Hussein had WMDs. Saddam Hussein supported terrorism. Saddam Hussein tried to assassinate one of our Presidents. On and on.
you're a moron. Just because I question the administration's assertions of certainty does not mean that I am expressing certainty of the reverse. I have NEVER made the claim - as you erroneously stated - that I was certain that Saddam did NOT have WMD's.
Your use and understanding of the English language is pathetic. I know grade school children who can communicate with more precision than you.
And your level of integrity is appalling. You have none.
Wrong, just as you can create from whole cloth a condition that does not exist, Bush lied, I can create from your words the condition I have ascribed to you. It has just as much reality as yours and just as much fact to back it up. In fact MY position has more fact, since I have over a year of your ignorant claims Bush lied and all you have is 3 words.
I have questioned Bush's assertions of absolute certainty. I have never claimed absolute certainty in reverse. And as I have said over and over and over and over again...I have much more than three words. Are you incapable of reading as well as writing?
This assertion of yours that I claimed that I was absolutely certain Saddam did not have WMD's is just as ridiculous as your claiming that I attacked Bush's military service in 1999. It was bullshit from day one but it took you a month or more to finally weasel your way around to admitting that you had made the whole thing up. This is the same thing. You are a moron and a liar and have all the integrity of a wolverine.
Still wrong. But do keep whining like the sailor you are.
I am not whining. I am just calling you a liar. I have proven it before and you have slinked away with your tail between your legs (plenty of room there, given the fact that you have no balls)...and I am proving it again here.
You say shit about people on this board and then do not have the integrity to admit when you have fucked up.
That'a ain't whining on my part...that is simply shining a light on your poor character.
Saddam did NOT collaborate with AQ. THAT IS a fact.
Can't you read?
That's not what the article states.
Boy... Bush should put you on his payroll... I'm sure it's always good for someone like him to have mindless followers.......
Nope, this is just crybaby whining maineman, he hasn't a leg to stand on so he goes on for page after page about how he is right and others are wrong. Ohh and dumbshit, I have never slunk away from anyone, especially you. Your the king of liars. You have spent months telling us that Bush lied when he did no such thing and when pushed for proof you have had to admit it is just your opinion.
That's not what the article states.
Wow...no shit!
1 exaggerating the threat of Saddam's Weapons of Mass Destruction,(those infamous Dim quotes)
2 by claiming ceertainty regarding those WMD's, (Al Gore, Pelosi, etc.)
3 by repeatedly implying that those weapons of mass destruction would be provided to terrorists who would use them against us,(testimony given to the 9/11 Comminssion- 1997 thru 1999)
4 by repeatedly tying Al Qaeda, Saddam (AGAIN, testimony given to the 9/11 Commission..97 thur99...)
EXACTLY....EXACTLY....EXACTLY....and EXACTLY....
what we heard from the Dims for years, during the Clinton admin....Exactly....
.
Sad but convenient,.... your memory seems to not extend back to before 2001....
again...who gives a shit what Clinton did? He did NOT start the ground war in Iraq.
(cute trick with your #4, by the way.... incomplete quote of mine which removes the context.... totally sleazy!)
"There is "no credible evidence" that Saddam Hussein's government in Iraq collaborated with the al Qaeda terrorist network on any attacks on the United States, according to a new staff report released this morning by the commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Although Osama bin Laden briefly explored the idea of forging ties with Iraq in the mid-1990s, the terrorist leader was hostile to Hussein's secular government, and Iraq never responded to requests for help in providing training camps or weapons, the panel found in the first of two reports issued today."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46254-2004Jun16.html
