Bush and Officials Lied leading up to Iraq war

[jillian]

The nays would have had it if all the democrats would have voted Nay

If it couldn't pass without democratic votes, it wouldn't have been sent to the floor.

 

[maineman]

The nays would have had it if all the democrats would have voted Nay

what's your point? that some democrats fucked up? I know that. They are ALL on my shitlist until they publicly repent. It still does not change the fact that in CONGRESS, a MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS did NOT vote for the use of force.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If it couldn't pass without democratic votes, it wouldn't have been sent to the floor.

And yet only 22 voted against it. Make that 21 since 2 republicans voted no. Ohh wait only 20 democrats voted no as one of the no votes was an independent.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

what's your point? that some democrats fucked up? I know that. They are ALL on my shitlist until they publicly repent. It still does not change the fact that in CONGRESS, a MAJORITY OF DEMOCRATS did NOT vote for the use of force.

Yes a "majority" of democrats DID vote for it. unless your claiming there were only 40 democrats in the Senate?

 

[maineman]

Yes a "majority" of democrats DID vote for it. unless your claiming there were only 40 democrats in the Senate?

I say that a majority of democrats in congress votes against the resolution.

would you like to bet money that I am wrong?

name the amount.

 

[maineman]

cat got your tongue?

or have you learned your civics lesson for the day?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I say that a majority of democrats in congress votes against the resolution.

would you like to bet money that I am wrong?

name the amount.

The specific vote provided in the Senate proves your wrong IN the Senate. A majority of Democrats in fact DID vote for that measure. Or do I need to remind that more than 40 democrats were in the Senate at that vote? Do I need to list for you all the democrats names in the Senate that voted FOR the measure.

Now you can play your word games all you want and claim that the House dems didn't but that does NOT change the fact that the LISTED vote was from the SENATE and in fact a MAJORITY of Democratic Senators voted FOR it.

Maybe YOU need the civics lesson?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

cat got your tongue?

or have you learned your civics lesson for the day?

And once again only losers resort to claiming on a message board that a failure to respond as fast as you want is somehow a win for themselves.

 

[jillian]

And once again only losers resort to claiming on a message board that a failure to respond as fast as you want is somehow a win for themselves.

Please remember that next time you harass someone else for having a life and not posting right away.

Hope you're feeling better, btw.

 

[jreeves]

None of you liberals, have answered this question from my previous post...

I think this is the third time I have asked this question...so if you can't answer those questions you can't exactly say he misled us Americans.

 

[maineman]

The specific vote provided in the Senate proves your wrong IN the Senate. A majority of Democrats in fact DID vote for that measure. Or do I need to remind that more than 40 democrats were in the Senate at that vote? Do I need to list for you all the democrats names in the Senate that voted FOR the measure.

Now you can play your word games all you want and claim that the House dems didn't but that does NOT change the fact that the LISTED vote was from the SENATE and in fact a MAJORITY of Democratic Senators voted FOR it.

Maybe YOU need the civics lesson?

go back and read what I said, and what I have only said all along - ***** - and you will see that I have said - ALL ALONG - that a majority of democrats IN CONGRESS voted against the measure. Now, do you want to bet that I am wrong about THAT, or do you want to crawl under a ******* rock and hide - or do you want to admit that I am right. TAKE YOUR ******* PICK - *****. I'll wait.

Ask yourself again..what does the ******* word CONGRESS really mean....*****.

 

[jreeves]

go back and read what I said, and what I have only said all along - ***** - and you will see that I have said - ALL ALONG - that a majority of democrats IN CONGRESS voted against the measure. Now, do you want to bet that I am wrong about THAT, or do you want to crawl under a ******* rock and hide - or do you want to admit that I am right. TAKE YOUR ******* PICK - *****. I'll wait.

Ask yourself again..what does the ******* word CONGRESS really mean....*****.

The liberalistic agenda call people bitches and avoid the issues...LOL

 

[maineman]

The liberalistic agenda call people bitches and avoid the issues...LOL

I avoid nothing.

go back and read my position on this matter: it has never changed. A majority of congressional democrats voted against the war in Iraq. The republican party was nearly unanimous in their support of it.

I am proud of that distinction.


*****.

 

[jreeves]

I avoid nothing.

go back and read my position on this matter: it has never changed. A majority of congressional democrats voted against the war in Iraq. The republican party was nearly unanimous in their support of it.

I am proud of that distinction.


*****.

You still haven't answered the question I have asked now 4 times from liberals??????????????????? waiting.....

 

[jreeves]

You still haven't answered the question I have asked now 4 times from liberals??????????????????? waiting.....

BTW its post 937..

 

[maineman]

RGS:

go review:

911
917
922
924
926
940
942
944 (oops)
945
947 (oops)

and then see if you can spell "mea culpa"

 

[jreeves]

RGS:

go review:

911
917
922
924
926
940
942
944 (oops)
945
947 (oops)

and then see if you can spell "mea culpa"

Just answer the question or can you?

 

[Dr Grump]

Ok, if Bush misled the U.S people with false intelligence what was the purpose for 1? Second of all how did he also get other countries to say that Saddam had WMD's? Remember your the one's saying that the coalition was non-exstient. Anyone?

I don't think it was false, I just don't think they really knew what was going on and made shit up to satisfy the president, and he took bits and pieces from it that served his purpose. He didn't get other countries to do squat, I believe their sources were the same.

What coalition? Of the willing? You mean like Albania and Lithuania? That coalition?? LOL...The 1991 Gulf War - now that was as coalition..

 

[maineman]

Ok, if Bush misled the U.S people with false intelligence what was the purpose for 1? Second of all how did he also get other countries to say that Saddam had WMD's? Remember your the one's saying that the coalition was non-exstient. Anyone?

I direct your attention to:

http://www.newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm

that illuminates clearly the purpose for Bush's deception.

any questions?

 

[maineman]

Just answer the question or can you?

my post was in response to RGS...

you: shut the **** up.

I answered you later.