Bush AG: "No question" Obama has "obligation" to fill the seat

[hazlnut]

Bush AG Alberto Gonzales: ‘No question’ Obama has ‘obligation’ to fill Supreme Court vacancy

Suck it bitches.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

 

[Siete]

what is so different about appointing a a SC Justice ?

if Obama does, the Right whines ..

if Obama doesn't, the right whines ..

 

[80zephyr]

How do we apply the lessons we learned from Roberts and Alito to be the next nominee, especially if—God forbid—there is another vacancy under this president? … [F]or the rest of this president’s term and if there is another Republican elected with the same selection criteria let me say this: We should reverse the presumption of confirmation. The Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito. Given the track record of this president and the experience of obfuscation at the hearings—with respect to the Supreme Court, at least—I will recommend to my colleagues that we should not confirm a Supreme Court nominee except in extraordinary circumstances.


~~ Senator Charles Schumer, July 27, 2007

 

[Timmy]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So, block them, but they are required to vote and they are refusing to do that.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

^^^^ that.

 

[WelfareQueen]

Bush AG Alberto Gonzales: ‘No question’ Obama has ‘obligation’ to fill Supreme Court vacancy

Suck it bitches.

And the Senate will slow walk it just like Obama always does with things like the I.R.S. scandal.....Fast and Furious...Benghazi.....Clinton e-mails, etc.

Suck it bitch.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

We know that with Obama's tendency to go far left with everything he does, why should we expect anything less from his pick for a justice? He's probably going over the records of every liberal hack on the 9th Circuit because he knows that everyone thinks that circuit court is the all-time joke of jurisprudence in American history.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

Yeah, and those people who claim Obama doesn't follow the Constitution are already sitting on the Supreme Court!

 

[Harry Dresden]

what is so different about appointing a a SC Justice ?

if Obama does, the Right whines ..

if Obama doesn't, the right whines ..

and the thing is.....kennedy and ginsberg will,i would think,be gone in the next four years,so the next one no matter whom it may be,will be putting two in place....

 

[aaronleland]

what is so different about appointing a a SC Justice ?

if Obama does, the Right whines ..

if Obama doesn't, the right whines ..

and the thing is.....kennedy and ginsberg will,i would think,be gone in the next four years,so the next one no matter whom it may be,will be putting two in place....

Your avatar reminds me. Have you seen the Daredevil trailer that was released this morning? Looks awesome.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

Too funny. With any intent their constituents so demand.

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

Now tell us how they are not.

 

[Harry Dresden]

what is so different about appointing a a SC Justice ?

if Obama does, the Right whines ..

if Obama doesn't, the right whines ..

and the thing is.....kennedy and ginsberg will,i would think,be gone in the next four years,so the next one no matter whom it may be,will be putting two in place....

Your avatar reminds me. Have you seen the Daredevil trailer that was released this morning? Looks awesome.

yes i have.....i agree,this season should be pretty good.....

​

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So, block them, but they are required to vote and they are refusing to do that.

Where is a vote required? Show it.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Bush AG Alberto Gonzales: ‘No question’ Obama has ‘obligation’ to fill Supreme Court vacancy

Suck it bitches.

Indeed. He has the responsibility to NOMINATE a candidate. That's the END of his job. It's up to the SENATE after that and his nominee will get nowhere.

Enjoy sucking on that.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

As long as Obama nominates a Conservative Italian American to fill the Scalia seat, it's all good. The People spoke and gave the Senate to Scalia's Party

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So, block them, but they are required to vote and they are refusing to do that.

Where is a vote required? Show it.

"[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."

Without a vote they can't do the Consent part.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

He does.

And the Senate majority has an obligation - and a right - to its constituents to block unacceptable nominees,

So long as they act with good intentions. As it stands, they are saying they will block anyone just cause it's obama .

And these are the same people who claim obama doesn't follow the constitution .

As long as Obama nominates a Conservative Italian American to fill the Scalia seat, it's all good. The People spoke and gave the Senate to Scalia's Party

In reality he never had a party. It's not a partisan role.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Bush AG Alberto Gonzales: ‘No question’ Obama has ‘obligation’ to fill Supreme Court vacancy

Suck it bitches.

Indeed. He has the responsibility to NOMINATE a candidate. That's the END of his job. It's up to the SENATE after that and his nominee will get nowhere.

Enjoy sucking on that.

Nothing like ignoring the Constitution, and what you get paid for eh?