because Obama wants to add "right wing extremists" aka: Veterans and NRA member to that list.
So right wing terrorists should have access to guns
One day, maybe real soon at the rate we're going, calling Republicans the "enemy" is going to stop being cute and funny
When are republicans going to do anything
"When are republicans going to do anything."
Right after you change your avi to reflect the truth?
Yep. RWNJs always blame others for their own actions/inaction.
"Yep. RWNJs always blame others for their own actions/inaction."
Help me with this....
....is this 'action' or 'inaction'?
. Obama made a huge mistake in
refusing to negotiate an agreement to leave US troops in Iraq.
This is the source of the problem with ISIS: they're there because we weren't.
"Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:
MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —
PRESIDENT OBAMA:That's not true.
MR. ROMNEY:Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?
PRESIDENT OBAMA:No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.
"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard
a. "This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.
He wrote in
Politico Magazine that in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki,
“told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.
Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast
Obama rejected it......
....leaving the field free for ISIS.
Then, he totally miscalculated:
"MSNBC Military Analyst Gen. Barry McCaffrey argued that “the president’s notion they [ISIS] were the JV, that they’re contained, that the only option is 150,000 troops back in to Iraq is nonsense” and described his conduct in that day’s press conference as “disappointing, at best” on Monday’s “MSNBC Live.”
MSNBC Analyst McCaffrey: Obama Saying ISIS Was the JV and Contained Is 'Nonsense,' Conduct 'Disappointing' - Breitbart
So.....wadda ya' think: Obama's creation of ISIS.....was it action or inaction?